Towards a service-dominant platform for public value co-creation in a smart city: Evidence from two metropolitan cities in China

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 142, Issue , 2019, Pages 168-182

  Yu, Jiang ^a,b   Wen, Yating ^a,b   Jin, Jing ^a,b   Zhang, Yue ^a,b  

^a Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Case study; Service dominant platform; Smart city services; Value co creation

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES;

EMERGING COUNTRIES; FORMATION AND EVOLUTIONS; METROPOLITAN CITIES; SERVICE DOMINANT PLATFORM; SERVICE INNOVATION; SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES; TECHNOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURES; VALUE CO CREATIONS;

SMART CITY;

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INNOVATION; METROPOLITAN AREA; PUBLIC SERVICE; SMART CITY;

CHINA; GUANGDONG; GUANGZHOU; SHANGHAI;

EID: 85057982939     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anttiroiko, A.V., Valkama, P., Bailey, S.J., Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services. AI & Soc. 29:3 (2014), 323–334.
2. Arakji, R., Lang, K., An Evolutionary Theory of Innovation and Strategic Platform Openness for Web 2.0 Businesses. 2010.
3. Auerbach, B.C.F., Silverstein, L.B., Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. 2003, New York University Press.
4. Barile, S., Polese, F., Linking the Viable System and Many-to-many Network Approaches to Service-dominant Logic and Service Science. 2, 2010, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 325–330.
5. Bech-Petersen, S., Bech-Petersen, S., Castelnovo, W., Miettinen, V., Miettinen, V., Stock, W.G., Open innovation in smart cities: civic participation and co-creation of public services. Asis&t Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives Through Information & Technology, vol. 53, 2016, American Society for Information Science, 6.
6. Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., Hess, T., How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors' perspective. J. Inf. Technol. 30 (2015), 209–228.
7. Chatterjee, S., Kar, A.K., Smart cities in developing economies: A literature review and policy insights. International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 2015, IEEE, 2335–2340.
8. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., et al. Understanding smart cities: an integrative framework. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2012, 2289–2297.
9. Cusumano, M., Technology strategy and management the evolution of platform thinking. Commun. ACM 53 (2010), 32–34.
10. Dan, W., Li, X., Li, Y.P., et al. China's “smart tourism destination” initiative: a taste of the service-dominant logic. J. Destination Market. Manag. 2:2 (2013), 59–61.
11. Davenport, T.H., The coming commoditization of processes. Harv. Bus. Rev., 83, 2005, 100.
12. Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E., Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50 (2007), 25–32.
13. Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., Opening Platforms: How, When and Why?. 2008, Social Science Electronic Publishing.
14. Ghazawneh, A., Henfridsson, O., Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model. Inf. Syst. J. 23 (2013), 173–192.
15. Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., Wicki, B., What passes as a rigorous case study?. Strateg. Manag. J. 29 (2008), 1465–1474.
16. Gummerus, J., Grönroos, C., The service revolution and its marketing implications: service logic vs service-dominant logic. Manag. Serv. Qual. 24 (2014), 206–229.
17. Hartmann, A., Roehrich, J., Frederiksen, L., Davies, A., Procuring complex performance: the transition process in public infrastructure. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 34 (2014), 174–194.
18. Henfridsson, O., Bygstad, B., The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure Evolution. 2013, Society for Information Management and the Management Information Systems Research Center.
19. Hilkert, D., Benlian, A., Hess, T., The Openness of Smartphone Software Platforms–A Framework and Preliminary Empirical Findings From the Developers' Perspective. 2011, Mc Graw Hill.
20. Janssen, M., Estevez, E., Lean government and platform-based governance—doing more with less. Gov. Inf. Q. 30 (2013), S1–S8.
21. Kanter, R.M., Litow, S.S., Informed and interconnected: A manifesto for smarter cities. Harvard Business School General Management Unit Working Paper, 09-141. Available from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=14, 2009, 20236.
22. Kosmin Langford, L., Platform leadership: how intel, microsoft, and cisco drive industry innovation [Book Review]. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev., 31, 2002 (138-).
23. Lanning, M., Michaels, E., A Business is a Value Delivery System. 1988.
24. Lee, J., Lee, H., Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Gov. Inf. Q. 31 (2014), S93–S105.
25. Lee, J., Baik, S., Lee, C.C., Building an integrated service management platform for ubiquitous cities. Computer 44 (2011), 56–63.
26. Lee, J.H., Phaal, R., Lee, S.H., An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80 (2013), 286–306.
27. Lee, J.H., Hancock, M.G., Hu, M.C., Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 89 (2014), 80–99.
28. Lee, R.P., Ozsomer, A., Zhou, K., Introduction to the special issue on “Innovation in and from Emerging Economies”. Ind. Mark. Manag. 50 (2015), 16–17.
29. Lusch, R.F., Understanding Resource Management. 1994.
30. Lusch, R.F., Nambisan, S., Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q. 39 (2015), 155–175.
31. Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L., O'Brien, M., Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. J. Retail. 83 (2007), 5–18.
32. Lyytinen, K., Rose, G.M., The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: the case of internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS Q. 27 (2003), 557–596.
33. Moore, Mark Harrison, Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. 1995, Harvard University Press.
34. Moore, A.C., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. By Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 3rd ed., 31, 2009, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, 267–268 2008. 379 pp. $96.95. ISBN 9781412906432 (hardback); $55.95. ISBN 9781412906449 (paperbac. Library & Information Science Research).
35. Nam, T., Pardo, T.A., Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV), 2011, ACM.
36. Ojo, A., Curry, E., Janowski, T., Designing next generation smart city initiatives - harnessing findings and lessons from a study of 10 smart city programs. 22nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2014), 2014, 1–14.
37. Paling, S., Miszkiewicz, M., Digital resources for dentistry database: A needs assessment[J]. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 42(1), 2010 NA-NA.
38. Roehrich, J., Lewis, M., Procuring Complex Performance: Implications for Exchange Governance Complexity. 34, 2014, Social Science Electronic Publishing, 221–241.
39. Sang, S.H.L., Han, J.H., Leem, Y.T., Tan, Y., Towards Ubiquitous City: Concept, Planning, and Experiences in the Republic of Korea. 23, 2008, 148–170.
40. Sheehan, J., Understanding service sector innovation. Commun. ACM 49 (2006), 42–47.
41. Siggelkow, N., Evolution toward fit. Adm. Sci. Q. 47 (2002), 125–159.
42. Spohrer, J., Anderson, L.C., Pass, N.J., Ager, T., Gruhl, D., Service science. J. Grid Comput. 6 (2008), 313–324.
43. Staykova, K.S., Damsgaard, J., The race to dominate the mobile payments platform: entry and expansion strategies. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 14 (2015), 319–330.
44. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Venkatraman, N., Special issue: information technology and organizational governance: the IT governance cube. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 30 (2013), 7–12.
45. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A., Research commentary—platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21 (2017), 675–687.
46. Vargo, S.L., Market systems, stakeholders and value propositions. Eur. J. Mark. 45 (2011), 217–222.
47. Vargo, S.L., Akaka, M.A., Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: clarifications. Serv. Sci. 1 (2009), 32–41.
48. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68 (2004), 1–17.
49. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36:1 (2008), 1–10.
50. Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M.A., On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 26 (2008), 145–152.
51. Vu, K., Hartley, K., Promoting smart cities in developing countries: policy insights from Vietnam. Telecommun. Policy, 2017.
52. West, J., How open is open enough?: melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy 32 (2003), 1259–1285.
53. West, J., O'Mahony, S., The role of participation architecture in growing sponsored open source communities. Ind. Innov. 15 (2008), 145–168.
54. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Applied Social Research Methods). 2011, Sage.
55. Yovanof, G.S., Hazapis, G.N., An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 49 (2009), 445–463.