State of the art, state of the science?

Research Synthesis Methods

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 615-618

  Booth, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIBRARY; LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCIENCE; STANDARD; STANDARDS;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LIBRARIES, MEDICAL; MEDLINE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SCIENCE;

EID: 85057960801     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17592887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1324     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Booth A. How consistent is MEDLINE indexing?—a few reservations. Health Info Libr J. 1990;7(1):22-26.
2. Booth A. The place of CINAHL within the British context. Health Info Libr J. 1991;8(4):220-223.
3. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994;309(6964):1286-1291.
4. Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? Systematic Reviews. 2013;2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-78
5. Pritchard SJ, Weightman AL. Towards a Cochrane information retrieval methods group: a progress report. Health Info Libr J. 2003;20(s1):69-71.
6. Booth A. Research or evaluation? Does it matter? Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(3):255-258.
7. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:510-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1279.
8. Sutton A, Galvan De La Cruz MC, Leaviss J, Booth A. Searching for trial protocols: a comparison of methods. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:551-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1281.
9. Rogers M, Bethel A, Abbott R. Locating qualitative studies in dementia on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO: a comparison of search strategies. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:579-586. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1280.
10. Isojarvi J, Wood H, Lefebvre C, Glanville J. Challenges of identifying unpublished data from clinical trials: getting the best out of clinical trials registers and other novel sources. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:561-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1294.
11. Spry C, Mierzwinski-Urban M. The impact of the peer review of literature search strategies in support of rapid review reports. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:521-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1330
12. Marshall IJ, Noel-Storr A, Kuiper J, Thomas J, Wallace BC. Machine learning for identifying randomized controlled trials: an evaluation and practitioner's guide. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:602-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1287.
13. Anderson P, Shannon C, Bickett S, et al. Systematic reviews and tech mining, a methodological comparison. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:540-550. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1318
14. Wood H, O'Connor A, Sargeant J, Glanville J. Information retrieval for systematic reviews in food and feed topics: a narrative review. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:527-539. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1289.
15. Booth A. How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(4):431-435.
16. Ogilvie D, Hamilton V, Egan M, Petticrew M. Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(9):804-808.
17. Langlois A, Nie J-Y, Thomas J, Hong QN, Pluye, P. Discriminating between empirical studies and nonempirical works using automated text classification. Res Syn Meth. 2018;9:587-601. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1317
18. Booth A. Evidence based perspectives on information access and retrieval. In: Booth A, Brice A, eds. Evidence Based Practice for Information Professionals: A Handbook. London: Facet Publishing; 2004:231-246.
19. Halladay CW, Trikalinos TA, Schmid IT, Schmid CH, Dahabreh IJ. Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(9):1076-1084.
20. Foster MJ, Jewell ST, editors. Assembling the pieces of a systematic review: a guide for librarians. Rowman & Littlefield; 2017.