Waste characterization and classification: Sample collection design

Hazardous and Radioactive Waste Treatment Technologies Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 2.1-3-2.1-34

  Maney, John P ^a  

^a Environmental Measurements Assessment   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057924516     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. ASTM, 1995. ASTM D5792, Practice for the Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Man-agement Activities: Development of Data Quality Objectives. American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, Conshohocken, PA 19428.
2. ASTM, 1996a. ASTM D6044, Standard Guide for Representative Sampling for Management of Wastes and Contaminated Media.
3. ASTM, 1996b. ASTM D 5956, Standard Guide for Sampling Strategies for Heterogeneous Wastes. ASTM, 1996c. ASTM D 6051, Standard Guide for Composite Sampling and Field Subsampling forEnvironmental Waste Management Activities.
4. ASTM, 1997. ASTM D 6250, Standard Practice for Derivation of Decision Point and Confidence Limit for Statistical Testing of the Mean Concentration in Waste Management Decisions.
5. ASTM, 1998a. ASTM D 6311, Standard Guide for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management Activities: Selection and Optimization of Sampling Design.
6. ASTM, 1998b. ASTM D 6232, Standard Guide Selection of Sampling Equipment for Waste and Contam-inated Media Data Collection Activities.
7. ASTM, 1998c. ASTM D 6323, Standard Guide for Laboratory Subsampling of Media Related to Waste Management Activities.
8. Gilbert, R.O., 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
9. Gilbert, R.O., 1997. In situ measurements, Part 2, Environmental Testing and Analysis, July/August, 14.
10. Gy, P., 1992. Sampling of Heterogeneous and Dynamic Materials Systems, Elsevier, New York.
11. Maney, J.P., 1993. Characterizing Heterogeneous Materials, Environmental Monitoring Issues, EPA/600/R-93/033, March, C-16 to C-47.
12. Myers, J.C., 1997. Geostatistical Error Management, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
13. NUREG, 1997. Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
14. Pitard, F., 1993. Pierre Gy’s Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
15. Taylor, J.K. 1987. Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
16. U.S. ACE, 1995. Technical Project Planning Guidance for HTRW Data Quality Design. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. EM 200-1-2, July 31.
17. U.S. DOE, 1993. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Process, Elements, and Techniques Guidance, Module 7 Streamlined Approach for Environmental Restoration. Office of Environmen-tal Guidance, RCRA/CERCLA Division, December.
18. USEPA, 1992. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes – SW-846.
19. USEPA, 1995. Guidance for the Preparation of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Quality-Related Documents, EPA QA/G-6, EPA/600/R-96/027.
20. USEPA, 1996. EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans — External Working Draft.
21. USEPA, 1997. The EPA Quality System, EPA QA/G-0, Final, Office of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, August.
22. USEPA, 1998. EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans, EPA QA/G-5, EPA/600/R-98/018. USEPA, 2000. Data Quality Objective Process for Hazardous Waste Site Investigations, EPA QA/G-4HW, EPA/600/R-00/007.