Communications and coordination training with speech-interactive synthetic teammates: A design and evaluation case study

Human Factors in Simulation and Training

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 387-416

  Bell, Benjamin ^a   Ryder, Joan M ^a   Pratt, Stacie N ^b  

^a CHI SYSTEMS INC   (United States)

^b Laughlin Air Force Base   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85057165666     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. AETC, 2002. T-6 Aircrew Training (AFI 11-2T-6, v1). Air Education and Training Command, 1 May 2002.
2. AETC, 2004. T-6 Primary Flying (AFMAN 11-248). Air Education and Training Command, 31 Aug 2004.
3. AETC, 2006a. Runway Supervisory Unit (RSU) Operations (AFI 11-204). Air Education and Training Command, 23 Jan 2006.
4. AETC, 2006b. T-6 Operations Procedures (AFI 11-2T-6, v3). Air Education and Training Command, 19 April 2006.
5. AFRL, 2002. Advanced Training Technology Needs for AETC Flying Training (Final Report, ETTAP Project 02-19). Mesa, AZ: Air Force Research Laboratory.
6. Baker, D., Prince, C., Shrestha, L., Oser, R., & and Salas, E., 1993. Aviation computer games for crew resource management training. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(2), 143-156.
7. Beringer, D. B., 1994. Issues in using off-the-shelf PC-based flight simulation for research and training:Historical perspective, current solutions, and emerging technologies. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 90-94.
8. Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. (Eds.), 1997. Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E., 1997. Teamwork competencies: The intersection of team member knowledge, skills, and attitudes. In O’Neil, H. F. (Ed.), Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment. (pp. 151-174). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
10. Chatham, R. E., & Braddock, J., 2001. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Training Superiority and Training Surprise. Washington D.C.: Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, p. 5.
11. Fowlkes, J., & Burke, C. S., 2005. Event-based approach to training (EBAT). In Stanton, N., Hedge, A., Brookhuis, K., Salas, E., & Hendrick, H. (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods,. (pp. 47-1-47-5). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
12. Fowlkes, J. E., Dwyer, D., Oser, R. L., & Salas, E., 1998. Event-based approach to training (EBAT). The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(3), 209-221.
13. Hays, R. T., & Singer, M. J., 1989. Simulation fidelity in training system design: Bridging the gap between reality and training. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Isdale, J., Fencott, C., Heim, M., & Daly, L., (2002). Content design for virtual environments. In Stanney,. K. M. (Ed.), The virtual environment handbook. (pp. 519-532). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Jentsch, F., & Bowers, C. A., 1998. Evidence for the validity of PC-based simulations in studying aircrew coordination. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(3), 243-260.
16. Johnston, J. H., Smith-Jentsch, K. A., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A., 1997. Performance measurement tools for enhancing team decision-making. In Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Means, B., Salas, E., Crandall, B., & Jacobs, T. O., 1993. Training decision makers for the real world. In Klein, G., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods. (pp. 306-326). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. National Research Council, Committee on Modeling and Simulation. 1997. Modeling and Simulation: Linking Entertainment and Defense. NRC Computer Science and Telecommunications Board.
19. NAVAIR Orlando Training Systems Division. 2002. Training System Functional Description for F/A-18 C/E/F Hornet, Appendix E-Fidelity Analysis (TSFD Number: 497-FY02-012). NAVAIR ORL TSD:Orlando, FL.
20. Rogers, B. K. 1991. Microcomputer-Based Instrument Flight Simulation: Undergraduate Pilot Training Student Attitude Assessment. (Technical Report No. AL-TR-1991-0039). Chandler, AZ: Williams Air Force Base.
21. Salas, E., Bowers, C. A., & Rhodenizer, L., 1998. It is not how much you have but how you use it: Toward a rational use of simulation to support aviation training. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8(3), 197-208.
22. Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B. L., & Jona, M. K., 1994. The Design of Goal Based Scenarios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4), 305-345, 1994.
23. Swezey, R. W., & Salas. E. (Eds.)., 1992. Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. Zachary, W., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bilazarian, P., Krecker, D., Lardieri, P., & Burns, J., 1999. An intelligent embedded tutoring system for tactical team training: the Advanced Embedded Training System (AETS), International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 257-277.
25. Zachary, W., LeMentec, J. C., & Ryder, J. 1996. Interface agents in complex systems. In Ntuen, C., & Park, E. (Eds.), Human interaction with complex systems: Conceptual principles and design practice. (pp. 35-52). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
26. Zachary, W., Santarelli, T., Lyons, D., Bergondy, M., & Johnston, J. 2001. Using a community of intelligent synthetic entities to support operational team training. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, 215-224. Orlando: Institute for Simulation and Training.