Creating On-line Individual Education Plans: Preservice Teachers Learn to Make Data-based Decisions

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 23-34

  Meyers, Barbara ^a   Collier, Sunya ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056838046     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2003.10463302     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Atkins, S. L., 1998. Windows of Opportunity: Preservice teachers' perceptions of technology-based alternatives to field experiences. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17: 95–105.
2. Collier, S., and Meyers, B., 2003. “ Developing preservice teacher researchers to meet the needs of individual children ”. In Teacher education yearbook XI: Research on preparing teachers who can meet the needs of all children, Edited by: Rainer, J., and Guyton, E. M., Reston, VA: Kendall/Hunt.
3. Coughlin, E. C., and Lemke, C., 1999. “ Professional Competency Continuum: Dimension 3 ”. In Technology in American Schools: Seven Dimensions for Gauging Progress, Edited by: O'Riordan, K., Milken Family Foundation.
4. Doherty, K. M., and Orlofsky, G. F., 2001. Student survey says: Schools are probably not using educational technology as wisely or effectively as they could. Education Week, 20 (35): 45–48.
5. Gelzheiser, L. M., and Meyers, J., 1996. Classroom teachers' views of pull-in programs. Exceptionality, 6 (2): 81–98.
6. Gelzheiser, L. M., Meyers, J., and Pruzek, R. M., 1992. Effects of pull-in and pull- out approaches to reading instruction for special education and remedial reading students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,: 119–132. (1)
7. Higgins, E. L., and Raskind, M. H., 2000. Speaking to read: The effects of continuous vs. discrete speech recognition systems on the reading and spelling of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15 (1): 19–30.
8. Hoffman, L. M., 2002. Overview of public elementary and secondary schools and districts: School year 2000–2001, U.S. Department of Education. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002356.pdfNational Center for Educational Statistics. (On-line)
9. International Society of Technology Education. 2000. National educational technology standards for teachers, ISTE.
10. LePage, P., Lewis, A., and Casella, V., 1995. The effect of technology instruction on preservice teachers' confidence to teach special learners. Reading Improvement, 32 (3): 161–173.
11. Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. E., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Lipsky, D. K., 1994. National survey gives insight into inclusive movement. Inclusive Education Programs, 1 (3): 4–7.
13. Lytle, J. H., 2000. Teacher education at the millennium: A view from the cafeteria. Journal of Teacher Education, 51: 174–179.
14. Meyers, B., and Collier, S., 2000. The developmental cohort model: An innovative preservice teacher education program. Journal of Professional Studies, 8 (1): 60–66.
15. Meyers, J., Gelzheiser, L., Yelich, G., and Gallagher, M., 1990. Classroom, remedial, and resource teacher's views of pullout programs. The Elementary School Journal, 90 (5): 534–545.
16. Office of Technology Assessment. 1995. Teachers and technology: Making the connection, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. Pellegrino, J. W., and Altman, J. E., 1997. Information technology and teacher preparation: Some critical issues and illustrative solutions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72 (1): 89–121.
18. Schiller, E. P., Coutinho, M., and Kaufman, M. J., 1992. “ Establishing a unity between general and special education: A federal perspective ”. In The integration of students with special needs into regular classrooms: Policies and practices that work, Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
19. Semmel, M. I., Abernathy, T. V., Butera, G., and Lesar, S., 1991. Teacher perceptions of the regular education initiative. Exceptional Children, 58: 9–20.
20. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education. 1998. SITE position paper: Statement of basic principles and suggested actions (‘Ames White Paper’) (On-line) Available: http://www.aace.org/site/SITEstatement.htm
21. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (Original work published 1990)
22. Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C., eds. 2002. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavorial research, CA: Sage.
23. Valde, R., Bower, R., and Thomas, R. A., 1996. Developing preservice teacher's computer competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4 (2): 83–90.
24. Weinburgh, M., Smith, L., and Smith, K., 1997. Preparing preservice teachers to use technology in teaching math and science. Tech Trends, 42 (5): 43–45.
25. Wiesenmayer, R. L., and Koul, R., 1999. Level of Internet use among science teachers involved in a professional development project. Journal of Science and Education and Technology, 8 (2): 123–135.
26. Willis, J. W., and Mehlinger, H. D., 1996. “ Information technology and teacher education ”. In Handbook of Research in Teacher Education, 2nd Edition, Edited by: Sikula, John, Buttery, Thomas, and Guyton, Edith. 978–1029. McMillan, N.Y.: Association of Teacher Educators.