Introduction: Morphology, shape, and phylogenetics

Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-7

  MacLeod, Norman ^a   Forey, Peter L ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056431333     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203165171     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Almeida, M. T. and Bisby, F. A. (1984) ‘A simple method for establishing taxonomic characters from measurement data’, Taxon, 33, 405-409.
2. Archie, J. W. (1985) ‘Methods for coding variable morphological features for numeric taxonomic analysis’, Systematic Zoology, 34, 326-345.
3. Bock, W. J. (1973) ‘Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary taxonomy’, Systematic Zoology, 22, 375-392.
4. Bookstein, F. L. (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bookstein, F. L. (1993) ‘A brief history of the morphometric synthesis’, in Marcus, L. F., Bello, E. and García-Valdecasas, A. (eds) Contributions to morphometrics, Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8, pp. 18-40.
6. Chapill, J. A. (1989) ‘Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis’, Cladistics, 5, 217-234.
7. Colless, D. H. (1980) ‘Congruence between morphological and allozyme data for Menidia: a reappraisal’, Systematic Zoology, 29, 288-299.
8. Felsenstein, J. (1988) ‘Phylogenies and quantitative characters’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 445-471.
9. Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Hawkins, J. A. (2000) ‘A survey of primary homology assessment: different botanists perceive and define characters in different ways’, in Scotland, R. and Pennigton, R. T. (eds) Homology and systematics, London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 22-53.
11. Marcus, L. F., Bello, E. and García-Valdecasas, A. (1993) Contributions to morphometrics, Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8.
12. MacLeod, N. (2001) ‘The role of phylogeny in quantitative paleobiological analysis’, Paleobiology, 27, 226-241.
13. Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P. and Slice, D. E. (eds) (1996) Advances in morphometrics, NATO ASI Series, New York: Plenum Press.
14. Michevich, M. F. and Johnson, M. F. (1976) ‘Congruence between morphological and allozyme data’, Systematic Zoology, 25, 260-270.
15. Naylor, G. J. P. (1996) ‘Can partial warps be used as cladistic characters?', in Marcus, L. F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G. J. P. and Slice, D. E. (eds) Advances in Morphometrics, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 519-530.
16. Patterson, C. (1982) ‘Morphological characters and homology’, in Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E. (eds) Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction, Systematics Association Special Volume, No. 21, London: Academic Press, pp. 21-74.
17. Pimentel, R. A. and Riggins, R. (1987) ‘The nature of cladistic data’, Cladistics, 3, 201-209.
18. de Pinna, M. C. C. (1991) ‘Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm’, Cladistics, 7, 367-394.
19. Rae, T. C. (1998) ‘The logical basis for the use of continuous characters in phylogenetic systematics’, Cladistics, 14, 221-228.
20. Reyment, R. A. (1991) Multidimensional paleobiology, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
21. Rohlf, F. J. and Bookstein, F. L. (1990) Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Special Publication 2.
22. Swiderski, D. L., Zelditch, M. L. and Fink, W. L. (1998) ‘Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis’, Systematic Biology, 47, 508-519.
23. Thiele, K. (1993) ‘The holy grail of the perfect character: the cladistic treatment of morphometric data’, Cladistics, 9, 275-304.
24. Thompson, D. W. (1917) On growth and form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Thorpe, R. S. (1984) ‘Coding morphometric characters for constructing distance Wagner networks’, Evolution, 38, 244-355.
26. Zelditch, M. L., Fink, W. L. and Swiderski, D. L. (1995) ‘Morphometrics, homology, and phylogenetics: quantified characters as synapomorphies’, Systematic Biology, 44, 179-189.
27. Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L. and Fink, W. L. (2000) ‘Discovery of phylogenetic characters in morphometric data’, in Wiens, J. J. (ed.) Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data, Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 37-83.