Organic writing assessment: Dynamic criteria mapping in action

Organic Writing Assessment: Dynamic Criteria Mapping in Action

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-167

  Broad, Bob ^a   Adler Kassner, Linda ^b   Alford, Barry ^c   Detweiler, Jane ^d   Estrem, Heidi ^e   Harrington, Susanmarie ^f,g   McBride, Maureen ^d   Stalions, Eric ^h   Weeden, Scott ^g  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Mid Michigan Community College   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^e BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^g PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h USA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056272157     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (87)

1. Adler-Kassner, Linda. 2008. The activist WPA: Changing stories about writing and writers. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press
2. Adler-Kassner, Linda, and Heidi Estrem. 2003. Rethinking researched writing: Public literacy in the composition classroom. WPA Journal 26 (3): 119-131
3. Adler-Kassner, Linda, and Heidi Estrem. 2004-2006. First year writing program assessment. Eastern Michigan University. http:// www.emich.edu/english/fycomp/FYWPassessment/EMUFYWPassessmentsummary.html
4. Adler-Kassner, Linda, Chris Anson, and Rebecca Moore Howard. 2008. Framing plagiarism. In Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: A cross-disciplinary collection, edited by Carolyn Eisner and Martha Vicinus, 231-246. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
5. Bakhtin, MM. 2002. The dialogic imagination. trans Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. University of Texas Press
6. Barton, David and Mary Hamilton. 1998. Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge Press
7. Bawarshi, Anis. 2003. Genre and the invention of the writer. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press
8. Bawarshi, Anis. 2006. Sites of Invention: Genre and the enactment of first-year writing. In Relations, locations, positions: Composition theory for writing teachers, edited by Peter Vandenberg, Sue Hum, and Jennifer Clary-Lemon, 29-40. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
9. Beason, Larry. 2005. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. WPA Journal 29 (1/2): 115-118
10. Belanoff, Pat, and Heather Denny. 2006. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. Journal of Teaching Writing 22 (2): 127-138
11. Bizzell, Patricia, and Bruce Herzberg, eds. 2001. Glossary. The rhetorical tradition. New York: Bedford/St. Martin's
12. Boardman, Kathy, and Core Writing Program Assessment Committee. 2000. Core Writing Program Assessment Project. University of Nevada-Reno. Unpublished
13. Bray, Robert. 2000. Spin works! San Francisco: The Strategic Press Information Network Project
14. Broad, Bob. 1997. Reciprocal authorities in communal writing assessment: Constructing textual value within a 'New politics of inquiry.' Assessing Writing 4 (2): 133-167
15. Broad, Bob. 2000. Pulling your hair out: Crises of standardization in communal writing assessment. Research in the Teaching of English 35:213-60
16. Broad, Bob. 2003. What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press
17. Broad, Bob. 2004. Making our assessments of writing more authentic, educative, rhetorical, McGraw-Hill teaching composition. McGraw-Hill. http://www.mhhe.com/socscience/ english/tc/broad/BroadModule.htm
18. Broad, Bob. 2007. Dynamic criteria mapping in action: Growing evaluative community locally and organically. Half-day workshop at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New York, NY, March 22-25
19. Broad, Bob. 2008. Methods for mapping the values of contemporary poetry. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New Orleans, LA, April 2-5
20. Broad, Bob, and Michael Boyd. 2005. Rhetorical writing assessment: The practice and theory of complementarity. Journal of Writing Assessment 2 (1): 7-20
21. Brockman, Henry. 2001. Organic matters. Congerville, IL: Terra Books
22. Brown, John Seely, Stephen Denning, Katrina Groh, and Lawrence Prusack, eds. 2005. Storytelling in organizations: Why storytelling is transforming 21st century organizations and management. Oxford: Elesevier Butterworth-Heinemann
23. Charmaz, Kathy. 2000. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Handbook of qualitative research 2nd ed, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 509-36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
24. Condon, William, and Diane Kelly-Riley. 2004. Assessing and teaching what we value: The relationship between college-level writing and critical thinking. Assessing Writing 9:56-75
25. deCerteau, Michel. 1984. The practice of everyday life. Trans. Steven Rendell. Berkeley: University of California Press
26. deJoy, Nancy, ed. 2004. Process this: Undergraduate writing in composition studies. Logan UT: Utah State University Press
27. Devitt, Amy. 2004. Writing Genres. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press
28. Diederich, Paul B., John W. French, and Sydell T. Carlton. 1961. Factors in judgments of writing ability (ETS Research Bulletin 61-15). Princeton: Educational Testing Service
29. Durst, Russel K. 2006. Writing at the postsecondary level. In Research on composition: Multiple perspectives on two decades of change, edited by Peter Smagorinsky, 78-107. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University
30. Elbow, Peter. 2005. A friendly challenge to push the outcomes statement further. In The outcomes book: Debate and consensus after the WPA outcomes statement, edited by Susanmarie Harrington, Keith Rhodes, Ruth Fischer, and Rita Malenczyk, 177-90. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press
31. Eliason, John. 2004. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. Composition Studies. http://www.compositionstudies.tcu.edu/ bookreviews/online/32-2/eliason.html
32. Ericsson, Patricia F., and Richard H. Haswell, eds. 2006. Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press
33. Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change Cambridge; Polity
34. Gee, James. 1996. Social linguistics and literacies. 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis. General Studies Writing Program. 2006-07. Instructors' handbook. Bowling Green, OH
35. Gee, James. 2006-07. Placement evaluators' handbook. Bowling Green, OH
36. Gee, James. 2007. General studies writing program rubric. Bowling Green, OH
37. Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company
38. Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications
39. Hall, Stuart. 1984. The narrative construction of reality. Southern Review 17:1-17
40. Harrington, Susanmarie. 2005. Learning to ride the waves: Making decisions. Writing Program Administration 28 (3): 9-39
41. Harrington, Susanmarie. 2008. What maps mean for assessment and planning. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New Orleans, LA, April 2-5
42. Haswell, Richard H. 1998. Rubrics, prototypes, and exemplars: Categorization theory and systems of writing placement. Assessing Writing 5 (2): 231-268
43. Haswell, Richard H. 2001. Beyond outcomes: Assessment and instruction within a university writing program. Vol. 5 Perspectives on writing: Theory, research, practice. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing
44. Helmers, Marguerite. 1994. Writing students: Composition testimonials and representations of students. Albany, NY: SUNY Press
45. Huot, Brian. 1993. The influence of holistic scoring procedures on reading and rating student essays. In Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment: Theoretical and empirical foundations, edited by Michael Williamson and Brian Huot, 206-236. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
46. Huot, Brian. 2002. (Re) articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press
47. Huot, Brian. 2008. From writing assessment theory and practice to regulation. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, New Orleans, LA, April 2-5
48. Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press
49. Johnson, Lisa. 2004. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. Assessing Writing 9:181-85
50. Kalikoff, Beth. 2004. Mind the gap: stepping out with caution in assessment and student public writing. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. College English 66 (5): 545-553
51. Lakoff, George. 2004. Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green
52. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Time and the other. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press
53. Lynne, Patricia. 2004. Coming to terms: A theory of writing assessment. Logan: Utah State University Press
54. Miller, Richard. 1999. As if learning mattered. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
55. Moss, Pamela A. 1996. Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voices from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher 25 (1): 20-28, 43
56. Moss, Pamela A. 1998. Recovering a dialectal view of rationality. Social Indicators Researcher 45:55-67
57. Myers, Miles. 2003. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. The National Council of Teachers of English. http://www.ncte.org/pubs/ books/selects/college/120926.htm
58. Nelson-Beene, Donna. 2006. Independently healthy, wealthy, and wise: Evolution within a free standing writing program. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Chicago, IL, March 22-25
59. Nuhfer, Ed. 2006. A fractal thinker looks at measuring change: part 1: Pre-post course tests and multiple working hypothesis-educating in fractal patterns. National Teaching and Learning Forum 15 (4): 15. http://www.ntlf.com/FTPSite/issues/v15n4/diary.htm
60. Nunberg, Geoffrey. 2006. Talking right: How conservatives turned liberalism into a tax-raising, lattedrinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, body piercing, Hollywood-loving, left-wing freak show. New York: Public Affairs
61. O'Neill, Peggy. 2003. Moving beyond holistic scoring through validity inquiry. Journal of Writing Assessment 1 (1): 47-65
62. Palmer, Parker J. 1998. The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
63. Plato. 2001. Phaedrus. In The rhetorical tradition, 2nd ed, edited by Patricia Bizzell and Bruce Herzberg, 80-168. New York: Bedford/St. Martin's
64. Pollan, Michael. 2006. The ominvore's dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: Penguin
65. Pope, Rob. 1995. Textual intervention: Critical and creative strategies for literary studies. New York: Routledge
66. Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. 2005. The Allyn and Bacon guide to writing: concise edition. 4th ed. New York: Longman
67. Ray, Ruth. 1993. The practice of theory: Teacher research in composition. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
68. Reynolds, Nedra. 1998. Composition's imagined geographies: The politics of space in the frontier, city, and cyberspace. College Composition and Communication 50 (1): 12-35
69. Russell, David. 1997. Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication 14 (4): 504-554
70. Selfe, Cynthia and Gail Hawisher. 2004. Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy in the United States. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: LEA
71. Shepard, Lorrie A. 2000. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 29 (7): 4-14
72. Smith, Barbara. 1988. Contingencies of value: Alternative perspectives for critical theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
73. Smith, William L. 1993. Assessing the reliability and adequacy of using holistic scoring of essays as a college composition technique. In Validating holistic scoring for writing assessment: Theoretical and empirical foundations, edited by Michael Williamson and Brian Huot, 142-205. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
74. Stalions, Eric W. 2007. Dynamic criteria mapping: A study of the rhetorical values of placement evaluators. PhD diss., Bowling Green State University
75. Strauss, Anselm. 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York:Cambridge University Press
76. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In Handbook of qualitative research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 273-85. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
77. Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
78. Strauch, John. 2004. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 32 (2): 200-202
79. Syverson, Margaret A. 1999. The wealth of reality: An ecology of composition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press
80. Volosinov, VN. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language, trans Ladislav Matejka and I.R. Titunik. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
81. Washington State University Critical Thinking Project. 2002. WSU Writing Program. Washington State University. http://wsuctproject.wsu.edu
82. White, Edward M. 1989. Developing successful college writing programs. San Francisco: Jossey Bass
83. White, Edward M. 1994. Teaching and assessing writing, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
84. White, Edward M. 1995. An apologia for the timed impromptu essay test. College Composition and Communication 46 (1): 30-45
85. White, Edward M. 2001. Revisiting the importance of placement and basic studies: Evidence of success. In Mainstreaming basic writers: Politics and pedagogies of access, edited by Gerri McNenney and Sallyanne. H. Fitzgerald, 19-28. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Publishers
86. White, Edward M. 2004. Review of What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing, by Bob Broad. Composition Studies 32 (1): 110-116
87. White, Edward M. 2005. The Misuse of writing assessment for political purposes. Journal of Writing Assessment 2 (1): 21-35