-
1
-
-
84919639124
-
-
Accessed 28 Nov 2017
-
Research Ethics Service. The Health Research Authority https://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-us/committees-and-services/res-and-recs/. Accessed 28 Nov 2017.
-
The Health Research Authority
-
-
-
2
-
-
84925934320
-
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review
-
Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014;17(5):637–50.
-
(2014)
Health Expect
, vol.17
, Issue.5
, pp. 637-650
-
-
Brett, J.1
Staniszewska, S.2
Mockford, C.3
Herron-Marx, S.4
Hughes, J.5
Tysall, C.6
-
4
-
-
84890202190
-
Lay REC members: Patient or public?
-
Staley K. Lay REC members: patient or public? J Med Ethics. 2013;39:780–2.
-
(2013)
J Med Ethics
, vol.39
, pp. 780-782
-
-
Staley, K.1
-
5
-
-
84959931479
-
Making it clear and relevant: Patients and carers add value to studies through research document reviews
-
Staley K, Ashcroft J, Doughty L, Szmukler G. Making it clear and relevant: patients and carers add value to studies through research document reviews. Ment Health Soc Incl. 2016;20(1):36–43.
-
(2016)
Ment Health Soc Incl
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 36-43
-
-
Staley, K.1
Ashcroft, J.2
Doughty, L.3
Szmukler, G.4
-
6
-
-
84979687295
-
-
Health Services and Delivery Research: Southampton
-
Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, McNeilly E, Goodman C, Howe A, et al. ReseArch with patient and public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study. Health Services and Delivery Research: Southampton; 2015.
-
(2015)
Research with Patient and Public Involvement: A Realist Evaluation – the RAPPORT Study
-
-
Wilson, P.1
Mathie, E.2
Keenan, J.3
McNeilly, E.4
Goodman, C.5
Howe, A.6
-
7
-
-
58149121176
-
An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: The science/ethics quality boundary examined
-
Angell E, Bryman A, Ashcroft R, Dixon-Woods M. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the science/ethics quality boundary examined. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:131–6.
-
(2008)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.17
, pp. 131-136
-
-
Angell, E.1
Bryman, A.2
Ashcroft, R.3
Dixon-Woods, M.4
-
8
-
-
84858864312
-
Public involvement in research applications to the National Research Ethics Service
-
Tarpey M. Public involvement in research applications to the National Research Ethics Service. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2011.
-
(2011)
Eastleigh: INVOLVE
-
-
Tarpey, M.1
-
10
-
-
85067261774
-
-
London: HRA; Southampton: INVOLVE
-
Elliott J, Horwood A, Hunn A, Staley K, Tarpey M. Public involvement in applications to the Health Research Authority Research Ethics Service: Comparative analysis of 2010, 2012 and 2014 data. London: HRA; Southampton: INVOLVE; 2017.
-
(2017)
Public Involvement in Applications to the Health Research Authority Research Ethics Service: Comparative Analysis of 2010, 2012 and 2014 Data
-
-
Elliott, J.1
Horwood, A.2
Hunn, A.3
Staley, K.4
Tarpey, M.5
-
11
-
-
84867276477
-
Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic
-
McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica. 2012;22(3):276–82.
-
(2012)
Biochemia Medica
, vol.22
, Issue.3
, pp. 276-282
-
-
McHugh, M.L.1
-
14
-
-
85067242602
-
Patients’, clinicians and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: There is an important mismatch
-
Crowe S, Fenton M, Hall M, Cowan K, Chalmers I. Patients’, clinicians and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch. Res Involvement Engagement. 2015;1:2.
-
(2015)
Res Involvement Engagement
, vol.1
, pp. 2
-
-
Crowe, S.1
Fenton, M.2
Hall, M.3
Cowan, K.4
Chalmers, I.5
-
16
-
-
85042883066
-
A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: Time to develop ethically conscious standards
-
Pandya-Wood R, Barron DS, Elliott J. A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards. Res Involvement Engagement. 2017;3:6.
-
(2017)
Res Involvement Engagement
, vol.3
, pp. 6
-
-
Pandya-Wood, R.1
Barron, D.S.2
Elliott, J.3
-
19
-
-
84919663548
-
Co-research with older people: Perspectives on impact
-
Littlechild R, Tanner D, Hall K. Co-research with older people: perspectives on impact. Qual Soc Work. 2015;14(1): 18–35.
-
(2015)
Qual Soc Work
, vol.14
, Issue.1
, pp. 18-35
-
-
Littlechild, R.1
Tanner, D.2
Hall, K.3
-
20
-
-
84907510280
-
An innovative toolkit: Increasing the role and value of patient and public involvement in the dissemination of research findings
-
McNichol E, Grimshaw P. An innovative toolkit: increasing the role and value of patient and public involvement in the dissemination of research findings. Int Prac Dev J. 2014;4(1):Article 8.
-
(2014)
Int Prac Dev J
, vol.4
, Issue.1
-
-
McNichol, E.1
Grimshaw, P.2
|