Εnhancing social networking in smart cities: Privacy and security borderlines

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 142, Issue , 2019, Pages 285-300

  Moustaka, Vaia ^a   Theodosiou, Zenonas ^b   Vakali, Athena ^a   Kounoudes, Anastasis ^b   Anthopoulos, Leonidas G ^c  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

^b SIGNALGENERIX LTD   (Cyprus)

^c TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LARISSA   (Greece)

Author keywords

Behavioral patterns; Engagement; Information security; Online social networks; Privacy; Smart living; Smart people

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; OPEN DATA; SECURITY OF DATA; SMART CITY; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS; ENGAGEMENT; ON-LINE SOCIAL NETWORKS; SMART LIVINGS; SMART PEOPLE;

NETWORK SECURITY;

AGE STRUCTURE; BORDER REGION; ETHNICITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SECURITY THREAT; SMART CITY; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS;

EID: 85056004059     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.026     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Acquisti, A., The economics of personal data and the economics privacy, OECD working articles WPISP and WPIE. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/8/51/46968784.pdf, 2010. (Accessed 20 March 2018)
2. Acquisti, A., Gross, R., Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing and privacy on the Facebook. Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET'06), 2006, 10.1007/11957454_3.
3. Ahmed, K.B., Bouhorma, M., Ahmed, M.-B., Age of big data and smart cities: privacy TradeOff. IJETT, 16(6), 2014 (Oct. 2014. Retrieved, Dec. 2017, from) https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1411/1411.0087.pdf.
4. Aiello, L.M., Schifanella, R., Quercia, D., Aletta, F., Chatty Maps: Constructing Sound Maps of Urban Areas From Social Media Data. 2016, The Royal Society Publishing, 10.1098/rsos.150690.
5. Albino, V., Berardi, U., Dangelico, R.M., Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 22:1 (2015), 3–21, 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092 (February 2015).
6. Aljohani, M., Nisbet, A., Blincoe, K., A survey of social media users privacy settings & information disclosure. Johnstone, M., (eds.) Proceedings of 14th Australian Information Security Management Conference, 2016, 10.4225/75/58a693deee893.
7. Amosun, P.A., Ige, O.A., Choo, K.K.R., Impact of a participatory cybercrime prevention programme on secondary school students' attainment in crime prevention concepts in civic education and social studies. Educ. Inf. Technol. 20:3 (2013), 505–518, 10.1007/s10639-013-9298-0.
8. Angulo, J., Ortlieb, M., “WTH..!?!” Experiences, reactions, and expectations related to online privacy panic situations. Proceedings of the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUP). Available at: https://www.usenix.org/conference/soups2015/proceedings/presentation/angulo, 2015. (Accessed 15 March 2018)
9. Anthopoulos, L.G., Understanding Smart Cities: A Tool for Smart Government or an Industrial Trick?. 2017, Springer International Publishing, 10.1007/978-3-319-57015-0.
10. Arachchilage, N.A.G., Love, S., Beznosov, K., Phishing threat avoidance behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 60:C (2016), 185–197, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.065 July 2016.
11. Baek, Y.M., Kim, E.M., Bae, Y., My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31 (2014), 48–56, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.010 (Feb. 2014).
12. Ball, A.L., Ramim, M.M., Levy, Y., Examining users' personal information sharing awareness, habits, and practices in social networking sites and e-learning systems. Online J. Appl. Knowl. Manag. 3:1 (2015), 108–207 Available at: http://www.iiakm.org/ojakm/articles/2015/volume3_1/OJAKM_Volume3_1pp180-207.pdf. (Accessed 20 March 2018)
13. Bartoli, A., Hernandez-Serrano, J., Sorian, M., Dohler, M., Kountouris, A., Barthel, D., Security and privacy in your smart city. Proceedings of Barcelona Smart Cities Congress. Available at: http://www.cttc.es/publication/security-and-privacy-in-your-smart-city/, 2011. (Accessed 28 December 2017)
14. Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., Portugali, Y., Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 214:1 (2012), 481–518, 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3 (November 2012).
15. BBC, Facebook scandal ‘hit 87 million users’. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-43649018, 2018. (Accessed 18 April 2018)
16. Bellman, S., Johnson, E.J., Kobrin, S.J., Lohse, G.L., International differences in information privacy concerns: a global survey of consumers. Inf. Soc. 20 (2004), 313–324.
17. Beltran, V., Skarmeta, A.F., Ruiz, P.M., An ARM-compliant architecture for user privacy in smart cities: SMARTIE—quality by design in the IoT. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., 2017, 10.1155/2017/3859836.
18. Bergström, A., Online privacy concerns: a broad approach to understanding the concerns of different groups for different uses. Comput. Hum. Behav. 53 (2015), 419–426, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.025 (Dec. 2015).
19. Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., Hansen, D., The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Gov. Inf. Q. 29:1 (2012), 30–40, 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004.
20. Bianchini, D., Avila, I., Smart cities and their smart decisions: ethical considerations. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 33:1 (2014), 33–40, 10.1109/MTS.2014.2301854.
21. Bird, K., Keeping people at the centre of smart city initiatives. Available at: https://www.iso.org/news/ref2247.html, 2017. (Accessed 30 March 2018)
22. Bright, J., Margetts, H., Hale, S., Yasseri, T., The Use of Social Media for Research and Analysis: A Feasibility Study. 2014 Available at: file:///C:/Users/User01/Desktop/use-of-social-media-for-research-and-analysis.pdf (Accessed 28 February 2018).
23. British Standards Institute (BSI), Mapping Smart City Standards: Based on a Data Flow Model. 2016 Available at: http://www.bsigroup.com/en–GB/smart–cities/smart–cities–standards–mapping–research–and–modelling/ (Accessed 30 August 2018).
24. Brown, I., Zukowski, T., Examining the influence of demographic factors on internet users' information privacy concerns. Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries, 2007, 197–204.
25. Cavazza, F., Social Media Landscape 2017. Available at: https://fredcavazza.net/2017/04/19/social-media-landscape-2017/, 2017. (Accessed 25 February 2018)
26. Cecere, G., Guel, F.L., Soulié, N., Perceived internet privacy concerns on social networks in Europe. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 96(2015), 2015, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.021 277–28.
27. Cobb, S., Data privacy and data protection: US law and legislation. Available at: https://www.welivesecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/US-data-privacy-legislation-white-paper.pdf, 2016. (Accessed 15 March 2018)
28. Consolvo, S., Smith, I.E., Matthews, T., LaMarca, A., Tabert, J., Powledge, P., Location disclosure to social relations: Why, when, & what people want to share. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘05), 2005, ACM, 81–90, 10.1145/1054972.1054985.
29. Conteh, N.Y., Schmick, P.J., Cybersecurity: risks, vulnerabilities and countermeasures to prevent social engineering attacks. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Res., 6(23), 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.19101/IJACR.2016.623006.
30. Dameri, R.P., Ricciardi, F., Using Social Networks in Smart City:organizational challenges, synergies, and benefits. Proceedings of the European Conference on Social Media (ECSM 2014), 2014.
31. Dong, C., Jin, H., Knijnenburg, B.P., Predicting privacy behavior on online social networks. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 2015 Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10554. (Accessed 15 March 2018)
32. Doran, D., Severin, K., Gokhale, S., Dagnino, A., Social Media Enabled Human Sensing for Smart Cities. 2014, AI Communications, 2014 Available at: http://knoesis.wright.edu/sites/default/files/aic14.pdf. (Accessed 28 December 2017)
33. EDPS (European Data Protection Supervisor), The history of the general data protection regulation. Available at https://edps.europa.eu/data-protection/data-protection/legislation/history-general-data-protection-regulation_en, 2018. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
34. Efstathiades, H., Antoniades, D., Pallis, G., Dikaiakos, M.-D., Identification of key locations based on online social network activity. Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 2015, 10.1145/2808797.2808877.
35. Elmaghraby, A.S., Losavio, M.M., Cyber security challenges in smart cities: safety, security and privacy. J. Adv. Res. 5 (2014), 491–497, 10.1016/j.jare.2014.02.006.
36. EU GDPR Portal, GDPR key changes. Available at https://www.eugdpr.org/the-regulation.html, 2018. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
37. Falher, G.L., Gionis, A., Mathioudakis, M., Where is the Soho of Rome?? Measures and algorithms for finding similar neighborhoods in cities. In Proceeding of the Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM15/paper/view/10514, 2015. (Accessed 25 February 2018)
38. Fire, M., Goldschmidt, R., Elovici, Y., Online social networks: threats and solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16:4 (2014), 2019–2036 Fourth Quarter.
39. Fogel, J., Nehmad, E., Internet social networking communities: risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25:1 (2009), 153–160, 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.006.
40. Furnell, S., End-user security culture a lesson that will never be learnt?. Comput. Fraud Secur. 2008:4 (2008), 6–9, 10.1016/S1361-3723(08)70064-2.
41. Gangadharbatla, H., Facebook me: collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration's attitudes toward social networking sites. J. Interact. Advert., 8(2), 2008, 10.1080/15252019.2008.10722138.
42. Giatsoglou, M., Chatzakou, D., Vakali, A., User communities evolution in microblogs: a public awareness barometer for real world events. World Wide Web, 18, 2015, 1269, 10.1007/s11280-014-0301-5.
43. Giffinger, R., Gudrun, H., Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of cities?. ACE 4:12 (2010), 7–25 (February 2010) http://hdl.handle.net/2099/8550.
44. Gkatziaki, V., Giatsoglou, M., Chatzakou, D., Vakali, A., DynamiCITY: revealing city dynamics from citizens social media broadcasts. Inf. Syst., 2017, 10.1016/j.is.2017.07.007.
45. Greenfield, A., Against the Smart City (The City is Here for You to Use). 2013, Do Projects, New York.
46. Gross, R., Acquisti, A., Information revelation and privacy in online social networks (The Facebook case). Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society (WPES'05), 2005, 10.1145/1102199.1102214.
47. Groth, A., Facebook's data scandal and Europe's new data privacy rule have massive implications for U.S. entrepreneurs. Available at: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/311273, 2018. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
48. Gundecha, P., Barbier, G., Liu, H., Exploiting vulnerability to secure user privacy on a social networking site. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2011, 511–519, 10.1145/2020408.2020489.
49. Hanna, R., Rohm, A., Crittenden, V.L., We're all connected: the power of the social media ecosystem. Bus. Horiz. 54:3 (2011), 265–273, 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007.
50. Hoadley, C.M., Xu, H., Lee, J.-J., Beth, R.M., Privacy as information access and illusory control: the case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9:2010 (2010), 50–60, 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.05.001.
51. Hugl, U., Reviewing person's value of privacy of online social networking. Internet Res. 21:4 (2011), 384–407, 10.1108/10662241111158290.
52. Hutchinson, A., Here's why Twitter is so important, to everyone. Available at: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/social-networks/heres-why-twitter-so-important-everyone, 2016. (Accessed 28 February 2018)
53. International Standards Organization (ISO), Smart Community Infrastructures – Principles and Requirements for Performance Metrics. 2015 Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:ts:37151:ed–1:v1:en (Accessed 25 August 2018).
54. ISO/IEC JTC1 Information Technology, Smart cities. Available at https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/developing_standards/docs/en/smart_cities_report-jtc1.pdf, 2015. (Accessed 30 March 2018)
55. ISO/TC 268, ISO/CD 37122: Sustainable Development in Communities -Indicators for Smart Cities. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/69050.html, 2017 (Accessed Sept. 2018).
56. ITU-T FG-SSC, Overview of key performance indicators in smart sustainable cities. Available at https://www.itu.int/en/itu-t/focusgroups/ssc/documents/approved_deliverables/tr-overview-ssc.docx, 2014. (Accessed 30 March 2018)
57. Jang-Jaccard, J., Nepal, S., A survey of emerging threats in cybersecurity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 80:5 (2014), 973–993 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2014.02.005.
58. Jensen, C., Potts, C., Jensen, C., Privacy practices of internet users: self-reports versus observed behaviour. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 63 (2005), 203–227.
59. Kantarci, B., Mouftah, H.T., Trustworthy sensing for public safety in cloud-centric internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J., 1(4), 2014, 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2337886 (Aug. 2014).
60. Kim, S.K., Park, M.J., Rho, J.J., Effect of the government's use of social media on the reliability of the government: focus on twitter. Public Manag Rev., 17(3), 2015, 10.1080/14719037.2013.822530.
61. Kirby, T., Controversy surrounds England's new NHS database. Lancet, 383, 2014, 9918 http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(14)60230-0/fulltext.
62. Kisekka, V., Bagchi-Sen, S., Raghav Rao, H., Extent of private information disclosure on online social networks: an exploration of Facebook mobile phone users. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29:2013 (2013), 2722–2729, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.023.
63. Kitchin, R., The real–time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79:1 (2014), 1–14, 10.1007/s10708–013–9516–8 (February 2014).
64. Kitchin, R., The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 374(2083), 2016, 10.1098/rsta.2016.0115.
65. Knijnenburg, B.P., Kobsa, A., Jin, H., Dimensionality of information disclosure behavior. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 71:12 (2013), 1144–1162, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.06.003.
66. Komninos, N., Intelligent Cities Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces. 1st Edition, 2013, Routledge, London https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135159306.
67. Kuczerawy, A., Coudert, F., Privacy settings in social networking sites: is it fair?. Fischer-Hübner, S., Duquenoy, P., Hansen, M., Leenes, R., Zhang, G., (eds.) Privacy and Identity Management for Life. Privacy and Identity 2010 IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 352, 2011, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
68. Kumar, K.E., Ahmed, H.Α., 2016. Estimation of traffic with accuracy through twitter stream analysis. Int. J. Innov. Technol. 04:08 (July 2016), 1317–1324.
69. Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., Dey, A.K., Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. CHI ‘03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘03), 2003, DOI, ACM, 724–725, 10.1145/765891.765952.
70. Lee, J., Lee, H., Developing and validating a citizen-centric typology for smart city services. Gov. Inf. Q. 31 (2014), s93–s105, 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.010.
71. Levy, Y., Ramim, M.M., Initial development of a learners' ratified acceptance of multibiometrics intentions model (RAMIM). Interdiscip. J E-Learning objects 5 (2009), 318–319 Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/gscis_facarticles/31. (Accessed 30 January 2018)
72. Li, Y., Li, Y., Yan, Q., Deng, R.H., Privacy leakage analysis in online social networks. Comput. Secur. 49 (2015), 239–254, 10.1016/j.cose.2014.10.012.
73. Luo, R., Brody, R., Seazzu, A., Burd, S., Social engineering: the neglected human factor for information security management. Inf. Resour. Manag. J. 24:3 (2011), 1–8, 10.4018/irmj.2011070101 (July 2011).
74. Luo, F., Cao, G., Mulligan, K., Li, X., Explore spatiotemporal and demographic characteristics of human mobility via Twitter: a case study of Chicago. Appl. Geogr. 70 (2016), 11–25, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.03.001 (May 2016).
75. Macenaite, M., Kosta, E., Consent for processing children's personal data in the EU: following in US footsteps?. Inf. Commun. Technol. Law 26:2 (2017), 146–197, 10.1080/13600834.2017.1321096.
76. Madejski, M., Johnson, M., Bellovin, S.M., The Failure of Online Social Network Privacy Settings. 2011, Columbia University Academic Commons, 10.7916/D8NG4ZJ1.
77. Marinaro, L., Building smart cities starts with smart people. Available at: https://readwrite.com/2016/07/05/building-smart-cities-starts-with-smart-people/, 2016. (Accessed 30 March 2018)
78. Marr, B., 17 ‘Internet Of Things’ facts everyone should read. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2015/10/27/17-mind-blowing-internet-of-things-facts-everyone-should-read/#63c4bda63505, 2017. (Accessed 25 February 2018)
79. Martinez-Balleste, A., Pérez-Martínez, P.A., Solanas, A., The pursuit of citizens' privacy: a privacy-aware smart city is possible. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51:6 (2013), 136–141, 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525606 (June 2013).
80. Mazhelis, O., Hämäläinen, A., Asp, T., Tyrväinen, P., Towards enabling privacy preserving smart city apps. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), 2016, IEEE, 10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580755.
81. McGrath, F., Top 10 Reasons for Using Social Media. 2017, GlobalWebIndex Available at: http://blog.globalwebindex.net/chart-of-the-day/social-media/. (Accessed 30 January 2018)
82. Minkus, T., Liu, K., Ross, K.W., Children seen but not heard: when parents compromise children's online privacy. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'15), 2015, 776–786, 10.1145/2736277.2741124.
83. Moustaka, V., Vakali, A., Anthopoulos, L.G., CityDNA: smart city dimensions' correlations for identifying urban profile. Proceedings of the 26th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2017), 2017, ACM, 10.1145/3041021.3054714.
84. Moustaka, V., Vakali, A., Anthopoulos, L.G., A systematic review for smart city data analytics. ACM Comput. Surv., 2018, 10.1145/3239566.
85. Moustaka, V., Theodosiou, Z., Vakali, A., Kounoudes, A., Smart cities at risk!: privacy and security threats borderlines from social networking in cities. 2018 Web Conference Companion (WWW' 18 Companion), 2018, ACM, 10.1145/3184558.3191516.
86. Nam, T., Pardo, T.A., Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (dg.o' 11), 2011, ACM, 10.1145/2037556.2037602.
87. Netter, M., Riesner, M., Weber, M., Pernul, G., Privacy settings in online social networks - preferences, perception, and reality. Proceedings of the 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2013, IEEE, 10.1109/HICSS.2013.455.
88. Nokia, Machina Research Smart City Playbook. Available at: https://pages.nokia.com/2170.What.Are.Cities.Doing.to.Be.Smart.html, 2016. (Accessed 25 February 2018)
89. Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R., Horne, D.A., The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. J. Consum. Aff. 41:1 (2007), 100–126, 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x.
90. Notar, C.E., Padgett, S., Roden, J., Cyberbullying: resources for intervention and prevention universal. J. Educ. Res. 1:3 (2013), 133–145, 10.13189/ujer.2013.010301.
91. Nuaimi, E.A., Neyadi, H.A., Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Applications of big data to smart cities. J. Internet Serv. Appl., 6(25), 2015, 10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5.
92. O'Connor, N., Reforming the U.S. approach to data protection and privacy. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/report/reforming-us-approach-data-protection, 2018. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
93. O'Neil, D., Analysis of internet users' level of online privacy concerns. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 19 (2001), 17–31, 10.1177/089443930101900103.
94. Parsons, M., Asia Pacific data protection and cyber security guide 2017. Available at: https://www.hlmediacomms.com/2017/04/11/6461/, 2017. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
95. Patsakis, C., Zigomitros, A., Papageorgiou, A., Solanas, A., Privacy and security for multimedia content shared on OSNs: issues and countermeasures. Comput. J. 58:4 (2014), 518–535, 10.1093/comjnl/bxu066.
96. Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., Johnson, B., Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 27:1 (2014), 6–30, 10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-0011.
97. Rizzo, G., Meo, R., Pensa, R.G., Falcone, G., Troncy, R., Shaping City Neighborhoods Leveraging Crowd Sensor. Inf. Syst., 2016, 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.05.005 (July 2016).
98. Robinson, N., Graux, H., Botterman, M., Valeri, L., Review of the European Data Protection Directive. 2009, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR710.html. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
99. Saridakis, G., Benson, V., Enzingeard, J.N., Tennakoon, H., Individual information security, user behaviour and cyber victimisation: An empirical study of social networking users. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 102 (2016), 320–330, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.012.
100. SCC Europe Staff, How the EU's GDPR will be a game changer for cities using open data. Available at: https://eu.smartcitiescouncil.com/article/how-eus-gdpr-will-be-game-changer-cities-using-open-data, 2018. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
101. Schivinski, B., Dabrowski, D., The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands. J. Mark. Commun., 22(2), 2016, 10.1080/13527266.2013.871323.
102. Sheehan, K.B., Toward a typology of internet users and online privacy concerns. Inf. Soc. 18 (2002), 21–32, 10.1080/01972240252818207.
103. Shillair, R., Cotton, S.-R., Tsai, H.-Y.-S., Alhabash, S., LaRose, R., Rifon, N.-J., Online safety begins with you and me: convincing internet users to protect themselves. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48 (2015), 199–207, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.046.
104. Shin, D.H., The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: a security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interact. Comput. 22:2010 (2010), 428–438, 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.001.
105. Smart Trikala, Available at: https://trikalacity.gr/en/smart-trikala/, 2018. (Accessed 3 September 2018)
106. Smith, K., Marketing: 96 amazing social media statistics and facts. Brandwatch blog. Available at https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/96-amazing-social-media-statistics-and-facts-for-2016/, 2016. (Accessed 30 January 2018)
107. Solomon, M.G., Sunderam, V., Xiong, L., Li, M., Enabling mutually private location proximity services in smart cities: A comparative assessment. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), 2016, IEEE, 10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580757.
108. Solove, D.J., A taxonomy of privacy. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 154 (2006), 477–560, 10.2307/40041279.
109. Statista, Number of social media users worldwide from 2010 to 2021 (in billions). Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/, 2018. (Accessed 23 January 2018)
110. Stross, R., When Everyone's a Friend, is Anything Private?. 2009, N.Y. TIMES March 7, 2009, Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/business/08digi.html. (Accessed 15 March 2018)
111. Sundar, S.S., Marathe, S.S., Personalization versus customization: the importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Hum. Commun. Res. 36:3 (2010), 298–322, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x.
112. The Guardian, Inside Greece's first smart city: 'Now you don't need to know a politician to get something done. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/sep/04/trikala-greece-first-smart-city-dont-need-to-know-a-politician-to-get-something-done, 2018. (Accessed 5 September 2018)
113. Tierney, M., Spiro, I., Bregler, C., Subramanian, L., Cryptagram: Photo privacy for online social media. Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Online Social Networks (COSN'13), 2013, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75–88.
114. Townsend, A., Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. 2013, W.W. Norton & Co., New York.
115. Tsirtsis, A., Tsapatsoulis, N., Stamatelatos, M., Papadamou, K., Sirivianos, M., Cyber Security risks for minors: a taxonomy and a software architecture. Proceedings of 11th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP'16), 2016, IEEE, 10.1109/SMAP.2016.7753391.
116. Vakali, A., Angelis, L., Giatsoglou, M., Sensors talk and humans sense towards a reciprocal collective awareness smart city framework. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Communications Workshops (ICC' 13), 2013, IEEE, 189–193, 10.1109/ICCW.2013.6649226.
117. Valerio, P., Europe's GDPR slaps data collected by cities. Available at: https://citiesofthefuture.eu/europes-gdpr-slaps-data-collected-by-cities-e9118fc648ab, 2018. (Accessed 15 April 2018)
118. Yang, C., Xiao, M., Ding, X., Tian, W., Zhai, Y., Chen, J., Liu, L., Ye, X., Exploring human mobility patterns using geo-tagged social media data at the group level. J. Spat. Sci., 2018, 10.1080/14498596.2017.1421487.
119. Yao, M.Z., Rice, R.E., Wallis, K., Predicting user concerns about online privacy. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 58:5 (2007), 611–762, 10.1002/asi.20530.
120. Yin, F.S., Liu, M.L., Lin, C.-P., Forecasting the continuance intention of social networking sites: assessing privacy risk and usefulness of technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 99:2015 (2015), 267–272, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.019.
121. ZEPHORIA Digital Marketing, The Top 20 valuable Facebook statistics. Available at: https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/, 2017. (Accessed 30 January 2018)
122. Zhang, C., Sun, J., Privacy and security for online social networks: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Netw., 24(4), 2010, 10.1109/MNET.2010.5510913 (July–August 2010).
123. Zoonen, L.V., Privacy concerns in smart cities. Gov. Inf. Q. 33:3 (2016), 472–480, 10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.004 (July 2016).