Using biological criteria for establishing restoration and ecological recovery endpoints

Biological Response Signatures: Indicator Patterns Using Aquatic Communities

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 83-96

  Simon, Thomas P ^a   Rankin, Edward T ^b   Dufour, Ronda L ^c   Newhouse, Steven A ^a  

^a Indiana Department of Environmental Management   (United States)

^b OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c Dufour Consultants   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055940266     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420041453     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, G.E. Griffith, R. Frydenborg, E. McCarron, and J.S. White. 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic m macroinvertebrates, Journal North American Benthological Society, 15, 185-211.
2. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen. Unpublished. Biological criteria development for streams and rivers of Illinois using benthic macroinvertebrates. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Springfield, IL.
3. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritson, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1997. Revision to Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Rivers and Streams: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish. EPA 841-D-97-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
4. Benke, A.C. 1990. A perspective on America’s vanishing streams, Journal North American Benthological Society, 9, 77-88.
5. Butcher, J.T. 2001. The Development of Watershed Indicators in the Northern Lakes and Forests Ecoregion Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates. M.S. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
6. Cairns, J., Jr. and J.R. Pratt. 1993. A history of biological monitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates, in D.M. Rosenberg and V.H. Resh (Eds.). Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York, 10-27.
7. Cummins, K.W. and M.A. Wilzbach. 1985. Field Procedures for Analysis of Functional Feeding Groups of Stream Macroinvertebrates. Contribution 1611. Appalachian Environmental Laboratory, University of Maryland, Frostburg, MD.
8. Davis, W.S. 1995. Biological assessment and criteria: building on the past, in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (Eds.). Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 15-30.
9. Davis, W.S. and T.P. Simon. 1989. Sampling and data evaluation requirements for fish and macroinvertebrate communities, in T.P. Simon, L.L. Holst, and L.J. Shepard (Eds.). Proceedings of the 1989 Midwest Pollution Control Biologists Meeting, 14-17 February 1989. EPA 905-9-90-005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Environmental Sciences Division, Chicago, IL.
10. DeShon, J.E. 1995. Development and application of the Invertebrate Community Index (ICI), in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (Eds.). Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 217-244.
11. Fausch, K.D., Lyons, J., Karr, J.R., and Angermeier, P.L. 1990. Fish communities as indicators of environmental degradation, American Fisheries Society Symposium 8, 123-136.
12. Gammon, J.R. 1976. The Fish Populations of the Middle 340 km of the Wabash River. Purdue University Water Resources Research Center Technical Report 86, Lafayette, IN.
13. Hartig, J.H. and M.A. Zarull (Eds.). 1992. Under RAPs: Toward Grassroots Ecological Democracy in the Great Lakes Basin. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
14. Hellawell, J.M. 1986. Biological Indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management. Elsevier Press, London.
15. Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1982. Using a biotic index to evaluate water quality in streams. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin 132.
16. Hughes, R.M. 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions, in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (Eds.). Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 31-48.
17. Hughes, R.M. and T. Oberdorff. 1999. Applications of IBI concepts and metrics to waters outside the United States and Canada, in T.P. Simon (Ed.). Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 79-96.
18. Johnson, R.K., T. Wiederholm, and D.M. Rosenberg. 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring using individual organisms, populations, and species assemblages of benthic macroinvertebrates, in D.M. Rosenberg and V.H. Resh (Eds.). Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman & Hall, New York. 40-158.
19. Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27.
20. Karr, J.R., K.D. Fausch, P.L. Angermeier, P.R. Yant, and I.J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing Biological Integrity in Running Waters: A Method and Its Rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey Special Publication 5, Champaign, IL.
21. Karr, J.R. and E.W. Chu. 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
22. Karr, J.R. and D.R. Dudley. 1981. Ecological perspective on water quality goals, Environmental Management, 5, 55-68.
23. Kerans, B.L. and J.R. Karr. 1994. Development and testing of a benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley, Ecological Applications, 4 (4), 768-785.
24. Maxted, J.R., S.B. Weisberg, J.C. Chailou, R.A. Eskin, and F.W. Kutz. 1997. Ecological condition of deadend canals of the Delaware and Maryland coastal bays, Estuaries, 20, 319-327.
25. Moyle, P.B. and M.P. Marchetti. 1999. Application of indices of biotic integrity to California streams and watersheds, in T.P. Simon (Ed.). Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 367-382.
26. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Volume II. Users Manual for Biological Field Assessment of Ohio Surface Waters. Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Surface Water Section, Columbus, OH.
27. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. Ecological Recovery Endpoints for Streams Affected by the Meigs #31 Mine Discharges during July-September 1993. Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water, Ecological Assessment Section, Columbus, OH.
28. Omernik, J.M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77, 118-125.
29. Plafkin, J.L., M.T. Barbour, K.D. Porter, S.K. Gross, and R.M. Hughes. 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers. Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. EPA 440-4-89-001. Office of Water Regulation and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
30. Reash, R.J. 1999. Considerations for characterizing midwestern large river habitats, in T.P. Simon (Ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 463-474.
31. Resh, V.H. and J.K. Jackson. 1993. Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates, in D.M. Rosenberg and V.H. Resh (Eds.), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman & Hall, New York, 195-233.
32. Rosenberg, D.M. and V.H. Resh. 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Chapman & Hall, New York.
33. Rosenberg, D.M. and A.P. Wiens. 1976. Community and species responses of Chironomidae (Diptera) to contamination of fresh waters by crude oil and petroleum products, with special reference to the Trail River, Northwest Territories, Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 33, 1955-1963.
34. Simon, T.P. 1991. Development of Ecoregion Expectations for the Index of Biotic Integrity. I. Central Corn Belt Plain. EPA 905-9-91-025. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Sciences Division, Chicago, IL.
35. Simon, T.P. and E.B. Emery. 1995. Modification and assessment of an index of biotic integrity to quantify water resource quality in Great Rivers, Regulated Rivers Research and Management, 11, 283-298.
36. Simon, T.P. and J. Lyons. 1995. Application of the Index of Biotic Integrity to Evaluate Water Resource Integrity in Freshwater Ecosystems, in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (Eds.), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. 245-262.
37. Simon, T.P. and R.E. Sanders. 1999. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on Great River fish communities:considerations in sampling and interpretation, in T.P. Simon (Ed.), Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 475-505.
38. Simon, T.P. and P.M. Stewart. 1999. Structure and function of Lake Michigan fish assemblages: with emphasis on the restoration of native fish communities, Natural Areas Journal, 19, 142-154.
39. Simon, T.P., P.M. Stewart, and P.L. Rothrock. 2001. Development of an index of biotic integrity for plant assemblages (P-IBI) in southern Lake Michigan, Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 4, 293-309.
40. Simon, T.P., D.A. Sparks, R. Dufour, and S.A. Newhouse. 2000. Baseline Determination for the Grand Calumet River and Indiana Harbor Canal. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, IN.
41. Simon, T.P., S.A. Sobiech, D.A. Sparks, K. Jopp. 2002. Assessing the ecological integrity of the East Branch Grand Calumet River: response of four biological indicators, in T.P. Simon (Ed.). Biological Response Signatures: Patterns in Biological Integrity for Assessment of Freshwater Aquatic Assemblages. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
42. Sobiech, S.A., T.P. Simon, and D.A. Sparks. 1994. Preremedial Biological and Water Quality Assessment of the East Branch Grand Calumet River, Gary, IN. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, IN.
43. Stewart, P.M., P. Hudson, J.T. Butcher, and R. Hesselberg. 1998. Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Inventory in Tributaries to the Cuyahoga River at the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area. U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Michigan Ecological Research Station, Porter, IN.
44. Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm. 1994. Plants of the Chicago Region, 4th ed. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis.