Regional ecological normalization using linear models: A meta-method for scaling stream assessment indicators

Biological Response Signatures: Indicator Patterns Using Aquatic Communities

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 201-223

  Wiley, Michael J ^a   Seelbach, Paul W ^b   Wehrly, Kevin ^b   Martin, Joan S ^c  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Institute for Fisheries Research   (United States)

^c Huron River Watershed Council   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055923663     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420041453     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Angermeier, P.L. and I.J. Schlosser. 1989. Species-area relationships for stream fishes, Ecology, 70, 1450-1462.
2. Baker, E.A., K.E. Wehrly, P.W. Seelbach, M.J. Wiley, L. Wang, and T.P. Simon. 2001. Regional normalization models for assessing ecological integrity in streams of the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, R-EMAP, Final Report for Grant R-82620701-2, Duluth, MN.
3. Baker, M.E., M.J. Wiley, and P.W. Seelbach. 2001a. GIS-based hydrologic models of riparian areas: implications for stream water quality, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(6), 1-14.
4. Baker, M.E., M.J. Wiley, and P.W. Seelbach. 2001b. Spatially-Explicit Models of Groundwater Loading in Glaciated Landscapes: Considerations and Development in Lower Michigan. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Research Report, Ann Arbor, MI.
5. Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, 2nd Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Watershed, Oceans, and Wetlands, Washington, D.C.
6. Bayley P.B. and D.C. Dowling. 1993. The effect of habitat in biasing fish abundance and species richness estimates when using various sampling methods in streams, Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii, 40, 5-14.
7. Biggs, B.J.F., M.J. Duncan, I.G. Jowett, J.M. Quinn, C.W. Hickey, R.J. Davies-Colley, and M.E. Close. 1990. Ecological characterization, classification, and modelling of New Zealand rivers: an introduction and synthesis, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 24, 277-304.
8. Bowlby, J.N. and J.C. Roff. 1986. Trout biomass and habitat relationships in southern Ontario streams, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 115, 503-514.
9. Bryce, S.A. and S.E. Clark. 1996. Landscape-level ecological regions: linking state-level ecoregion frameworks with stream habitat classifications, Environmental Management, 20, 297-311.
10. Claessen, F.A. M., F. Klijn, J.P.M. Witte, and J.G. Nienhuis. 1994. Ecosystem classification and hydroecological modeling for national water management, in F. Klijn (Ed.). Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 199-222.
11. Davis, L.S. and J.A. Henderson. 1978. Many uses and many users: some desirable characteristics of a common land and water classification system, in Classification, Inventory, and Analysis of Fish and Wildlife Habitat. FWS/OBS-78/76, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C., 13-34.
12. Fausch, K.D., C.L. Hawkes, and M.G. Parsons. 1988. Models that predict standing crop of stream fish from habitat variables: 1950-85. General Technical Report PNW-GTR 213, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Field Station, Portland, OR.
13. Frey, D.G. 1977. Biological integrity of water - an historical approach, in R.K. Ballantine and L.J. Guarraia (Eds.). The Integrity of Water, Proceedings of a Symposium, March 10-12, 1975. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 127-140.
14. Gallant, A.L., T.R. Whittier, D.P. Larsen, J.M. Omernik, and R.M. Hughes. 1989. Regionalization as a Tool for Managing Environmental Resources. EPA/600/3-89/060.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR.
15. Gilliom, R.J., W.M. Alley, and M.E. Gurtz. 1995. Design of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program:Occurrence and Distribution of Water-Quality Conditions. U.S. Geological Survey, Circular 1112.
16. Hakanson, L. 1996. Predicting important lake habitat variables from maps using modern modelling tools. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53(1), 364-382.
17. Hawkins, C.P., R.H. Norris, J.N. Hogue, and J.W. Feminella. 2000. Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring the biological integrity of streams, Ecological Applications, 10, 1456-1477.
18. Hauer, F.R. and R.D. Smith. 1998. The hydrogeomorphic approach to functional assessment of riparian wetlands: evaluating impacts and mitigation on river floodplains in the U.S.A., Freshwater Biology, 40, 517-530.
19. Higgins, J., M. Lammert, M. Bryer, M. DePhilip, and D. Grossman. 1998. Freshwater Conservation in the Great Lakes Basin: Development and Application of an Aquatic Community Framework. The Nature Conservancy, Great Lakes Program Office, Final Project Report, Chicago, IL.
20. Hilsenhoff, W.L. 1988. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family level biotic index, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7, 165-68.
21. Karr, J.R. and E.W. Chu. 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Covelo, CA.
22. Karr, J.R., and D.R. Dudley. 1981. Ecological perspectives on water quality goals, Environmental Management, 5, 55-68.
23. Karr, J. R., K.D. Fausch, P.L. Angermeier, P.R. Yant, and I.J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing Biological Integrity in Running Waters: A Method and Its Rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Special Publication 5, Champaign, IL.
24. Kleiman, R. 1995. The effects of season, land use/cover, and hydrology on stream water chemistry in Michigan’s lower peninsula. M.S. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
25. Kohler, S.L. and M.J. Wiley. 1997. Pathogen outbreaks reveal large-scale effects of competition in stream communities, Ecology 87(7), 2164-2176
26. Lyons, J., L. Wang, and T.D. Simonson. 1996. Development and validation of an index of biotic integrity for coldwater streams in Wisconsin, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 16, 241-256.
27. Magnuson, J.J., B.J. Benson and T.K. Kratz. 1990. Temporal coherence in the limnoogy of a suite of lakes in Wisconsin, USA, Freshwater Biology, 23, 145-159.
28. Martin, J. S. 1998. Final 319 Report to MDEQ. Huron River Watershed Council, Report, Ann Arbor, MI.
29. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. 1997. A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters. MI/DEQ/SWQ-96/152, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Lansing. MI.
30. Mundahl, N.D. and T.P. Simon. 1999. Development and application of an Index of Biotic Integrity for coldwater streams of the upper Midwestern United States, in T.P. Simon (Ed.). Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 383-416
31. National Research Council. 1995. Review of EPA’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program:Overall Evaluation. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
32. Norris, R.H. and A. Georges. 1993. Analysis and interpretation of benthic macroinvertebrate surveys, in D.M. Rosenberg and V.H. Resh (Eds). Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinverterates. Chapman & Hall, New York, 234-286
33. Osborne, L.L. and M.J. Wiley. 1988. Empirical relationships between land use/cover and stream water quality in an agricultural watershed, Environmental Management, 26, 9-27.
34. Osborne, L.L. and M.J. Wiley. 1992. The influence of tributary spatial position on the structure of warmwater fish communities, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 671-681.
35. Osborne, L.L., S.L. Kohler, P.B. Bayley, D. Day, W. Bertrand, M.J. Wiley, and R. Sauer. 1992. Influence of stream spatial location in a drainage network on the Index of Biotic Integrity, Transaction of the American Fisheries Society, 121, 635-643.
36. Reynoldson, T.B., R.H. Norris, V.H. Resh, K.E. Day, and D.M. Rosenberg. 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 16, 833-852.
37. Seelbach, P.W., R.N. Lockwood, and J.R. Ryckman. 1994. Efficiency of Sampling River Fishes with Rotenone. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Research Report 2009, Ann Arbor, MI.
38. Seelbach, P.W. and M.J. Wiley. 1997. Overview of the Michigan Rivers Inventory Project. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Technical Report 97-3, Ann Arbor, MI.
39. Seelbach, P.W., M.J. Wiley, P.A. Soranno, and M.T. Bremigan. 2002. Aquatic conservation planning: using landscape maps to predict ecological reference conditions for specific waters, in K. Gutzwiller (Ed.), Concepts and Applications of Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation. Springer-Verlag, New York, Chapter 25.
40. Simpson, J. and R.H. Norris. In press. Biological assessment of water quality: development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs, in J.F. Wright, D.W. Sutcliffe, and M.T. Furse (Eds). RIVPACS and Similar Techniques for Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters. Freshwater Biological Association and Environmental Agency, U.K.
41. Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman, New York.
42. Sowa, S.P. 1999. Implementing the Aquatic Component of Gap Analysis in Riverine Environments: A Training Workbook. Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership, Columbia, MO.
43. Turak E., L.K. Flack, R.H. Norris, J. Simpson, and N. Waddell. 1999. Assessment of river condition at a large spatial scale using predictive models, Freshwater Biology, 41, 283-298.
44. Urquhart, N.S., W.S. Overton, and D.S. Birkes. 1993. Comparing sampling designs for monitoring ecological status and trends: impact of temporal patterns, in V. Barnett and K. Tuchman. (Eds.). Statistics for the Environment, John Wiley & Sons, London, 71-85.
45. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. EMAP Surface Waters Monitoring and Research Strategy. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA, Office of Research and Development, Pacific Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR.
46. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment, EPA/630/R-95/002F.
47. USEPA. Office of Research and Development, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, D.C.
48. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Research Strategy. EPA/620/R-98/001. USEPA, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
49. Ward, R.C. 1996. Water quality monitoring: where’s the beef? American Water Resources Association, 32, 673-680.
50. Wehrly, K.E. 1999. The influence of thermal regime on the distribution and abundance of stream fishes in Michigan, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
51. Wehrly, K.E., M.J. Wiley, and P.W. Seelbach. 1998. Landscape-based models that predict July thermal characteristics of lower Michigan rivers. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Research Report 2037, Ann Arbor, MI.
52. Wehrly, K.E., M.J. Wiley, and P.W. Seelbach. 2002. Classifying regional variation in thermal regime using stream fish community patterns, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. In press.
53. Wiley, M. and J. Martin. 2000. Current conditions, recent changes, and major threats to the Huron River: a report based on eight years of citizen monitoring. Huron River Watershed Council, Ann Arbor, MI. http://rivers.snre.umich.edu/mri/huron/hrwcrpt/index.htm.
54. Wiley, M.J. and P.W. Seelbach. In press. Hydrology of rivers in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Research Report 2039, Ann Arbor, MI.
55. Wiley, M.J., S.L. Kohler, and P.W. Seelbach. 1997. Reconciling landscape and site based views of aquatic stream communities, Freshwater Biology, 37, 133-148.
56. Wiley, M.J., P.W. Seelbach, and S.P. Bowler. 1998. Ecological Targets for Rehabilitation of the Rouge River. Final Report RPO-PI-SR21.00, Rouge Project Office, Wayne County, MI.
57. Wright, J.F., P.D. Armitage, M.T. Furse, and D. Moss. 1988. A new approach to the biological surveillance of river quality using macroinvertebrates, Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewande Limnolgie, 23, 1548-1552.
58. Wright, J.F., P.D. Armitage, M.T. Furse, and D. Moss. 1989. Prediction of invertebrate communities using stream measurements, Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 4, 147-155.
59. Yoder, C.O. and E.T. Rankin. 1995. Biological criteria program development and implementation in Ohio, in W.S Davis and T.P. Simon (Eds.). Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 109-144.
60. Zonneveld, I.S. 1994. Basic principles of classification, in F. Klijn (Ed.). Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 23-47.
61. Zorn, T.G., P.W. Seelbach, and M.J. Wiley. 2002. Distributions of stream fishes and their relationship to stream size and hydrology in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 131, 70-85.