Land Redevelopment and the Built Environment in Third-Wave Cities: Review and Synthesis

Journal of Urban Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 57-81

  Scott, Allen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Built environment; financialization; land use change; third wave cities; urban redevelopment

Indexed keywords

FINANCIAL SYSTEM; LAND MARKET; LAND USE CHANGE; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85055888848     PISSN: 10630732     EISSN: 14661853     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2018.1537050     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. M., Aalbers, Subprime Cities: The Political Economy of Mortgage Markets (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).
2. M., Aalbers, “The Variegated Financialization of Housing,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41 (2017) 542–554. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12522
3. A.V., Anttiroiko, The Political Economy of City Branding (Oxford: Routledge, 2014).
4. P., Ashton, “An Appetite for Yield: The Anatomy of the Subprime Mortgage Crisis,” Environment and Planning A 41 (2009) 1420–1441. doi: 10.1068/a40328
5. M., Ball, “The Built Environment and the Urban Question,” Environment and Planning D 4 (1986) 447–464.
6. R., Barras, “Property and the Economic Cycle: Building Cycles Revisited,” Journal of Property Research 11 (1994) 183–197. doi: 10.1080/09599919408724116
7. R., Barras and D., Ferguson, “A Spectral Analysis of Building Cycles in Britain,” Environment and Planning A 17 (1985) 1369–1391. doi: 10.1068/a171369
8. R.A., Beauregard, “Capital Switching and the Built Environment: United States 1970–1989,” Environment and Planning A 26 (1994) 715–732. doi: 10.1068/a260715
9. N.K., Blomley, Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property (London: Routledge, 2003).
10. L., Bonneval and J., Pollard, “Promoteurs Immobiliers, Bailleurs Sociaux, Collectivités Locales: Des Acteurs aux Frontières des Marchés du Logement,” Métropoles 20 (2017) 1–15.
11. N., Brenner, “Urban Governance and the Production of New State Spaces in Western Europe,” Review of International Political Economy 11 (2004) 447–488. doi: 10.1080/0969229042000282864
12. G., Bridge, “Bourdieu Rational Action and the Time-Space Strategy of Gentrification,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26 (2001) 205–216. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00015
13. J.K., Brueckner, “A Vintage Model of Urban Growth,” Journal of Urban Economics 8 (1980) 389–402. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(80)90039-X
14. D., Capozza and Y., Li, “The Intensity and Timing of Investment: The Case of Land,” American Economic Review 84 (1994) 889–904.
15. P.C., Cheshire, M., Nathan, and H.G., Overman, Urban Economics and Urban Policy: Challenging Conventional Policy Wisdom (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014).
16. B., Christophers, “Revisiting the Urbanization of Capital,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (2011) 1347–1364. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.583569
17. B., Christophers, “The Limits to Financialization,” Dialogues in Human Geography 5 (2015) 185–200.
18. E., Clark, “On Blindness Centerpieces and Complementarity in Gentrification Theory,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 17 (1992) 358–362. doi: 10.2307/622886
19. E., Clark, “The Order and Simplicity of Gentrification: A Political Challenge,” in R., Atkinson and G., Bridge, eds, Gentrification in A Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism (London: Routledge, 2005) 261–269.
20. N., Crosby and J., Henneberry, “Financialization Valuation of Investment Property and the Urban Built Environment in the UK,” Urban Studies 53 (2016) 1424–1441. doi: 10.1177/0042098015583229
21. E., Currid-Halkett and A.J., Scott, “The Geography of Celebrity and Glamour: Economy Culture and Desire in the City,” City Culture and Society 4 (2013) 2–11.
22. A.R., Cuthbert, The Form of Cities: Political Economy and Urban Design (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006).
23. K., Dinnie, City Branding: Theory and Cases (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).
24. S., Dörry, M., Rosol, and F., Thissen, “The Significance of Creative Industry Policy Narratives for Zürich’s Transformation Toward A Post-Industrial City,” Cities 58 (2016) 137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.022
25. G., Dymski, “Subprime Crisis and Urban Problematic,” in M.B., Aalbers, ed., Subprime Cities: The Political Economy of Mortgage Markets (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).
26. N., Fainstein and S.S., Fainstein, “The Changing Character of Urban Redevelopment,” in R., Crane and R., Weber, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) 587–608.
27. S.S., Fainstein, The City Builders: Property Development in New York and London 1980–2000 (Lawrence: Kansas University Press, 2001).
28. R., Fernandez and M.B., Aalbers, “Financialization and Housing: Between Globalization and Varieties of Capitalism,” Competition and Change 20 (2016) 71–88. doi: 10.1177/1024529415623916
29. E., Folmer and R.C., Kloosterman, “Emerging Intra-Urban Geographies of the Cognitive-Cultural Economy: Evidence from Residential Neighbourhoods in Dutch Cities,” Environment and Planning A 49 (2017) 801–818. doi: 10.1177/0308518X16684826
30. R., Glass, “Aspects of Change,” in London: Aspects of Change, Centre for Urban Studies Report No. 3 (London: Macgibbon & Kee, 1964).
31. K.F., Gothan, “Creating Liquidity out of Spatial Fixity: The Secondary Circuit of Capital and the Restructuring of the US Housing Finance System,” in M.B., Aalbers, ed., Subprime Cities: The Political Economy of Mortgage Markets (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012) 25–52.
32. A, Guironnet, K., Attuyer, and L., Halbert, “Building Cities on Financial Assets: The Financialization of Property Markets and its Implications for City Governments in the Paris City-Region,” Urban Studies 53 (2016) 1442–1464. doi: 10.1177/0042098015576474
33. S., Guy and J., Henneberry, Development and Developers: Perspective on Property (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002).
34. J., Hackworth, The Neoliberal City: Governance Ideology and Development in American Urbanism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007).
35. A., Haila, Urban Land Rent: Singapore as a Property State (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016).
36. L., Halbert and K., Attuyer, “Introduction: The Financialization of Urban Production: Conditions Mediations and Transformations,” Urban Studies 53 (2016) 1347–1361. doi: 10.1177/0042098016635420
37. P.G., Hall and K., Pain, The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-City Regions in Europe (London: Routledge, 2009).
38. C., Hamnett, “The Blind Men and the Elephant: The Explanation of Gentrification,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 16 (1991) 173–189. doi: 10.2307/622612
39. C., Hamnett, “Gentrification and the Middle-Class Remaking of Inner London 1961–2001,” Urban Studies 40 (2003) 2401–2426. doi: 10.1080/0042098032000136138
40. D., Harvey, The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985).
41. D., Harvey, “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism,” Geografiska Annaler 71 B (1989) 3–17. doi: 10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
42. D., Harvey, “The Urban Roots of Financial Crises: Reclaiming the City for Anti-Capitalist Struggle,” Socialist Register (Pontypool: Merlin Press, 2012) 1–35.
43. S., He, “New-Build Gentrification in Central Shanghai: Demographic Changes and Socioeconomic Implications,” Population Space and Place 16 (2010) 345–361.
44. H., Hoyt, One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago: The Relationship of the Growth of Chicago to the Rise of its Land Values 1830–1833 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1933).
45. R.M., Hurd, Principles of City Land Values (New York: Record & Guide, 1903).
46. T.A., Hutton, The New Economy of the Inner City: Restructuring Regeneration and Dislocation in the Twenty-First Century Metropolis (London: Routledge, 2008).
47. A., Jadevicius, B., Sloan, and A., Brown, “Century of Research on Property Cycles: A Literature Review,” International Journal of Strategic Property 21 (2017) 129–143. doi: 10.3846/1648715X.2016.1255273
48. M., Kaika, “Architecture and Crisis: Reinventing the Icon Reimag(In)Ing London and Rebranding the City,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 36 (2010) 453–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00398.x
49. M., Kaika, “Land Financialization as a Lived Process: The Transformation of Milan’s Bicocca by Pirelli,” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (2016) 3–22. doi: 10.1177/0969776413484166
50. R., Keil, Suburban Planet: Making the World Urban from the Outside In (Cambridge: Polity, 2018).
51. K.H., Kim and B., Renaud, “The Global House-Price Boom and Its Unwinding: An Analysis and A Commentary,” Housing Studies 24 (2009) 7–24. doi: 10.1080/02673030802550128
52. R., Kling, S., Olin, and M., Poster, Postsuburban California the Transformation of Orange County Since World War II (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991)
53. E. E., Leamer, “Housing Really Is the Business Cycle: What Survives the Lessons of 2008–09?” Journal of Money Credit and Banking Supplement to vol. 47 (2015) 43–50. doi: 10.1111/jmcb.12189
54. L., Lees, T., Slater, and E., Wyly, Gentrification (London: Routledge, 2007).
55. L., Lees, H.B., Shin, and E., López-Morales, eds, Global Gentrifications (Bristol: Policy Press, 2015).
56. D., Ley, “Explanations for Inner-City Gentrification: A Canadian Assessment,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 76 (1986) 521–535. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1986.tb00134.x
57. G.C.S., Lin and A.Y., Zhang, “China’s Metropolises in Transformation: Neoliberalizing Politics Land Commodification and Uneven Development in Beijing,” Urban Geography 38 (2017) 643–665. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1139407
58. Y., Liu, P., Fan, W., Yue, and Y., Song, “Impacts of Land Finance on Urban Sprawl in China: The Case of Chongqing,” Land Use Policy 72 (2018) 420–432.
59. A., Maclaren, “Masters of Space: The Property Development Sector,” in A., Maclaren, ed., Making Space: Property Development and Urban Planning (London: Arnold, 2003) 7–62.
60. A., Marshall, Principles of Economics (London: Macmillan, 1890).
61. J.R., Miron, The Organization of Cities: Initiative Ordinary Life and the Good Life (Cham: Springer, 2017).
62. H., Molotch, “The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place,” American Journal of Sociology 82 (1976) 309–33. doi: 10.1086/226311
63. H.J., Munneke, “Redevelopment Decisions for Commercial and Industrial Properties,” Journal of Urban Economics 39 (1996) 229–253. doi: 10.1006/juec.1996.0013
64. D.M., Nowlan, “The Land Market: How It Works,” in L.B., Smith and M., Walker, eds, Public Property? (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1977) 3–37.
65. P., O’Neil, “The Financialization of Urban Infrastructure: A Framework for Analysis,” Urban Studies (2018) doi 10.1177/0042098017751983.
66. J., Pacewicz, “Tax Increment Financing Economic Development Professionals and the Financialization of Urban Politics,” Socio-Economic Review 11 (2013) 413–440. doi: 10.1093/ser/mws019
67. N.A., Phelps, Sequel to Suburbia: Glimpses of America’s Suburban Future (Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2015).
68. D., Ponzini and M., Nastasi, Starchitecture: Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities (Turin: Umberto Allemandi, 2011).
69. E., Preteceille, Production des Grands Ensembles (Paris: Mouton, 1973).
70. M., Raco and T.M., De Souza, “Urban Development Small Business Communities and the Entrepreneurialisation of English Local Government,” Town Planning Review 89 (2018) 145–165. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2018.9
71. S., Rosenthal and R.W., Helsey, “Redevelopment and the Urban Land Price Gradient,” Journal of Urban Economics 35 (1994) 182–200. doi: 10.1006/juec.1994.1012
72. S.T., Roweis and A. J., Scott, “The Urban Land Question,” in K., Cox, ed., Urbanization and Conflict in Market Societies (Chicago: Maaroufa, 1978) 38–73.
73. A., Roy, “The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory,” Regional Studies 43 (2009) 819–830. doi: 10.1080/00343400701809665
74. T., Rutland, “The Financialization of Urban Redevelopment,” Geography Compass 4 (2010) 1167–1178.
75. R.J., Sampson, Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012).
76. F., Savini and M.B., Aalbers, “The Decontextualization of Land-Use Planning through Financialization: Urban Redevelopment in Milan,” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (2016) 878–894. doi: 10.1177/0969776415585887
77. H., Schmid, W.D., Dietrich, and J., Urry, Cities and Fascination: Beyond the Surplus of Meaning (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011).
78. A.J., Scott, “Land Use and Commodity Production,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 6 (1976) 147–160.
79. A.J., Scott, The Urban Land Nexus and the State (London: Pion, 1980).
80. A.J., Scott, “Emerging Cities of the Third Wave,” City: Analysis of Urban Trends Culture Theory Policy Action 15 (2011) 289–321. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2011.595569
81. A.J., Scott, The Constitution of the City: Economy Society and Urbanization in the Capitalist Era (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).
82. A.J., Scott, “Residential Adjustment and Gentrification in Los Angeles 2000–2015: Theoretical Arguments and Empirical Evidence,” Urban Geography early view available at https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1500253 (2018)
83. A.J., Scott and M., Storper, “The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (2015) 1–15. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12134
84. L., Sklair, “The Transnational Capitalist Class and Contemporary Architecture in Globalizing Cities,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (2005) 485–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00601.x
85. L., Sklair, “Iconic Architecture and the Culture-Ideology of Consumerism,” Theory Culture and Society 27 (2010) 135–159. doi: 10.1177/0263276410374634
86. T., Slater, “The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (2006) 737–757. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00689.x
87. T., Slater, “A Literal Necessity to Be Re-Placed: A Rejoinder to the Gentrification Debate,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2008) 212–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00781.x
88. N., Smith, “Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital Not People,” Journal of the American Planning Association 45 (1979) 538–548. doi: 10.1080/01944367908977002
89. N., Smith, “Gentrification and the Rent Gap,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77 (1987) 462–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00171.x
90. P., Sraffa, Production of Commodities By Means of Commodities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960).
91. C.N., Stone, “The Study of Politics and Urban Development,” in C.N., Stone and H.T., Sanders, eds, The Politics of Urban Development (Lawrence: Kansas University Press, 1987) 3–24.
92. M., Storper and A.J., Scott, “Current Debates in Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment,” Urban Studies 53 (2016) 1114–1136. doi: 10.1177/0042098016634002
93. J.C., Teaford, Post-Suburbia: Government and Politics in Edge Cities (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).
94. C., Topalov, Les Promoteurs Immobiliers: Contribution à l’Analyse de la Production Capitaliste en France (Paris: Mouton, 1974).
95. L., Wacquant, “Relocating Gentrification: The Working Class, Science and the State in Recent Urban Research,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2008) 198–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00774.x
96. R., Waldron, “Capitalizing on the State: The Political Economy of Real Estate Investment Trusts and the Resolution of the Crisis,” Geoforum 90 (2018) 206–218. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.014
97. R., Weber, “Selling City Futures: The Financialization of Urban Redevelopment Policy,” Economic Geography 86 (2010) 251–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2010.01077.x
98. R., Weber, From Boom to Bubble: How Finance Built the New Chicago (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2015).
99. J.T., Williams, “Redevelopment of Real Assets,” Real Estate Economics 25 (1997) 387–407. doi: 10.1111/1540-6229.00720
100. F., Wu, “Emerging Chinese Cities: Implications for Global Urban Studies,” The Professional Geographer 68 (2016) 338–348. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2015.1099189
101. F., Wu and N.A., Phelps, “(Post)Suburban Development and State Entrepreneurialism in Beijing’s Outer Suburbs,” Environment and Planning A 43 (2011) 410–430. doi: 10.1068/a43125
102. J., Zacharias and W., Yang, “A Short History of the Chinese Central Business District,” Planning Perspectives 4 (2016) 611–633.
103. S., Zukin, Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982).