Container port choice and container port performance criteria: A case study on the ceres paragon terminal in amsterdam

Intelligent Freight Transportation

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 87-106

  Kroon, Rutger ^a   Vis, Iris F A ^b  

^a JF Hillebrand   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055848151     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Amsterdam Port Authority. 2005. Eerste Klant voor Ceres Paragon container terminal Amsterdam. Press release May 30, 2005
2. Kroon, R. 2004. Seriously Ceres: The port of Amsterdam positioned in the competi-tive North-west European container port. MSc thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3. Veldman, S. J., and Bückmann, E. H. 2003. A model on container port competition: An application for the West European container hub-ports. Maritime Economies & Logistics5:3-22
4. Lirn, T. H., Thanopoulou, H. A., Beynon, M. J., Beresford, B and A. K. C. 2004. An application of AHP on transhipment port selection: A global perspective. Maritime Economies & Logistics6:70-91
5. Song, D.-W., and Yeo, K.-T. 2004. A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Maritime Economics & Logistics6:34-52
6. Notteboom, T. E. 2002. The interdependence between liner shipping networks and intermodal networks. Paper presented at Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Panama City, Panama
7. Wang, T.-F., Song, D.-W., and Cullinane, K. 2002. The applicability of data envelop-ment analysis to efficiency measurement of container ports. Paper presented at Pro-ceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Panama City, Panama
8. Sowinski, L. 2002. King of the hill doesn’t always mean prince of ports. World Trade15:40-42
9. Langen, P. W., van der Lugt, L., and Eenhuizen, J. H. A. 2002. A stylised container port hierarchy: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Paper presented at Proceedings of the International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), Panama City, Panama
10. Temmerman, W. C. J. 2002. Problematische scheepvaartpassages op het Noordzee-kanaal. MSc thesis, Technic University, Delft, the Netherlands
11. CPB (Centraal Plan Bureau). 2003. Beknopte analyse van de overslag in de Amster-damse haven. CPB note to Ministry of Verkeer and Waterstaat. www.cpb.nl
12. Amsterdam Port Authority. http://www.amsterdamport.nl (accessed June 2004)
13. Amsterdam Port Authority. http://www.amsterdamport.nl (accessed September 2006)
14. Ceres C. http://www.ceresglobal.nl (accessed June 2004)
15. Bonnes, K. 2004. Interview with tug boat captain of Svitek Weismuller. December. Amsterdam, the Netherlands
16. CPB (Centraal Plan Bureau). 2001. Analyse zeetong Noordzeekanaalgebied: een second opinion. CPB note to Rijkswaterstaat Noord-Holland. http://www.cpb.nl
17. van Oord, G. 2004. Interview with logistics manager with the Amsterdam Port Authority. Amsterdam, the Netherlands
18. Koopmans C. C. 2003. De baten van de sluis: nieuwe inzichten, Stichting voor Economisch Onderzoek der Universiteit van Amsterdam (SEO). Publication 684, Amsterdam Port Authority
19. Drewry Shipping Consultants. 2003. The annual review of global container terminal operators.Drewry: London
20. Zeetoegang IJmuiden. http://www.zeetoegangijmuiden.nl (accessed September 2006)
21. Rotterdams Dagblad, het. 2004. P&O Nedlloyd gelooft niet in Ceres
22. Verberckmoes, S. 2005. Grand alliance en New World Alliance bundelen krachten, pp. 1- 14. Nieuwsblad NT Transport