What is a Loss?

Emerging Issues in Tort Law

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 441-466

  Tettenborn, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055471900     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. HLA Hart, ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593.
2. J Raz, The Morality of Freedom, (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1986) 165-92
3. S Perry, ‘Harm, History, and Counterfactuals’ (2003) 40 San Diego Law Review 1283, 1307-8
4. M Radin, ‘Compensation and Commensurability’ (1993) 43 Duke Law Journal 56
5. R Sunstein, ‘Incommensurability and Valuation in Law’ (1994) 92 Michigan Law Review 779.
6. E A Farnsworth, Contracts, 3rd edn (New York, Aspen, 2004) § 12.17.
7. P Malaurie and L Aynès, Droit Civil—Les Obligations (Paris, Cujas, 1994) § 247.
8. L Jaffe, ‘Damages for Personal Injury: The Impact of Insurance’ (1953) 18 Law & Contemporary Problems 219, 224
9. F Oditah, ‘Takeovers, Share Exchanges and the Meaning of Loss’ (1996) 112 LQR 424.
10. C Hawes, ‘Damages for Defective Goods’ (2005) 121 LQR 389.
11. A Burrows, The Law of Restitution, 2nd edn (London, Butterworths, 2002) 471-72
12. J Edelman, Gain-based damages: Contract, Tort, Equity and Intellectual Property (Oxford, Hart, 2002) ch 3.
13. W Bowstead and F Reynolds, Agency, 17th edn (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2001)
14. R Wright, ‘Causation in Tort Law’ 73 California Law Review (1985) 1735, 1738.
15. J Stapleton, ‘Legal cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences’ (2001) 54 Vanderbilt Law Review 941
16. J Stapleton, ‘Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences’ (2003) 119 LQR 388.
17. A Tettenborn, ‘Non-Pecuniary Loss: the Right Answer but Bad Reasoning?’ (2003) 2 Journal of Obligations & Remedies 94.
18. P Bell, ‘Analyzing tort law: the flawed promise of neocontract’ (1990) 74 Minnesota Law Review 1177, 1236
19. J Goldberg, ‘Harm, Injury, and Proximate Cause’ (2003) 40 San Diego Law Review 1315, 1330-32.
20. R Epstein, ‘Are Values Incommensurable, or is Utility the Ruler of the World?’ (1995) Utah Law Review 683
21. M Geistfeld, ‘Putting a Price on Pain and Suffering’ (1995) 83 California Law Review 773.
22. D Fellman, ‘Note: Unreason in the Law of Damages: the Collateral Source Rule’ (1964) 77 Harvard Law Review 741
23. J Fleming, ‘The Collateral Source Rule and Loss Allocation in Tort Law’ (1966) 54 California Law Review 1478.
24. H Street, Principles of the Law of Damages, (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1962) 44-55
25. H Luntz, Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury and Death, 4th edn (Sydney, Butterworths, 2002) ch 5