European Union Poverty Assessment: A Capability Perspective

Journal of Human Development

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 359-383

  Volkert, Juergen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Amartya Sen; Capabilities; European Union; Poverty

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055359807     PISSN: 14699516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649880600815933     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alkire, S., 2002. Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Anand, S., and Sen, A., 2000. ‘The income component of the Human Development Index’,. Journal of Human Development, 1: pp. 83–106.
3. Andreß, H.‐J., 2003. “ ‘Resources, standard of living and Lebenslagen’, ”. In Reporting on Income Distribution and Poverty, Edited by: Hauser, R, and Becker, I, (Eds). Berlin: Springer. in
4. Arndt, C., and Volkert, J., 2006. ‘Amartya Sen’s Capability‐Approach — ein neues Konzept der deutschen Armuts‐ und Reichtumsberichterstattung’,. DIW‐Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 75(1): pp. 7–29.
5. Atkinson, A. B., 2003. “ ‘Developing comparable indicators for monitoring social inclusion in the European Union’, ”. In Reporting on Income Distribution and Poverty, Edited by: Hauser, R, and Becker, I, (Eds). Berlin: Springer. in
6. Atkinson, T., Cantillon, B., Marlier, E., and Nolan, B., 2002. Social Indicators. The E.U. and Social Inclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Atkinson, A. B., Cantillon, C., Marlier, E., and Nolan, B., 2005a. Taking Forward the E.U. Social Inclusion Process, Independent Report commissioned by the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council of the European Union, final version, Luxembourg, 31 July
8. Atkinson, A. B., Cantillon, C., Marlier, E., and Nolan, B., 2005b. Taking Forward the E.U. Social Inclusion Process, Independent Report commissioned by the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council of the European Union, final version, Annexes, Luxembourg, 31 July
9. Estes, R. J., 2002. “ ‘“Poverties” and wealth: competing definitions and alternative approaches to measurement’, ”. In Rich and Poor. Disparities, Perceptions and Concomitants, Edited by: Glatzer, W, (Ed). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. in
10. Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security and (Ed). 2004. National Action Plan against Poverty and Social Exclusion 2003–2005, Bonn update 2004
11. German National Parliament and (Ed). 2005. Deutscher Bundestag, Zweiter Armuts‐ und Reichtumsbericht, Berlin Drucksache 15/5015
12. Gordon, D., 2000. “ ‘Measuring absolute and overall poverty’, ”. In Breadline Europe, Edited by: Gordon, D, and Townsend, P, (Eds). Bristol: The Policy Press. in
13. Gordon, D., Pantazis, C., and Townsend, P., 2000. “ ‘Absolute and overall poverty: a European history and proposal for measurement’, ”. In Breadline Europe, Edited by: Gordon, D, and Townsend, P, (Eds). Bristol: The Policy Press. in
14. Gordon, D., and Townsend, P., (Eds). 2000. Breadline Europe, Bristol: The Policy Press.
15. Hagenaars, A. J. M., 1985. The Perception of Poverty, Alblasserdam
16. Hagenaars, A. J. M., de Vos, K., and Zaidi, A., 1998. “ ‘Patterns of poverty in Europe’, ”. In The Distribution of Welfare and Household Production: an International Perspective, Edited by: Jenkins, S. P, Kapteyn, A, and van Praag, B. M. S, (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. in
17. Kuklys, W., 2005a. “ ‘Armuts‐ und Ungleichheitsanalyse in Großbritannien. Vorschläge zur Operationalisierung von Sens Capability‐Ansatz’, ”. In Armut und Reichtum an Verwirklichungschancen. Amartya Sens Capability‐Konzept als Grundlage der Armuts‐ und Reichtumsberichterstattung, Edited by: Volkert, J, (Ed). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. in
18. Kuklys, W., 2005b. Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach. Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications, Berlin: Springer.
19. Nolan, B., 2003. “ ‘Measuring and targeting poverty in Ireland’, ”. In Reporting on Income Distribution and Poverty, Edited by: Hauser, R, and Becker, I, (Eds). Berlin: Springer. in
20. Robeyns, I., 2005. ‘The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey’,. Journal of Human Development, 6: pp. 93–114.
21. Schneider, F., and Volkert, J., 2005. “ ‘Politische Chancen, Armut und Reichtum’, ”. In Armut und Reichtum an Verwirklichungschancen. Amartya Sens Capability‐Konzept als Grundlage der Armuts‐ und Reichtumsberichterstattung, Edited by: Volkert, J, (Ed). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. in
22. Scholtes, F., 2005. ‘Ensure environmental sustainability: MDG7 and the Capability Approach’,. Maytreyee. Newsletter of the Human Development and Capability Association, 2: pp. 8–9.
23. Sen, A., 1981. Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
24. Sen, A., 1983. ‘Poor, relatively speaking’,. Oxford Economic Papers, 35: pp. 153–169.
25. Sen, A., 1985. ‘A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: a reply to Professor Peter Townsend’,. Oxford Economic Papers, 37: pp. 669–676.
26. Sen, A., 1987. The Standard of Living, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Sen, A., 1992. Inequality Rexamined, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
28. Sen, A., 1997. ‘Inequality, unemployment and contemporary Europe’,. International Labour Review, 136: pp. 155–171.
29. Sen, A., 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Townsend, P., 1979. Poverty in the United Kingdom. A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
31. Townsend, P., 1985. ‘A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty — a rejoinder to Professor Amartya Sen’,. Oxford Economic Papers, 37: pp. 659–668.
32. Townsend, P., 1993. The International Analysis of Poverty, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
33. UNEP/iisd and (Eds). 2004. Exploring the Links: Human Well‐Being Poverty and Ecosystem Services, Nairobi, Kenia and Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: The United Nations Environment Programme/International Institute for Sustainable Development.
34. van den Bosch, K., 2001. Identifying the Poor. Using Subjective and Consensual Measures, Aldershot: Ashgate.
35. van Praag, B. M. S., 2004. The connexion between old and new approaches to financial satisfaction, CESifo Working Paper No. 1212, June, Cesifo Munich
36. Volkert, J., 2005a. “ ‘Armut als Mangel an Verwirklichungschancen (‘capability deprivation’). Ein Adäquater Methoden‐Ansatz’, ”. In Armut und Reichtum an Verwirklichungschancen. Amartya Sens Capability‐Konzept als Grundlage der Armuts‐ und Reichtumsberichterstattung, Edited by: Volkert, J, (Ed). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. in
37. Volkert, J., 2005b. “ ‘Das Capability‐Konzept als Basis der deutschen Armuts‐ und Reichtumsberichterstattung’, ”. In Armut und Reichtum an Verwirklichungschancen. Amartya Sens Capability‐Konzept als Grundlage der Armuts‐ und Reichtumsberichterstattung, Edited by: Volkert, J, (Ed). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. in
38. Volkert, J., Klee, G., Kleimann, R., Scheurle, U., and Schneider, F., 2004. Operationalisierung der Armuts‐ und Reichtumsberichterstattung, Berlin and Tuebingen: IAW study on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Health and Social Security.