Configurationality in the languages of New Guinea

Australian Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 181-218

  Donohue, Mark ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055307154     PISSN: 07268602     EISSN: 14692996     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07268600500233001     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aissen, JL. 1992. ‘Topic and focus in Mayan’ Language, 68 (1): 43–80.
2. Andrews, A. 1985. “ ‘The major functions of the noun phrase’ ”. In Language Typology and syntactic description: Volume I, clause structure, Edited by: Shopen, T. 62–154. Cambridge University Press.
3. Barclay, P. nd (±1990). Western Dani Dictionary, Bokondini: RBMU.
4. Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical Functional Syntax, Oxford: Blackwells.
5. Bromley HM, 1961 The phonology of Lower Grand Valley Dani: a comparative structural study of skewed phonemic patterns. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. Martinus Nijhoff Den Haag.
6. Bromley, HM. 1981. A Grammar of Lower Grand Valley Dani, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics C-63.
7. Brown, L. 1997. “ ‘Nominal mutation in Nias’ ”. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Editions, Edited by: Odé, C, and Stokhof, W. 395–413. Amsterdam: Rodopi B. V.
8. Bruce, L. 1984. The Alamblak language of Papua New Guinea (East Sepik), Canberra: Pacific Linguistics C-81.
9. Butt, M. 1995. The structure of complex predicates in Urdu, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
10. Butt M, and Lahiri A, nd ±2000 Historical stability vs. historical change. Unpublished thesis, University of Konstanz.
11. Chafe, W. 1980. “ ‘The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative’ ”. In The Pear Stories, Edited by: Chafe, W. 9–50. New York: Ablex.
12. Choi, H-W. 1999. Optimizing structure in context: scrambling and information structure, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
13. Comrie, B. 1978. “ ‘Ergativity’ ”. In Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language, Edited by: Lehmann, WP. 329–394. Sussex: The Harvester Press.
14. Comrie, B. 1988. “ ‘Coreference and conjunction reduction in grammar and discourse’ ”. In Explaining language universals, Edited by: Hawkins, JA. 186–208. Oxford: Blackwells.
15. Crowther M, 1999 Subject and object verbal morphology in Lani. Unpublished thesis, University of Sydney.
16. Davies HJ, 1981 Kobon. Lingua descriptiva series No. 3. Croom Helm London.
17. Davies HJ, 1985 Kobon syntax PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
18. Dommel, PR, and GE. 1991. “ ‘Kaure Phonology’ ”. In Workpapers in Indonesian languages and Cultures 9, Edited by: Hartzler, M, and Wood, L. 1–68. Jayapura: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
19. Donohue M, 1997 Incorporation? Talk given at McGill University, Montréal, Québec, 6 November 1997.
20. Donohue M, 1998 Incorporation alternatives. Talk given at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, 14 September 1998.
21. Donohue M, 1999 A Grammar of Tukang Besi Grammar Library series No. 20 Mouton de Gruyter Berlin.
22. Donohue, C, and Donohue, M. 1997. ‘Fore case marking’ Language and Linguistics in Melanesia, 28 (1&2): 69–98.
23. Dryer MS, 1996 Grammatical Relations in Ktunaxa (Kutenai). The Belcourt Lecture delivered before the University of Manitoba on 24 February 1995. Voices of Rupert's Land. Winnipeg, Canada.
24. Falk, Y. 2000. “ ‘Pivots and the theory of grammatical functions’ ”. In Proceedings of the LFG00 conference, University of California at Berkeley, Edited by: Butt, M, and Holloway King, T. 123–139. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
25. Finer, DL. 1985. ‘The syntax of switch-reference’ Linguistic Inquiry’, 16 (1): 35–55.
26. Foley WA, 1985 Anaphor and switch reference. Paper presented to the Linguistics Society of America, 1985.
27. Foley, WA. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Foley WA, 1996 Papuan languages Notes from the Australian Linguistics Institute, Canberra.
29. Foley, WA. 1999. ‘Grammatical relations information structure and constituency in Watam’. Oceanic Linguistics, 38 (1): 115–138.
30. Foley, WA, and Van Valin, RD. 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
31. Gil, D. 1999. “ ‘Riau Indonesian as a Pivotless Language’ ”. In Tipologija i Teorija Jazyka, ot opisanija k objasneniju, k 60-letiju Aleksandra Evgen'evicha Kibrika (Typology and Linguistic Theory, from description to explanation, for the 60th birthday of Aleksandr E. Kibrik), Edited by: Rakhilina, EV, and Testelets, YG. 187–211. Moscow: Jazyki Russkoj Kul'tury.
32. Guilfoyle, E, Hung, H, and Travis, L. 1992. ‘Spec of IP and Spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 10: 374–414.
33. Haiman, J. 1987. ‘On some origins of medial verb morphology in Papuan languages’. Studies in Language, 11 (2): 347–364.
34. Haiman J, and Munro P, (eds) 1983 Switch reference and universal grammar John Benjamins Amsterdam.
35. Haspelmath, M. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
36. Holloway King, T. 1995. Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian, Stanford: CSLI Publications.
37. Horvath, J. 1986. Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian, Dordrecht: Foris.
38. Horvath, J. 1997. ‘The status of ‘wh-expletives’ and the partial wh-movement construction of Hungarian’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15: 509–572.
39. Iwamoto E, 1992 Visibility and argument identification: a conceptual semantic approach to Alamblak and Japanese. PhD thesis, Australian National University.
40. Jelinek, E, and Demers, RA. 1994. ‘Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish’. Language, 70 (4): 697–736.
41. Kiss, KÉ. 1994. “ ‘Sentence structure and word order’ ”. In Syntax and Semantics 27: The syntactic structure of Hungarian, Edited by: Kiefer, F, and Kiss, KÉ. 1–90. New York: Academic Press.
42. Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Li, CN, and Lang, R. 1979. “ ‘The syntactic irrelevance of an ergative case in Enga and other Papuan languages’ ”. In Ergativity: towards a theory of grammatical relations, Edited by: Plank, F. 307–345. London: Academic Press.
44. Macdonald L, 1990 A grammer of Tauya Mouton de Gruyter Bemin.
45. Manning C, 1994 Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
46. Marantz A, 1984 On the nature of Grammatical Relations. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 10 MIT Press Cambridge.
47. Margetts A, 1999 Valence and transitivity in Saliba, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen. MPI series in Psycholinguistics 12.
48. Massam, D. 2001. Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19: 153–197.
49. Mohanan, KP. 1982. “ ‘Grammatical relations in Malayalam’ ”. In The mental representation of grammatical relations, Edited by: Bresnan, J. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50. Mohanan, T. 1994. “ ‘Case OCP: a constraint on word order in Hindi’ ”. In Theoretical perspectives on word order in South Asian languages, Edited by: Butt, M, Holloway King, T, and Ramchand, G. 185–216. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
51. Mohanan, T. 1995. ‘Wordhood and lexicality: noun incorporation in Hindi’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13 (1): 75–134.
52. Mohanan, T. 1997. “ ‘Multidimensionality of representation: NV complex predicates in Hindi’ ”. In Complex predicates, Edited by: Alsina, A, Bresnan, J, and Sells, P. 431–471. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
53. Pawley AK, 1966 The structure of Kalam: a grammar of a New Guinea Highlands language. PhD thesis, University of Auckland
54. Pesetsky, D. 1987. “ ‘Wh-in-Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding’ ”. In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Edited by: Reuland, E, and ter Meulen, A. 98–129. Cambridge: MIT Press.
55. Priestley C, 2001 The morphosyntax of verbs in Koromu. MA Thesis, Department of Linguistics (faculties), Australian National University.
56. Purba T, & Budi R, 1995 Formations of Western Dani verbs. Paper presented at the International conference on New Guinea language and linguistics, Cenderawasih University. Jayapura, Irian Jaya.
57. Purba T, Paldi Y, Fakihuddin L, & Setiawati E, 1997 Sintaksis Bahasa Dani Barat Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Jakarta.
58. Reesink, G. 1983. ‘Switch reference and topicality hierarchies’ Studies in Language, 7 (2): 215–246.
59. Ross MD, 1980 Some elements of Vanimo, a New Guinea tone language. Papers in New Guinea linguistics No. 20 Pacific Linguistics A-56 Canberra 77–109.
60. Schachter, P. 1977. “ ‘Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects’ ”. In Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations, Edited by: Cole, P, and Sadock, JM. 279–305. New York: Academic Press.
61. Scott, G. 1973. Higher levels of Fore grammar, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics B-23.
62. Scott, G. 1978. The Fore language of Papua New Guinea, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics B-47.
63. Scott G, 1986 ‘ On ergativity in Fore and other Papuan languages ’ in DCLaycock et al. Papers in New Guinea Linguistics No. 24 Pacific Linguistics A-70 Canberra 167–175.
64. Suter E, nd (±1995) Syntax and analysis of the Kâte language, Morobe province, Papua New Guinea. PhD thesis in progress, Australian National University.
65. Van Valin, RD. 1981. ‘Grammatical relations in ergative languages’. Studies in Language, 5: 361–395.
66. Van Valin, RD, and LaPolla, RJ. 1997. Syntax: structure, meaning and function, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Vijayakrishnan, KG. 1994. “ ‘Compound typology in Tamil’ ”. In Theoretical perspectives on word order in South Asian languages, Edited by: Butt, M, Holloway King, T, and Ramchand, G. 263–278. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
68. Wade, M. 1997. ‘Switch reference and control in Apal’. Language and linguistics in Melanesia, 28 (1–2): 1–16.
69. Wunderlich, D, and Lakämper, R. 2001. ‘On the interaction of structural and semantic case’. Lingua, 111: 377–418.
70. Yokoyama, OT. 1986. Discourse and Word Order, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.