Increasing access to services for limited english proficient persons

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 27, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 15-25

  Gabrielle Lessard, J D ^a  

^a National Immigration Law Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055304927     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/PAD-120028650     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. US Census Bureau. American Fact Finder. Table GCT-P 11. Language, School Enrollment and Educational Attainment: 2000. retrieved February 15, 2003, from: http://factfinder.census.gov
2. U.S. Census Bureau. American Fact Finder. Table P.20. Household Language by Linguistic Isolation. retrieved February 15, 2003, from: http://factfinder.census.gov
3. Urban Institute. 2002. Immigrant Well-Being in New York and Los Angeles Vol. August, Washington, DC: Author.
4. Urban Institute. 2002. Immigrant Well-Being in New York and Los Angeles Washington, DC: Author. August
5. Holcomb, P.A., Tumlin, K., Koralek, R, Capps, R., and Zuberi, A., January 2003. The Application Process for TANF, Food Stamps, Medicaid and SCHIP January, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. retrieved May 29, 2003 http://wwv.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410640 pdf
6. 42 USC §200d, et seq. Policy Guidance. Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination As It Affects Persons With Limited English Proficiency. available on line at www.hhs.gov/ocr/lep/revisedlep.html
7. Department of Justice. Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons. 67 Fed. Reg. 41455 June 18, 2002, online at www.lep. gov/recip.html
8. Interagency Working Group on Limited English Proficiency www.LEP.gov
9. Pacific Asian Language Services for Health www.palsforhealth.org
10. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. March 2001. National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Standards in Health Care: Executive Summary March, Washington, DC: Author. Part I:xix
11. California Healthcare Interpreters Association. Executive Summary: California Standards for Healthcare Interpreters: Ethical Principles: Protocols, and Guidance on Roles and intervention. retrieved March 17, 2002, from www.chia.ws/standards
12. Asian Health Services www.ahschc. org
13. Institute for Health Advancement Nonprofit Book Grant Program. retrieved February 15, 2003; http://www.iha4health.org/books_nonprofit.html
14. US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Minority Health. National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Standards in Health Care: Executive Summary Washington, D.C.: Author. retrieved February 15, 2003, http://www.omhrc.gov/clas
15. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Retrieved February 15, 2003 www.jacho.org
16. Alexander, v. Sandoval. 121 S. Ct. 1511 (2001)
17. Cal. Government Code §7291
18. Chapter 89, San Francisco Administrative Code; Chapter 2.30, Oakland Municipal Code ”.
19. Interagency Working Group on Limited English Proficiency, retrieved February 15, 2003 http://www.lep.gov/community.html