From corporate governance to local governance: Stakeholder-driven community score-cards for uk local agencies?

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 26, Issue 8-9, 2003, Pages 1035-1058

  Bovaird, Tony ^a   Loeffler, Elke ^b   Martin, Jeremy ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b Governance International   (United Kingdom)

^c Lynx West Trading Estate   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citizen assessment; Community governance; Community score card; Comprehensive performance assessment; Local governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 85055301611     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/PAD-120019359     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Martin, J., Haines, J., Bovaird, T., and Wisniewski, M., 2002. “ Developing a balanced score-card in Somerset Health and Social Services Community ”. In Performance Measurement and Management: Research and Action Edited by: Neely, A., Cranfield, UK: Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield University.
2. Halachmi, A., and Bovaird, T., 1998. “ Community score-cards: the role of users, citizens, community organizations, the private sector and other stakeholders in performance assessment for Best Value ”. In Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice Edited by: Neely, A., and Waggoner, D., Cambridge, UK: Judge Institute of Management Studies.
3. Martin, S., Bovaird, T., Davis, H., Geddies, M., Hartley, J., Lewis, M., and Sanderson, I., 2001. Improving Local Public Services: Evaluation of the Best Value Pilot Program London: Report to Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions; Stationery Office.
4. Harrison, A., 1974. The Economics of Transport Appraisal London: Croom Helm.
5. Henkel, M., 1991. Government, Evaluation and Change London: Kingsley Press.
6. Bovaird, T., 1998. “ Setting objectives, performance indicators and priorities ”. In International Encyclopaedia of Public Policy and Administration Edited by: Shafritz, J. M., Boulder, USA: Westview Press.
7. Self, P., 1970. Nonsense on stilts: the futility of Roskill. New Soc
8. Lichfield, N., Kettle, P., and Whitbread, M., 1975. Evaluation in the Planning Process Oxford: Pergamon Press.
9. 2001. “ DTLR ”. In Strong Local Leadership—Quality Public Services London: Stationery Office.
10. 2001. “ Audit Commission ”. In Delivering Improvement Together: Audit Commission Strategy 2001–2004 London: Audit Commission.
11. 2002. “ Audit Commission ”. In Delivering Comprehensive Performance Assessment, Consultation Draft London: Audit Commission.
12. 2002. Audit Commission. CPA Newsletter, 1 (2): 1–4.
13. 2002. “ Audit Commission ”. In Comprehensive Performance Improvement: Self- Assessment—The Guidance London: Audit Commission.
14. Bovaird, T., 1998. International Approaches to Service and Financial Planning Birmingham: Report to the Audit Commission; PSMRC.
15. Younger, M., and Lawson, T., 1998. Empowering Residents as Community Consumers Louisville, Kentucky: University of Louisville.
16. 1997. “ Human Development Council ”. In Community Report Card 1997: Assessing the Quality of Life for Children and Families Kentucky: Human Development Council.
17. Kaplan, R., and Norton, D., 1996. The Balanced Score-card: Translating Strategy Into Action Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Young, N., Gardner, S., Coley, S., Schorr, L., and Bruner, C., 1994. Making a Difference: Moving to Outcome-Based Accountability for Comprehensive Service Reforms, Resource Brief 7 Des Moines, Iowa: National Center For Service Integration.
19. Vigoda, E., and Yuval, F., 2001. The Performance of the Israeli Public Sector: A Citizens Survey and National Assessment Haifa, Israel: Centre of Organizations and Human Resource Management and Department of Political Science, University of Haifa.
20. Bovaird, T., and Loeffler, E., 2002. “ From excellence models of local service delivery to a comprehensive concept of ‘World Class Local Authorities.’ ”. In Evaluation and Accounting Standards in Public Management Edited by: Eichhorn, P., and Bräunig, D., Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlaggesellschaft.
21. Vigoda, E., 2002. Administrative agents of democracy? A structural equation modeling (SEM) of the relationship between public sector performance and citizenship involvement. J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor., 12 (2): 241–273.
22. 2002. “ Performance and Improvement Unit ”. In Social Capital: A Discussion Paper London: Cabinet Office.
23. Loeffler, E., 2002. Local Governance Health Checks Birmingham: Governance International.
24. Box, R., Marshall, G., Reed, B. J., and Reed, C., 2001. New public management and substantive democracy. Public Admin. Rev., 61 (5): 608–619.
25. 2001. “ OECD ”. In Knowledge Management Challenges for the Public Sector: Executive Summary Paris: OECD. (www1.oecd.org/puma/pubs/KM.pdf)
26. 2002. Social Analysis Sourcebook Washington: World Bank. World Bank (www.worldbank.org/socialanalysissourcebook)
27. Manning, N., 2002. Second Generation Governance Indicators Washington: World Bank. Unpublished Paper