Social Constructions, Anticipatory Feedback Strategies, and Deceptive Public Policy

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 206-236

  Schneider, Anne L ^a   Ingram, Helen M ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

mass publics; policy feedback; quantitative review

Indexed keywords

POLICY ANALYSIS; POLICY APPROACH; POWER RELATIONS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; SOCIAL POLICY;

EID: 85055175862     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: 15410072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/psj.12281     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Arizona Center for Economic Progress. 2017. “Q&A: Arizona’s State Budget and Taxes, What Every Arizonan Needs to Know about Growing Our Economy." https://azchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/QA-Budget-and-Taxes-002.pdf/. Accessed August 31, 2018.
2. Arizona Department of Revenue. 2016. Annual Report. Phoenix: Author.
3. Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2011. “Policy Feedbacks and the Impact of Policy Designs on Public Opinion.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 36 (6): 961–73.
5. Dryzek, John. 1990. Discursive Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
7. Fording, Richard, and Dana Patton. 2018. “Policy Feedback and the Affordable Care Act: The Political Effects of State Cooperation in the Implementation of Obamacare.” Policy Studies Journal.
8. Gaventa, John. 1980. Power and Powerlessness. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9. Haight, Johnathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind. New York: Random House.
10. Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
11. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. 1982. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kreitzer, Rebecca, and Candice Smith. 2018. “Reproducible and Replicable: An Empirical Assessment of the Social Construction of Politically Relevant Target Groups.” PS: Political Science and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518000987
13. Luke, Timothy W. 1989. Screens of Power: Ideology, Domination and Resistance in an Information Society. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
14. Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Pierson, Paul. 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.
16. Rozin, Paul, and Edward B. Royzman. 2001. “Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 5 (4): 296–320.
17. Schattschneider, E. F. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist View of Democracy in America. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
18. Schneider, Anne L., and Helen Ingram. 1993. “The Social Construction of Target Populations: Implication for Politics and Policy.” The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–47.
19. Schneider, Anne L., and Helen Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
20. Stone, Deborah. 1988. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
21. Weaver, Kent. 2010. “Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders? Negative Feedbacks and Policy Regime Change.” Journal of Public Policy 30 (2): 137–62.