Improve hip fracture outcome in the elderly patient (iHOPE): A study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of spinal versus general anaesthesia

BMJ Open

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2018, Pages

  Kowark, Ana ^a   Adam, Christian ^b   Ahrens, Jörg ^c   Bajbouj, Malek ^d   Bollheimer, Cornelius ^a   Borowski, Matthias ^e   Dodel, Richard ^f   Dolch, Michael ^g   Hachenberg, Thomas ^h   Henzler, Dietrich ⁱ   Hildebrand, Frank ^a   Hilgers, Ralf Dieter ^a   Hoeft, Andreas ^j   Isfort, Susanne ^a   Kienbaum, Peter ^k   Knobe, Mathias ^a   Knuefermann, Pascal ^l   Kranke, Peter ^m   Laufenberg Feldmann, Rita ⁿ   Nau, Carla ^o   Neuman, Mark D ^p   Olotu, Cynthia ^q   Rex, Christopher ^r   Rossaint, Rolf ^a   Sanders, Robert D ^s   Schmidt, Rene ^a   Schneider, Frank ^a,t   Siebert, Hartmut ^u   Skorning, Max ^v   Spies, Claudia ^d   Vicent, Oliver ^w   Wappler, Frank ^x   Wirtz, Dieter Christian ^j   Wittmann, Maria ^j   Zacharowski, Kai ^y   Zarbock, Alexander ^z   Coburn, Mark ^a   more..

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Klinikverbund St Antonius und St Josef GmbH   (Germany)

^c HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MAGDEBURG   (Germany)

ⁱ RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^k UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^l Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

ⁿ JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^o UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^p UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^r District Hospital Reutlingen   (Germany)

^s UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^t FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^u Geschäftsführerin Aktionsbündnis Patientensicherheit e V   (Germany)

^v Medical Advisory Service of Social Health Insurance   (Germany)

^w UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^x UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

^y UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^z UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

anaesthesia in orthopaedics; anaesthetics; geriatric medicine

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALL CAUSE MORTALITY; ANAPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL HEMATOMA; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART ARREST; HIP FRACTURE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT HYPERTHERMIA; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PARALYSIS; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; WALKING; FEMALE; HIP REPLACEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOLS AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRAGMATIC CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85055071253     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023609     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anteile der Altersgruppen unter 20, ab 65 und ab 80 Jahre in Deutschland, 1871 bis 2060 (Stand: 2015. http://www. bibdemografie. de/ DE/ ZahlenundFakten/ 02/ Abbildungen/ a_ 02_ 12_ ag_ 20_ 65_ 80_ d_ 1871_ 2060. html? nn= 3074114 (accessed March 2018).
2. Medin E, Goude F, Melberg HO, et al. European regional differences in all-cause mortality and length of stay for patients with hip fracture. Health Econ 2015;24(Suppl 2):53-64.
3. Royal College of Physicians and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, 2017. National Hip Fracture Database. NHFD-AnnualReport https:// nhfd. co. uk/ files/ 2017ReportFiles/ NHFDAnnualReport2017. pdf (accessed Jun 2018).
4. Holt G, Smith R, Duncan K, et al. Changes in population demographics and the future incidence of hip fracture. Injury 2009;40:722-6.
5. Coburn M, Rohl AB, Knobe M, et al. [Anesthesiological management of elderly trauma patients]. Anaesthesist 2016;65:98-106.
6. European State Population Numbers. http//www. europe. eu (accessed Sep 2017).
7. Huftgelenknahe Femurfraktur mit osteosynthetischer Versorgung. Huftgelenknahe Femurfraktur mit osteosynthetischer Versorgung. https://www. iqtig. org/ downloads/ ergebnisse/ qidb/ 2016/ 2017- 04- 26/ QIDB_ 2016_ INDIREKT_ PDF/ QIDB_ 2016_ indirekte_ Verfahren/ QIDB_ Referenzbereiche/ QSKH_ 17n1- HUEFT- FRAK_ 2016_ QIDB- DV_ V01_ 2017- 04- 06. pdf (accessed Mar 2018).
8. Carow J, Carow JB, Coburn M, et al. Mortality and cardiorespiratory complications in trochanteric femoral fractures: A ten year retrospective analysis. Int Orthop 2017;41:2371-80.
9. Boddaert J, Raux M, Khiami F, et al. Perioperative management of elderly patients with hip fracture. Anesthesiology 2014;121:1336-41.
10. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, et al. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 2009;302:1573-9.
11. Coburn M, Sanders R, Neuman M, et al. We may have improved but we must get better still: The never-ending story of the elderly with fractured neck of femur. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2017;34:115-7.
12. Johansen A, Tsang C, Boulton C, et al. Understanding mortality rates after hip fracture repair using ASA physical status in the National Hip Fracture Database. Anaesthesia 2017;72:961-6.
13. Tsang C, Boulton C, Burgon V, et al. Predicting 30-day mortality after hip fracture surgery: Evaluation of the National Hip Fracture Database case-mix adjustment model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:550-6.
14. Coburn M, Fahlenkamp A, Zoremba N, et al. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: Incidence and prophylaxis. Anaesthesist 2010;59:177-84.
15. Huang YF, Liang J, Shyu YL. Number of comorbidities negatively influence psychological outcomes of the elderly following hip fracture in Taiwan. J Aging Health 2016;28:1343-61.
16. White SM, Altermatt F, Barry J, et al. International fragility fracture network delphi consensus statement on the principles of anaesthesia for patients with hip fracture. Anaesthesia 2018;73:863-74.
17. White SM, Moppett IK, Griffiths R. Outcome by mode of anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. An observational audit of 65 535 patients in a national dataset. Anaesthesia 2014;69:224-30.
18. Guay J, Parker MJ, Gajendragadkar PR, et al. Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD000521.
19. White SM, Moppett IK, Griffiths R, et al. Secondary analysis of outcomes after 11, 085 hip fracture operations from the prospective UK Anaesthesia Sprint Audit of Practice (ASAP-2). Anaesthesia 2016;71:506-14.
20. Neuman MD, Rosenbaum PR, Ludwig JM, et al. Anesthesia technique, mortality, and length of stay after hip fracture surgery. JAMA 2014;311:2508-17.
21. Patorno E, Neuman MD, Schneeweiss S, et al. Comparative safety of anesthetic type for hip fracture surgery in adults: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2014;348:g4022.
22. Van Waesberghe J, Stevanovic A, Rossaint R, et al. General vs. neuraxial anaesthesia in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2017;17:87.
23. O'Donnell CM, McLoughlin L, Patterson CC, et al. Perioperative outcomes in the context of mode of anaesthesia for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: Systematic review and metaanalysis. Br J Anaesth 2018;120:37-50.
24. Neuman MD, Ellenberg SS, Sieber FE, et al. Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture (REGAIN): Protocol for a pragmatic, international multicentre trial. BMJ Open 2016;6:e013473.
25. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, et al. The PRECIS-2 tool: Designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ 2015;350:h2147.
26. ACS NSQIP. https://www. facs. org/ quality- programs/ acs- nsqip (accessed Feb 2018).
27. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2551-67.
28. Coburn M, Sanders RD, Maze M, et al. The hip fracture surgery in elderly patients (HIPELD) study to evaluate xenon anaesthesia for the prevention of postoperative delirium: A multicentre, randomized clinical trial. Br J Anaesth 2018;120:127-37.
29. Marcantonio ER, Ngo LH, O'Connor M, et al. 3D-CAM: Derivation and validation of a 3-minute diagnostic interview for CAM-defined delirium: A cross-sectional diagnostic test study. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:554-61.
30. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129-38.
31. Nagel B, Gerbershagen HU, Lindena G, et al. [Development and evaluation of the multidimensional German pain questionnaire]. Schmerz 2002;16:263-70.
32. Bauer M, Bohrer H, Aichele G, et al. Measuring patient satisfaction with anaesthesia: Perioperative questionnaire versus standardised face-to-face interview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:65-72.
33. Kawas C, Karagiozis H, Resau L, et al. Reliability of the blessed telephone information-memory-concentration test. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1995;8:238-42.
34. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:815-23.
35. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982;17:37-49.
36. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M146-M157.
37. Hilgers RD, Uschner D, Rosenberger WF, et al. ERDO - a framework to select an appropriate randomization procedure for clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017;17:159.
38. Waurick K. RHVAHKPGWVT. Anästh Intensivmed 2014;55:464-92.
39. OpenClinca. http:// openclinica. com (accessed Feb 2018).
40. CDISC. http://www. cdisc. org (accessed Feb 2018).
41. Branson M, Whitehead J. Estimating a treatment effect in survival studies in which patients switch treatment. Stat Med 2002;21:2449-63.
42. White SM, Griffiths R, Moppett IK. Standardising anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Anaesthesia 2016;71:1391-5.
43. Moppett IK, White SM, Griffiths R. Standards for hip fracture anaesthesia - a reply. Anaesthesia 2017;72:407-8.
44. DGAI Entschliesungen. Empfehlungen, Vereinbarungen. https://www. dgai. de/ publikationen/ vereinbarungen. html# i__ vereinbarungen_ mit_ anderen_ fachgebieten (accessed Jul 2018).
45. Beck G. Mindestanforderungen an den anasthesiologischen Arbeitsplatz*. Anaesth Intensivmed 2013;54:39-42.
46. Querschnitts-Leitlinien (BÄK). zur Therapie mit Blutkomponenten und Plasmaderivaten. https://www. bundesaerztekammer. de/ fileadmin/ user_ upload/ downloads/ QLL_ Haemotherapie_ 2014. pdf (accessed Jul 2018).
47. Leitlinien der DGU. http://www. dgu- online. de/ qualitaet- sicherheit/ leitlinien/ leitlinien- der- dgu. html (accessed Jul 2018).
48. Sieber FE, Zakriya KJ, Gottschalk A, et al. Sedation depth during spinal anesthesia and the development of postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture repair. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:18-26.
49. Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: Study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1990;10:244-51.
50. IPD MA chochrane. http://www. methods. cochrane. org/ ipdma (accessed Feb 2018).
51. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, et al. 2014 ACC/ AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;130:2215-45.