Induction log anisotropy corrections

SPWLA 32nd Annual Logging Symposium 1991

Volumn , Issue , 1991, Pages

  Klein, James D ^a  

^a Arco Oil and Gas Co   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; DEFLECTED BOREHOLES; INDUCTION LOGGING; OIL FIELDS; OIL WELLS; SHALE;

DEVIATED WELLS; ELECTRICAL ANISOTROPY; GEOLOGIC STRUCTURES; HIGHLY DEVIATED WELLS; LOG INTERPRETATION; LONGITUDINAL RESISTIVITY; MODEL PARAMETERS; ROCK RESISTIVITY;

OIL WELL LOGGING;

EID: 85055009752     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Anderson, B., Safinya, K.A., and Habashy, T., 1988, Effect of dipping beds on the response of induction tools: SPE Formation Evaluation, March, p. 29.
2. Carmen, G. J., and Hardwick, P. 1983, Geology and regional setting of Kuparuk Oil Field, Alaska: Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bul., v. 67, p. 1014-1031.
3. Chemali, R., Gianzero, S., and Su, S.M., 1987, The effect of shale anisotropy on focused resistivity devices: Trans. SPWLA 28th Annual Logging Symposium, London, June 29-July 2, paper H, 23 p.
4. Keller G. V., and Frischknecht, F. C., 1966, Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting: Pergamon Press, New York, 517 p.
5. Moran, J.H., and Gianzero, S., 1979, Effects of formation anisotropy on resistivity logging measurements: Geophysics, v. 44, p. 1266-1286.
6. Maillet, R., 1947, The fundamental equations of electrical prospecting: Geophysics, v. 12, p. 529-556.