Several field data examples of Dealiasing DMO

1996 SEG Annual Meeting

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 1168-1171

  Bale, Richard ^a   Ferber, Ralf ^a   Nichols, Dave ^a   Stolte, Christian ^a   Ronen, Shuki ^a  

^a Geco Prakla   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRAPOLATION; GEOMETRY; SURVEYS;

ACQUISITION FOOTPRINT; ACQUISITION GEOMETRY; CONSTRAINED INVERSIONS; CONVENTIONAL PROCESSING; IRREGULAR GEOMETRIES; PARALLEL COMPUTER; PRE-STACK MIGRATION; PROCESSING METHOD;

PROCESSING;

EID: 85055001272     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/1.1826302     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Beasley, C., and Klotz, R., 1992. Equalization of DMO for irregular spatial sampling. SEG annual meeting.
2. Brink. M., and Larsen. B.. 1996. Effects of seismic acquisition geometry on seismic processing: analysis of the DMO techniques. NPF annual meeting, Krisdansand.
3. Liner, C., and Ronen, S., 1987. Theory of spatial antialias-ing of log-stretched multichannel reflection data: SEG annual meeting.
4. Goodway, WN., and Ragan, B., 1995. Focused 3D: consequences of mid-point scatter and spatial sampling in acquisition design, processing and interpretation. CSEG.
5. Paige, C. C., and Saunders, M. A.. 1982. LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse last squares. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 8,195-209.
6. Ronen, S., Sorin, V., and Bale, R.. 1991. Spatial dealiasing of 3-D seismic reflection data. Geophysical Journal International 105,503.511.
7. Ronen, S., Ferber, R.. Bale, R., and Nichols, D., 1995. De&sing DMO: the good. the bad, and the unconstrained. SEG annual meeting.
8. Vermeer, G.J.O., 1996. DMO in cross-spread: the failure of existing software to handle amplitudes correctly. EAGE annual meeting.