High-Pressure Chemical Looping Reforming Processes: System Analysis for Syngas Generation from Natural Gas and Reducing Tail Gases

Energy and Fuels

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2018, Pages 10408-10420

  Sandvik, Peter ^a   Kathe, Mandar ^a   Wang, William ^a   Kong, Fanhe ^a   Fan, Liang Shih ^a  

^a Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); METALS; METHANE; PETROCHEMICALS; SYNTHESIS GAS;

CHEMICAL-LOOPING REFORMING; EQUILIBRIUM CONDITIONS; EQUILIBRIUM SIMULATIONS; PARTIAL OXIDATION REACTIONS; PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PRESSURIZED CONDITIONS; PROCESS APPLICATIONS; TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURES;

REFORMING REACTIONS;

EID: 85054540924     PISSN: 08870624     EISSN: 15205029     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01834     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Short Term Energy Outlook; EIA, DOE: Washington, D.C., May 2018.
2. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2018; EIA, DOE: Washington, D.C., March 2018.
3. Noelker, K.; Johanning, J. Autothermal reforming: A flexible syngas route with future potential. Proceedings of the Nitrogen and Syngas International Conference; Bahrain, Feb 28-March 3, 2010.
4. Lyubovsky, M.; Roychoudhury, S.; LaPierre, R. Catalytic partial oxidation of methane to syngas at elevated pressures. Catal. Lett. 2005, 99 (3-4), 113-117, 10.1007/s10562-005-2103-y
5. Rostrup-Nielsen, J. R. Production of synthesis gas. Catal. Today 1993, 18 (4), 305-324, 10.1016/0920-5861(93)80059-A
6. National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Syngas Optimized for Intended Products; NETL, DOE: Pittsburgh, PA, 2016.
7. Wilhelm, D. J.; Simbeck, D. R.; Karp, A. D.; Dickenson, R. L. Syngas production for gas-to-liquids applications: Technologies, issues and outlook. Fuel Process. Technol. 2001, 71 (1-3), 139-148, 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00140-0
8. 2 as a partial substitute for methane feedstock in chemical looping methane-steam redox processes for syngas production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10 (6), 1345-1349, 10.1039/C6EE03701A
9. 2 as feedstock. AIChE J. 2017, 63 (8), 3343-3360, 10.1002/aic.15692
10. Fan, L.-S. Chemical Looping Partial Oxidation: Gasification, Reforming, and Chemical Syntheses; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2017.
11. Adanez, J.; Abad, A.; Garcia-Labiano, F.; Gayan, P.; de Diego, L. F. Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2012, 38 (2), 215-282, 10.1016/j.pecs.2011.09.001
12. 2) Capture; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, U.K., 2015; pp 3-14.
13. Fan, L.-S.; Li, F. Chemical looping technology and its fossil energy conversion applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49 (21), 10200-10211, 10.1021/ie1005542
14. Fan, L.-S. Chemical Looping Systems for Fossil Energy Conversions; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2011.
15. Wood, D.; Nwaoha, C.; Towler, B. Gas-to-liquids (GTL): A review of an industry offering several routes for monetizing natural gas. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2012, 9, 196-208, 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.07.001
16. de Klerk, A. Gas-to-liquids conversion. Proceedings of the Natural Gas Conversion Technologies Workshop of ARPA-E; Houston TX, Jan 13, 2012.
17. Malik, A., Mantri, V. Gas-to-Liquids Plants Face Challenges in the U.S. Market; U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Washington, D.C., 2014.
18. Goellner, J. F.; Kuehn, N. J.; Shah, V.; White, C. W., III; Woods, M. C. Baseline Analysis of Crude Methanol Production from Coal and Natural Gas; National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Pittsburgh, PA, 2014; DOE/NETL-341/101514.
19. Chmielniak, T.; Sciazko, M. Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis. Appl. Energy 2003, 74 (3-4), 393-403, 10.1016/S0306-2619(02)00184-8
20. Yoon, H.; Erickson, P. Hydrogen from coal-derived methanol via autothermal reforming processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33 (1), 57-63, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.08.031
21. 2 as a co-feedstock for chemical syntheses. Energy Fuels 2018, 32 (2), 1139-1154, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02742
22. Cheng, W. H. Methanol Production and Use; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1994.
23. Lin, H.; Jin, H.; Gao, L.; Han, W. Economic analysis of coal-based polygeneration system for methanol and power production. Energy 2010, 35 (2), 858-863, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.08.007
24. Biljetina, R.; Tarman, P. Development status of the steam-iron process for hydrogen production. Altern. Energy Sources, [Proc. Miami Int. Conf.], 2nd 1981, 8, 3335-3347
25. Institute of Gas Technology (IGT). Development of the Steam-Iron Process for Hydrogen Production; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Washington, D.C., 1979; EF-77-C-01-2435.
26. 2 Acceptor Process Gasification Pilot Plant; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Washington, D.C., 1978; AC01-76ET10253.
27. 2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion-prospect and opportunity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 (6), 7254-7280, 10.1039/c2ee03198a
28. 2 capture. Appl. Energy 2018, 230, 1660-1672, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.104
29. Deshpande, N.; Majumder, A.; Qin, L.; Fan, L.-S. High-pressure redox behavior of iron-oxide-based oxygen carriers for syngas generation from methane. Energy Fuels 2015, 29 (3), 1469-1478, 10.1021/ef5025998
30. 2:CO ratio of 2:1. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7 (12), 4104-4117, 10.1039/C4EE02892A
31. García-Labiano, F.; Adanez, J.; deDiego, L. F.; Gayan, P.; Abad, A. Effect of pressure on the behavior of copper-, iron-, and nickel-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion. Energy Fuels 2006, 20 (1), 26-33, 10.1021/ef050238e
32. Deshpande, N. Calcium and Iron Oxide Reactivity Studies for Chemical Looping Applications of Clean Energy Conversion. Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2015.
33. Zhang, Z.; Yao, J. G.; Boot-Handford, M. E.; Fennell, P. Pressurised chemical-looping combustion of an iron-based oxygen carrier: Reduction kinetic measurements and modelling. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 171, 205-214, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.018
34. Goellner, J.; Shah, V.; Turner, M. J.; Kuehn, N. J.; Littlefield, J.; Cooney, G.; Marriott, J. Analysis of Natural Gas-to-Liquid Transportation Fuels via Fischer-Tropsch; National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Pittsburgh, PA, 2013; DOE/NETL-2013/1597.
35. Luo, S.; Zeng, L.; Fan, L.-S. Chemical looping technology: Oxygen carrier characteristics. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2015, 6 (6), 53-75, 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060713-040334
36. 2 Capture; U.S. Department of Energy (DOE): Washington, D.C., 2015; FE0012136, DOI: 10.2172/1185194.
37. th sub-pilot unit with 100% carbon capture. Fuel 2013, 103 (103), 495-505, 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.088
38. th subpilot unit. Energy Fuels 2012, 26 (4), 2292-2302, 10.1021/ef202039y