Social-EQ: Crowdsourcing an equalization descriptor map

Proceedings of the 14th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 395-400

  Cartwright, Mark ^a   Pardo, Bryan ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO ACOUSTICS; CROWDSOURCING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

DESCRIPTORS; LEARNING SESSIONS; WEB BASED PROJECTS;

EQUALIZERS;

EID: 85054226848     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. I. Borg and P. Groenen. Modern multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications. Springer Verlag, 2005.
2. A. Disley and D. Howard. Spectral correlates of timbral semantics relating to the pipe organ. Speech, Music and Hearing, 46:25–39, 2004.
3. B. Glasberg and B. Moore. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research, 47(12):103–138, 1990.
4. J. Grey. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. The Journal of the ASA, 61(5):1270–1277, 1977.
5. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. The elements of statistical learning. Springer New York, 2001.
6. H. Helmholtz and A. Ellis. On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music. Dover, New York, 2d english edition, 1954.
7. J. Hershey and P. Olsen. Approximating the kullback leibler divergence between gaussian mixture models. In Proc. ICASSP, 2007.
8. D. Huber and R. Runstein. Modern recording techniques. Focal Press/Elsevier, Amsterdam; Boston, 7th edition, 2010.
9. E. Lukasik. Towards timbre-driven semantic retrieval of violins. In Proc. of International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, 2005.
10. C. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schtze. Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, 2008.
11. S. McAdams, S. Winsberg, S. Donnadieu, G. Soete, and J. Krimphoff. Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychological Research, 58(3):177–192, 1995.
12. S. Mecklenburg and J. Loviscach. subjeqt: controlling an equalizer through subjective terms. In Proc. of CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2006.
13. G. Miller. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM, 38(11):39–41, 1995.
14. D. Reed. Capturing perceptual expertise: a sound equalization expert system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(12):111–118, 2001.
15. A.T. Sabin, Z. Rafii, and B. Pardo. Weighting-function-based rapid mapping of descriptors to audio processing parameters. Journal of the AES, 59(6):419–430, 2011.
16. M. Sarkar, B. Vercoe, and Y. Yang. Words that describe timbre: a study of auditory perception through language. In Proc. of Language and Music as Cognitive Systems Conference, 2007.
17. J. Scott, R. Migneco, B. Morton, C. Hahn, P. Diefenbach, and Y. Kim. An audio processing library for mir application development in flash. In Proc. ISMIR, 2010.
18. R. Shepard. Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89(4):305–333, 1982.
19. D. Smalley. Spectromorphology: explaining sound-shapes. Organised Sound, 2(02):107–126, 1997.
20. L. Solomon. Search for physical correlates to psychological dimensions of sounds. The Journal of the ASA, 31(4):492–497, 1959.
21. E. Toulson. A need for universal definitions of audio terminologies and improved knowledge transfer to the audio consumer. In Proc. of The Art of Record Production Conference, 2003.
22. A. Zacharakis, K. Pastiadis, G. Papadelis, and J. Reiss. An investigation of musical timbre: Uncovering salient semantic descriptions and perceptual dimensions. In Proc. of the ISMIR, 2011.