Conceptualizing disability to inform rehabilitation: Historical and epistemological perspectives

Rethinking Rehabilitation: Theory and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 21-44

  Leplège, Alain ^a   Barral, Catherine ^b   McPherson, Kathryn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b Sorbonne Paris Cite   (France)

^c AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85054204749     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b18118     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society 2(1):5-19.
2. Albrecht, G. (1976). The Sociology of Physical Disability and Rehabilitation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
3. Barbotte, E., Guillemin, F., and Chau, N. (2001). Prevalence of impairments, disabilities, handicaps, and quality of life in general population: A review of recent literature. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 79(11):1047-55.
4. Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: A Case for Anti-Discrimination Legislation. London: Hurst and Co.
5. Barral, C. (2007). Disabled Persons’ Associations in France. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 9(3-4):214-36.
6. Barral, C., and Roussel, P. (2002). De la CIH à la CIF. Le processus de révision. Handicap-Revue de Sciences Humaines et Sociales 94-95:1-24.
7. Barton, L. (1993). The struggle for citizenship: The case of disabled people. Disability, Handicap and Society 8(3):235-48.
8. Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe.
9. Bickenbach, J.E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E.M., and Üstün, T.B. (1999). Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Social Science and Medicine 48:1173-87.
10. Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Sciences 44:542-73.
11. Braddock, D.L., and Parish, S.L. (2001). An institutional history of disability. In G.L. Albrecht, K.D. Seelman, and M. Bury (eds.) Handbook of Disability Studies, 11-68. London: Sage Publications.
12. Bruyère, S.M., Van Looy, S.A., and Peterson, D.B. (2005). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): Contemporary literature review. Rehabilitation Psychology 50:113-21.
13. Buntinx, W., and Schalock, R.L. (2010). Models of disability, quality of life, and individualized supports: Implications for professional practice in intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 7(4):283-94.
14. Castel, R. (1989). Le social aux prises avec l’histoire. Les Cahiers de la Recherche sur le Travail Social n°16/89:9-27.
15. Castel, R. (1999). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale: Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Gallimard.
16. Castel, R. (2003). From Manual Workers to Wage Labourers: Transformation of the Social Question. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
17. Cieza, A., Bickenbach, J., and Chatterji, S. (2008). The ICF as a conceptual platform to specify and discuss health and health related concepts. Gesundheitswesen 70:1-10.
18. Cieza, A., Ewert, T., Ustun, T.B., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., and Stucki, G. (2004). Development of ICF core sets for patients with chronic conditions. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 44(Suppl):9-11.
19. DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: From social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 60:435-46.
20. Dowrick, C., May, C., Richardson, M., and Bundred, P. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of general practice: Rhetoric or reality? British Journal of General Practice 46(403):105-7.
21. Engel, G.L. (1977). The need for a new medical model. Science 196:129-36.
22. Engel, G.L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. The American Journal of Psychiatry 137(5):535-44.
23. Ewald, F. (1986). L’Etat Providence. Paris: Grasset.
24. Fagot-Largeault, A. (1989). Les causes de la mort, Histoire naturelle et facteurs de risque. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
25. Fossier, A. (2002). Le grand renfermement. Tracés. Revue de Sciences humaines, 1/2002. Retrieved from http://traces.revues.org/4130 (accessed April 10, 2014).
26. Foucault, M. (1973). Madness and Civilization. A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
27. Fougeyrollas, P. (1993). Explanatory models of the consequences of disease and trauma: The handicap creation process. ICIDH, International Network 6(2).
28. Fougeyrollas, P. (1995). Documenting environmental factors for preventing the handicap creation process: Quebec contribution relating to I.C.I.D.H. and social participation of people with functional differences. Disability and Rehabilitation 17(3-4):145-53.
29. Fougeyrollas, P. (2002). L’évolution conceptuelle internationale dans le champ du handicap: Enjeux socio-politiques et contributions québécoises. Pistes 4:2.
30. Fougeyrollas, P. (2010). La funambule, le fil et la toile: Transformations réciproques du handicap. Laval: Presses de l’Université.
31. Fougeyrollas, P., Cloutier, R., Bergeron, H., Côté, J., Côté, M., and St-Michel, G. (1996). Révision de la proposition québécoise de classification: Processus de production du handicap. Québec: Réseau international sur le processus de production du handicap.
32. Fougeyrollas, P., and International Network on the Disability Creation Process (INDCP). (2010). Human Development Model-Disability Creation Process. Québec, Canada: INDCP. Retrieved from http://www.indcp.qc.ca/hdm-dcp/hdm-dcp.
33. Frattini, M.-O. (2008). Dynamique de constitution d’une spécialité médicale fragile: La médecine de rééducation et réadaptation fonctionnelles en France entre médecine et politique. (Unpublished Masters Dissertation ‘Santé, Population, Politiques sociales’). Paris: EHESS. Retrieved from http://www.sofmer.com/download/sofmer/MOF -M2-SPPS-EHESS.pdf.
34. Geremek, B. (1987). La potence ou la pitié. L’Europe et les pauvres du Moyen-Age à nos jours. Paris: Gallimard.
35. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York: Anchor Books.
36. Gzil, F., Lefève, C., Cammelli, M., Pachoud, B., Ravaud, J.F., and Leplège, A. (2007). Why is rehabilitation not yet fully person-centered and should it be more person-centered? Disability and Rehabilitation 29:20-21.
37. Hahn, H. (1985). Toward a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines, and policies. Social Science Journal 22:87-105.
38. Hahn, H. (1988). The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination. Journal of Social Issues 44:39-47.
39. Hahn, H. (1993). The political implications of disability definitions and data. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 4:41-52.
40. Institute of Medicine. (1991). Disability in America. Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. Institute of Medicine. (1997). Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. Lang, R. (2009). The United Nations Convention on the right and dignities for persons with disability: A panacea for ending disability discrimination? Alter-European Journal of Disability Research 3(3):266-86.
43. Leplège, A., and Hunt, S. (1997). The problem of quality of life in medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 278(1):47-50.
44. Levasseur, M., Desrosiers, J., and St-Cyr, T.D. (2007). Comparing the disability creation process and international classification of functioning, disability and health models. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 74(3 Suppl):233-42.
45. Masala, C., and Petretto, D.R. (2010). Models of disability. In J.H. Stone, and M. Blouin (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation. State University of New York College of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York: Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE). Retrieved from http://cirrie.buffalo .edu/encyclopedia/en/article/135/ (accessed October 24, 2014).
46. McLaren, N. (2002). The myth of the biopsychosocial model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36(5):701-3.
47. Montès, J.-F. (2002). L’office national des anciens combattants et victimes de guerre. Création et actions durant l’entre-deux-guerres. Guerres mondiales et conflits contemporains 2002/1, n°205:71-83.
48. Nagi, S.Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In M.B. Sussman (ed.) Sociology and Rehabilitation, 100-13. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
49. Nagi, S.Z. (1976). An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 54:439-67.
50. Nagi, S.Z. (1991). Disability concepts revised: Implications for prevention. In A.M. Pope, and A.R. Tarlov (eds.) Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. (1993). Research Plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
52. Oliver, M. (1983). The politics of disability. Paper given at The Annual General Meeting of The Disability Alliance. Retrieved from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk /files /library/Oliver-dis-alliance.pdf (accessed October 24, 2014).
53. Oliver, M. (1986). Social policy and disability: Some theoretical issues. Disability, Handicap and Society 1(1):5-17.
54. Patston, P. (2007). Constructive functional diversity: A new paradigm beyond disability and impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation 29(20-21):1625-33.
55. Peter, J.-P. (1976). Le grand rêve de l’ordre médical en 1770 et aujourd’hui. Autrement n°4, Gouverner la misère, 183-92.
56. Pfeiffer, D. (2002). The philosophical foundations of disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly 22(2):3-23.
57. Piven, F., and Cloward, R.A. (1971). Regulating the Poor. The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage.
58. Ravaud, J.F. (1999). Modèle individuel, modèle médical, modèle social: La question du sujet. Handicap-Revue de Sciences Humaines et Sociales 81:64-75.
59. Ravenek, M.J., Skarakis-Doyle, E., Spaulding, S.J., Jenkins, M.E., and Doyle, P.C. (2013). Enhancing the conceptual clarity and utility of the international classification of functioning, disability and health: The potential of a new graphic representation. Disability and Rehabilitation 35(12):1015-25.
60. Rosen, G. (1993). A History of Public Health. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
61. Rossignol, C. (2000). ICIDH2. Projet Béta2: Analyse textuelle et formelle. Rapport d’expertise. Laboratoire Langage et parole. CNRS.
62. Roussel, P. (1999). CIH-1/CIH-2: Rénovation complète ou ravalement de façade? Handicap-Revue de Sciences Humaines et Sociales 81:7-19.
63. Snyder, A.R., Parsons, J.T., Tamara, C., McLeod, V., Curtis Bay, R., Michener, L.A., and Sauers, E.L. (2008). Using disablement models and clinical outcomes assessment to enable evidence-based athletic training practice, part i: Disablement models. Journal of Athletic Training 43(4):428-36.
64. Solli, H.M., and Barbosa da Silva, A. (2012). The holistic claims of the biopsychosocial conception of WHO’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): A conceptual analysis on the basis of a pluralistic-holistic ontology and multidimensional view of the human being. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37(3):277-94.
65. Stiker, H.J. (1997). Corps infirmes et sociétés, 2nd ed. Paris: Dunod.
66. Stiker, H.J. (1999). A History of Disability (W. Sayers, Trans.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
67. Stone, D.A. (1986). The Disabled State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
68. Thomas, C. (2012). Theorising disability and chronic illness: Where next for perspectives in medical sociology? Social Theory and Health 10(3):209-28.
69. Trattner, W.I. (1999). From Poor Law to Welfare State. A History of Social Welfare in America, 6th ed. New York: The Free Press.
70. Ueda, S., and Okawa, Y. (2003). The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation 25(11-12):596-601.
71. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Disabled Persons. New York: United Nations.
72. UPIAS and Disability Alliance. (1976). The Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation and The Disability Alliance Discuss Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: The Disability Alliance, Portland Place. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, Ealing.
73. Verbrugge, L.M., and Jette, A.M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science and Medicine 438:1-14.
74. Whiteneck, G. (2003). The ICF: One step forward, one step back, and a few steps to go to a complete model. Presentation to Conference on State of the Science: Outcome Research in Post-Acute Care, April 24-25, 2003, Washington, DC. Organized by Boston University. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/cre/webcast/testwhiteneck.doc.
75. Whiteneck, G. (2006). Conceptual models of disability: Past, present, and future. In M.J. Field, A.M. Jette, and L. Martin (eds.) Workshop on Disability in America: A New Look, 50-66. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
76. Willems, D. (2010). Quality of life: Measure or listen. A reflection for disability studies. Medische Antropologie 22(2):289-91.
77. Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The Principle of Normalization in Human Service. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
78. Wolfensberger, W. (1998). A Brief Introduction to Social Role Valorization: A High-Order Concept for Addressing the Plight of Societally Devalued People, and for Structuring Human Services, 3rd ed. Syracuse, NY: Training Institute for Human Service Planning, Leadership and Change Agentry, Syracuse University.
79. World Health Organization. (1946). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD). Geneva: World Health Organization.
80. World Health Organization. (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva: World Health Organization.
81. World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
82. World Health Organization. (2012). Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.