Separating functional and parallel correctness using nondeterministic sequential specifications

HotPar 2010 - 2nd USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Parallelism

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Burnim, Jacob ^a   Necula, George ^a   Sen, Koushik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATED PROGRAM; AUTOMATED VERIFICATION; FUNCTIONAL CORRECTNESS; INTERLEAVINGS; NON-DETERMINISM; PARALLEL PROGRAM; PARALLELIZATIONS; SEQUENTIAL SPECIFICATIONS;

SPECIFICATIONS;

EID: 85054043032     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. AUTEBERT, J.-M., BERSTEL, J., AND BOASSON, L. Contextfree languages and pushdown automata. 111-174.
2. BALL, T., AND RAJAMANI, S. The SLAM Toolkit. In 13th Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV) (2001), vol. 2102 of LNCS, pp. 260-264.
3. BOCCHINO, R., ADVE, V., ADVE, S., AND SNIR, M. Parallel programming must be deterministic by default. In First USENIX Workship on Hot Topics in Parallelism (HOTPAR 2009) (March 2009).
4. BURNIM, J., AND SEN, K. Asserting and checking determinism for multithreaded programs. In 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (2009), ACM.
5. ELMAS, T., QADEER, S., AND TASIRAN, S. A calculus of atomic actions. In POPL '09: Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages (New York, NY, USA, 2009), ACM, pp. 2-15.
6. FINKEL, A., WILLEMS, B., AND WOLPER, P. A direct symbolic approach to model checking pushdown systems. In Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Verification of Infinite State Systems (INFINITY'97) (1997), vol. 9 of Electronic Notes in Theor. Comp. Sci., Elsevier.
7. FLANAGAN, C. Verifying commit-atomicity using modelchecking. In 11th International SPIN Workshop (2004), pp. 252-266.
8. FLANAGAN, C., AND FREUND, S. N. Atomizer: a dynamic atomicity checker for multithreaded programs. In 31st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL) (2004), pp. 256-267.
9. FLANAGAN, C., AND QADEER, S. A type and effect system for atomicity. In Proc. of the ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming language design and implementation (PLDI'03) (2003), pp. 338-349.
10. FREUND, S. N., AND QADEER, S. Checking concise specifications for multithreaded software. Journal of Object Technology 3, 6 (2004), 81-101.
11. HATCLIFF, J., ROBBY, AND DWYER, M. B. Verifying atomicity specifications for concurrent object-oriented software using model-checking. In Proc. of the International Conference on Verification, Model Checking and Abstract Interpretation (VMCAI' 04) (2004), pp. 175-190.
12. HENZINGER, T., JHALA, R., MAJUMDAR, R., AND SUTRE, G. Lazy Abstraction. In 29th ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL) (2002), pp. 58-70.
13. KULKARNI, M., PINGALI, K., WALTER, B., RAMANARAYANAN, G., BALA, K., AND CHEW, L. P. Optimistic parallelism requires abstractions. In PLDI '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming language design and implementation (New York, NY, USA, 2007), ACM, pp. 211-222.
14. LIPTON, R. J. Reduction: A method of proving properties of parallel programs. Communications of the ACM 18, 12 (1975), 717-721.
15. RAMALINGAM, G. Context-sensitive synchronization-sensitive analysis is undecidable. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 22, 2 (2000), 416-430.
16. S. GRAF, AND H. SAIDI. Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS. In Conference on Computer Aided Verification (CAV'97) (1997), vol. 1254 of LNCS, pp. 72-83.
17. WANG, L., AND STOLLER, S. D. Run-time analysis for atomicity. In 3rd Workshop on Run-time Verification (RV'03) (2003), vol. 89 of ENTCS.
18. WANG, L., AND STOLLER, S. D. Accurate and efficient runtime detection of atomicity errors in concurrent programs. In Proc. ACM SIGPLAN 2006 Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (PPoPP) (Mar. 2006), ACM Press, pp. 137-146.