The belmont report at 40: Reckoning with time

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 108, Issue 10, 2018, Pages 1345-1348

  Adashi, Eli Y ^c   Walters, LeRoy B ^a   Menikoff, Jerry A ^b  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; ALABAMA; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SYPHILIS; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTEER;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; ALABAMA; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SYPHILIS; UNITED STATES; VOLUNTEERS;

EID: 85053828993     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304580     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0012. Available at: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/ bitstream/handle/10822/779133/ohrp_ belmont_report.pdf?sequence= 1&isAllowed=y. Accessed May 3, 2018.
2. Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(24): 1354-1360.
3. Jones JH. Bad Blood. The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1993.
4. Jonsen AR. Commissioning bioethics: the government in bioethics, 1974-1983. In: Jonsen AR, ed. The Birth of Bioethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998:90-98.
5. The National Research Act of 1974. Public law 93-348. Available at: https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/PL93-348.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2018.
6. Capron AM. Building the next bioethics commission. Hastings Cent Rep. 2017;47(suppl 1):S4-S9.
7. Ingelfinger FJ. Ethics of human experimentation defined by a national commission. N Engl J Med. 1977;296(1): 44-45.
8. Report and Recommendations. Institutional Review Boards. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and behavioral Research. DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0008. Available at: https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/ handle/10822/778625/ohrp_institutional_ review_boards_1978.pdf?sequence= 1&isAllowed=y. Accessed May 3, 2018.
9. Beauchamp TL. The origins and evolution of the Belmont Report. In: Beauchamp TL, ed. Standing on Principles: Collected Essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010: 3-17.
10. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1971.
11. Menikoff J, Kaneshiro J, Pritchard I. The common rule, updated. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):613-615.
12. Institute of Medicine. Committee on assessing the system for protecting human research participants. In: Federman DE, Hanna KE, Rodriguez LL, eds. Responsible Research: A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002:1-277.
13. Cassell EJ. The principles of the Belmont report revisited. How have respect for persons, beneficence, and justice been applied to clinical medicine? Hastings Cent Rep. 2000; 30(4):12-21.
14. Beauchamp TL, Childress JE. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013.
15. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO). International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans. Available at: https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf. Accessed May 3, 2018.
16. Veatch RM. Ranking, balancing, or simultaneity: resolving conflicts among the Belmont principles. In: Childress JF, Meslin EM, Shapiro HT, eds. Belmont Revisited. Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2005: 184-204.
17. Emanuel EJ, Weijer C. Protecting Communities in research: from a new principle to rational protections. In: Childress JF, Meslin EM, Shapiro HT, eds. Belmont Revisited. Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2005: 165-184.
18. Bryan CS. HIV/AIDS and bioethics: historical perspective, personal retrospective. Health Care Anal. 2002;10(1): 5-18.
19. Hull SC, Wilson Diné DR. Beyond Belmont: ensuring respect for AI/AN communities through tribal IRBs, laws, and policies. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17(7): 60-62.
20. Friesen P, Kearns L, Redman B, Caplan AL. Rethinking the Belmont Report? Am J Bioeth. 2017;17(7): 15-21.
21. Sherwin S. Belmont revisited through a feminist lens. In: Childress JF, Meslin EM, Shapiro HT, eds. Belmont Revisited. Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2005: 148-165.
22. Faden RR, Kass NE, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013;43(spec no): S16-S27.
23. Kass NE, Faden RR, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight. Hastings Cent Rep. 2013;43(spec no):S4-S15.
24. Walters L. Office for Human Research Protections. Belmont Oral History Project. Available at: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education-and-outreach/ luminaries-lecture-series/belmont-report-25th-anniversary-interview-lwalters/index.html. Accessed May 3, 2018.