Practical Tips for Ethical Data Sharing

Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 131-144

  Meyer, Michelle N ^a  

^a GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

data sharing; IRB; morality; research ethics; responsible conduct of research

Indexed keywords

EID: 85053318871     PISSN: 25152459     EISSN: 25152467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2515245917747656     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. American Psychological Association. (2003). Certification of compliance with APA ethical principles. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/ethics02.pdf
2. American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
3. Barbaro M., Zeller T., (2006, August 9). A face is exposed for AOL searcher No. 4417749. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html?mcubz=0
4. Barth-Jones D., (2012a, August 10). The debate over ‘re-identification’ of health information: What do we risk? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2012/08/10/the-debate-over-re-identification-of-health-information-what-do-we-risk/
5. Barth-Jones D., (2012b). The ‘re-identification’ of Governor William Weld’s medical information: A critical reexamination of health data identification risks and privacy protections, then and now. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2076397
6. Center for Open Science. (n.d.). 8. Approved protected access repositories. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki/8.%20Approved%20Protected%20Access%20Repositories/
7. Cozzarelli N. R., (2004). UPSIDE: Uniform principle for sharing integral data and materials expeditiously. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 3721–3722.
8. Databrary. (n.d.-a). Sample participant release script. Re-trieved from https://www.databrary.org/access/guide/investigators/release/asking/script.html
9. Databrary. (n.d.-b). Video data release template, participants. Retrieved from https://www.databrary.org/access/policies/release-template.html
10. Data Protection Act, c. 29 Part 1 §2 (1998). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/section/2
11. Dataverse. (2017). A comparative review of various data repositories. Retrieved from https://dataverse.org/blog/comparative-review-various-data-repositories
12. de Montjoye Y.-A., Hidalgo C. A., Verleysen M., Blondel V. D. (2013). Unique in the crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports, 3, Article 1376. doi:10.1038/srep01376
13. de Montjoye Y.-A., Radaelli L., Singh V. K., Pentland A. “S.”, (2015). Unique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science, 347, 536–539.
14. Drachen T. M., Ellegaard O., Larsen A. V., Dorch S. B. F., (2016). Sharing data increases citations. LIBER Quarterly, 26, 67–82.
15. El Emam K., Jonker E., Arbuckle L., Malin B. (2011). A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data. PLOS ONE, 6(12), Article e28071. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028071
16. Emanuel E. J., Wendler D., Grady C., (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2701–2711.
17. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. § 46 (2017).
18. Gilmore R. O., Kennedy J. L., Adolph K. E., (2018). Practical solutions for sharing data and materials from psychological research. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 121–130.
19. Gymrek M., McGuire A. L., Golan D., Halperin E., Erlich Y., (2013). Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science, 339, 321–324.
20. Hackett R., (2016, May 18). Researchers caused an uproar by publishing data from 70,000 OkCupid users. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/05/18/okcupid-data-research/
21. Halchenko Y., Gorgolewski C. F., (2015a). Anonymization tools. Retrieved from https://open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io/en/latest/anon_tools.html
22. Halchenko Y., Gorgolewski C. F., (2015b). Sample consent forms. Retrieved from https://open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io/en/latest/samples.html#chap-consent-samples
23. Halchenko Y., Gorgolewski C. F., (2015c). Ultimate consent form. Retrieved from https://open-brain-consent.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ultimate.html#chap-consent-ultimate
24. Henneken E. A., Accomazzi A., (2011). Linking to data—effect on citation rates in astronomy [Abstract]. In Ballester P., (Ed.), Proceedings of ADASS XXI. Book Series: Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series 461 (pp. 763–766). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3618
25. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2017a). Confidentiality. Retrieved from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/datamanagement/confidentiality/index.html
26. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2017b). Guide to social science data preparation and archiving. Phase 5: Preparing data for sharing. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/deposit/guide/chapter5.html
27. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2017c). Recommended informed consent language for data sharing. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/datamanagement/confidentiality/conf-language.html
28. Lunshof J. E., Chadwick R., Vorhaus D. B., Church G. M., (2008). From genetic privacy to open consent. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9, 406–411.
29. Meyer M. N., (2013). Regulating the production of knowledge: Research risk–benefit analysis and the heterogeneity problem. Administrative Law Review, 65, 237–298.
30. Meyer M. N., Chabris C., (2014, July 31). Why psychologists’ food fight matters. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/07/replication_controversy_in_psychology_bullying_file_drawer_effect_blog_posts.html
31. Murphy S. C., (2016). Open science ethics templates. Retrieved from https://github.com/seanchrismurphy/Open-science-ethics-templates
32. Narayanan A., Shmatikov V., (2008). Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (pp. 111–125). Los Alamitos, CA: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
33. National Institutes of Health, Office of Extramural Research. (2007). NIH data sharing policy. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/data_sharing/
34. National Science Foundation. (2014). Grant General Conditions (GC-1). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/gc1/feb14.pdf
35. Nature. (2017). Availability of data, material and methods. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html#data
36. Neyfakh L., (2015, June 18). The ethics of ethnography. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2015/06/alice_goffman_s_on_the_run_is_the_sociologist_to_blame_for_the_inconsistencies.html
37. Office for Human Research Protections. (2008). Coded private information or specimens use in research, guidance (2008). Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/research-involving-coded-private-information/index.html
38. Open Data Commons. (n.d.). ODC Attribution-Sharealike Community Norms. Retrieved from https://opendatacommons.org/norms/odc-by-sa/
39. OpenfMRI. (n.d.). Information on de-identification of fMRI data. Retrieved from https://openfmri.org/de-identification/
40. Open Science Framework. (2016). 1. view the badges. Re-trieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki/1.%20View%20the%20Badges/
41. Ornstein C., (2016, April 21). New York hospital to pay $2.2 million over unauthorized filming of 2 patients. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/22/nyregion/new-york-hospital-to-pay-fine-over-unauthorized-filming-of-2-patients.html
42. PCORI. (2016). Policy for data access and data sharing: Draft for public comment. Retrieved from https://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORI-Data-Access-Data-Sharing-DRAFT-for-Public-Comment-October-2016.pdf
43. Piwowar H. A., Day R. S., Fridsma D. B., (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLOS ONE, 2(3), Article e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
44. Piwowar H. A., Vision T. J., (2013). Data reuse and the open data citation advantage. PeerJ, 1, Article e175. doi:10.7717/peerj.175
45. Science. (2017). Editorial policies. Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/authors/science-editorial-policies
46. Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections. (2011). Attachment D: FAQ’s terms and recommendations on informed consent and research use of biospecimens. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp-committee/recommendations/2011-october-13-letter-attachment-d/
47. Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information, 45 C.F.R. § 160 and 164 (2002).
48. Sweeney L., (2002). k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal on Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10, 557–570.
49. Tockar A., (2014, September 15). Riding with the stars: Passenger privacy in the NYC taxicab dataset. Retrieved from https://research.neustar.biz/2014/09/15/riding-with-the-stars-passenger-privacy-in-the-nyc-taxicab-dataset/
50. Wan Z., Vorobeychik Y., Xia W., Clayton E. W., Kantarcioglu M., Ganta R... Malin B. A., (2015). A game theoretic framework for analyzing re-identification risk. PLOS ONE, 10(3), Article e0120592. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120592
51. The White House. (2016). Precision medicine initiative: Data security policy principles and framework. Retrieved from https://allofus.nih.gov/sites/default/files/PMI_Security_Principles_and_Framework_FINAL_022516.pdf
52. Wicherts J. M., Borsboom D., Kats J., Molenaar D., (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61, 726–728.