Electric field measurement of two commercial active/sham coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation

Journal of Neural Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2018, Pages

  Smith, J Evan ^a,c   Peterchev, Angel V ^a,b,d  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

active; coil; electric field; sham; TMS; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC FIELD MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC FIELDS; THULIUM;

ACTIVE; ACTIVE COUNTERPARTS; COIL; CORTICAL SURFACES; E-FIELD DISTRIBUTIONS; PULSE AMPLITUDE; SHAM; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION;

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTRIC FIELD; SCALP; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; BRAIN; DEVICES; ELECTROMAGNETISM; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

BRAIN; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 85053114645     PISSN: 17412560     EISSN: 17412552     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aace89     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Duecker F and Sack A T 2015 Rethinking the role of sham TMS Front. Psychol. 6 210
2. Davey K R and Riehl M 2006 Suppressing the surface field during transcranial magnetic stimulation IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53 190-4
3. Rossi S et al 2007 A real electro-magnetic placebo (REMP) device for sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 709-16
4. Arana A B et al 2008 Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation? Brain Stimul. 1 44-51
5. Deng Z D and Peterchev A V 2011 Transcranial magnetic stimulation coil with electronically switchable active and sham modes Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. vol 2011 pp 1993-6
6. Carlezon W A Jr et al 2005 Antidepressant-like effects of cranial stimulation within a low-energy magnetic field in rats Biol. Psychiatry 57 571-6
7. Rohan M et al 2004 Low-field magnetic stimulation in bipolar depression using an MRI-based stimulator Am. J. Psychiatry 161 93-8
8. Rohan M L et al 2014 Rapid mood-elevating effects of low field magnetic stimulation in depression Biol. Psychiatry 76 186-93
9. Rohan M L, Yamamoto R T, Ruzicka W, Copersino M, Fuller S, Murphy M, Wellons C and Cohen B 2017 Sustained improvement in mood after 3 days of low field magnetic stimulation in subjects with bipolar depression Biol. Psychiatry 81 S260-1
10. Martiny K, Lunde M and Bech P 2010 Transcranial low voltage pulsed electromagnetic fields in patients with treatment-resistant depression Biol. Psychiatry 68 163-9
11. Volkow N D et al 2010 Effects of low-field magnetic stimulation on brain glucose metabolism NeuroImage 51 623-8
12. Opitz A, Legon W, Mueller J, Barbour A, Paulus W and Tyler W J 2014 Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics Frontiers Hum. Neurosci. 8 1043
13. Nieminen J O, Koponen L and Ilmoniemi R J 2015 Experimental characterization of the electric field distribution induced by TMS devices Brain Stimul. 8 582-9
14. Wang B, Shen M R, Deng Z-D, Smith J E, Tharayil J J, Gurrey C J, Gomez L J and Peterchev A V 2018 Redesigning existing transcranial magnetic stimulation coils to reduce energy: application to low field magnetic stimulation J. Neural Eng. 15 036022
15. Deng Z D, Lisanby S H and Peterchev A V 2013 Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs Brain Stimul. 6 1-13
16. Krieg T D, Salinas F S, Narayana S, Fox P T and Mogul D J 2015 Computational and experimental analysis of TMS-induced electric field vectors critical to neuronal activation J. Neural Eng. 12 046014
17. MagVenture 2017 Cool-coil system: user manual US
18. Deng Z D, Lisanby S H and Peterchev A V 2013 Controlling stimulation strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy via current amplitude and electrode size and spacing: comparison with magnetic seizure therapy J. ECT 29 325-35