User incentive model and its optimization scheme in user-participatory fog computing environment

Computer Networks

Volumn 145, Issue , 2018, Pages 76-88

  Kim, Won Suk ^a   Chung, Sang Hwa ^a  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Fog computing; Fog container placement; Internet of things; Optimization; Software defined networking; User incentive

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; FOG; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; INTERNET OF THINGS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKING;

COMPUTING ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS; FEASIBILITY PROBLEM; MIXED-INTEGER NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; OPTIMIZATION SCHEME; PROPOSED ARCHITECTURES; USER INCENTIVE;

FOG COMPUTING;

EID: 85053037580     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., Addepalli, S., Fog computing and its role in the Internet of Things. Proc. ACM MCC, 2012, 13–15.
2. Yi, S., Li, C., Li, Q., A survey of fog computing: concepts, applications and issues. Proc. ACM Mobidata, June 2015, 37–42.
3. Yi, S., Hao, Z., Qin, Z., Li, Q., Fog computing: platform and applications. Proc. 3rd IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies (HotWeb), November 2015, 73–78.
4. Yannuzzi, M., Milito, R., Serral-Gracià, R., Montero, D., Nemirovsky, M., Key ingredients in an IoT recipe: fog computing, cloud computing, and more Fog Computing. Proc. IEEE CAMAD, December 2014, 325–329.
5. Vaquero, L.M., Rodero-Merino, L., Finding your way in the fog: towards a comprehensive definition of fog computing. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 44:October (5) (2014), 27–32.
6. T.H. Luan et al., Fog computing: focusing on mobile users at the edge, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1502.01815v3, March 2016.
7. Gia, T.N., et al. Fog computing in healthcare Internet of Things: a case study on ECG feature extraction. Proc. IEEE CIT, October 2015, 356–363.
8. Dubey, H., et al. Fog data: enhancing telehealth big data through fog computing. Proc. ASE BD&SI, October 2015, 1–6.
9. Truong, N.B., Lee, G.M., Ghamri-Doudane, Y., Software defined networking-based vehicular adhoc network with fog computing. Proc IFIP/IEEE IM, May. 2015, 1202–1207.
10. Chiang, M., Zhang, T., Fog and IoT: an overview of research opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J. 3:December (6) (2016), 854–864.
11. Dastjerdi, A.V., Buyya, R., Fog computing: helping the internet of things realize its potential. Computer 49:August (8) (2016), 112–116.
12. Marín-Tordera, E., Masip-Bruin, X., García-Almiñana, J., Jukan, A., Ren, G., Zhu, J., Do we all really know what a fog node is? Current trends towards an open definition. Comput. Commun. 109 (2017), 117–130 September.
13. Satyanarayanan, M., Bahl, P., Caceres, R., Davies, N., The case for VM-based cloudlets in mobile computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 8:October (4) (2009), 14–23.
14. Büsching, F., Schildt, S., Wolf, L., DroidCluster: towards smartphone cluster computing – the streets are paved with potential computer clusters. Proc. ICDCSW, Jun., 2012, 114–117.
15. Bitam, S., Mellouk, A., ITS-cloud: cloud computing for intelligent transportation system. Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, December 2012, 2054–2059.
16. What is Docker, 2017. [Online]. Available (Accessed 3 September) https://www.docker.com/what-docker.
17. Newaz, S.H., Towards realizing the importance of placing fog computing facilities at the central office of a PON. Proc. IEEE ICACT, February 2017, 152–157.
18. Lewis, A., Ghosh, S., Tzeng, N., Run-time energy consumption estimation based on workload in server systems. Proc. USENIX HotPower, December 2008, 1–5.
19. Economou, D., Rivoire, S., Kozyrakis, C., Ranganathan, P., Full-system power analysis and modeling for server environments. Proc. IEEE MoBS, June 2006, 1–8.
20. Yan, S., Peng, M., Wang, W., User access mode selection in fog computing based radio access networks. Proc. IEEE ICC, May. 2016, 1–6.
21. Peng, M., Yan, S., Zhang, K., Wang, C., Fog-computing-based radio access networks: issues and challenges. IEEE Netw. 30:July (4) (2016), 46–53.
22. Tang, B., et al. A hierarchical distributed fog computing architecture for big data analysis in smart cities. Proc. ASE BD&SI, October 2015, 1–6.
23. Nishio, T., Shinkuma, R., Takahashi, T., Mandayam, N.B., Service-oriented heterogeneous resource sharing for optimizing service latency in mobile cloud. Proc. ACM MobileCloud, July 2013, 19–26.
24. Hong, K., Lillethun, D., Ramachandran, U., Ottenwälder, B., Koldehofe, B., Mobile fog: a programming model for large-scale applications on the Internet of Things. Proc. ACM MCC, August 2013, 15–20.
25. Sarkar, S., Chatterjee, S., Misra, S., Assessment of the suitability of fog computing in the context of Internet of Things. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 6:January/March (1) (2018), 46–59.
26. Do, C.T., Tran, N.H., Pham, C., Alam, M.G.R., Son, J.H., Hong, C.S., A proximal algorithm for joint resource allocation and minimizing carbon footprint in geo-distributed fog computing. Proc. IEEE ICOIN, January 2015, 324–329.
27. Jalali, F., Hinton, K., Ayre, R., Alpcan, T., Tucker, R.S., Fog computing may help to save energy in cloud computing. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 34(May (5)), 2016.
28. Yao, H., Bai, C., Zeng, D., Liang, Q., Fan, Y., Migrate or not? Exploring virtual machine migration in roadside cloudlet-based vehicular cloud. Concurr. Computation: Pract. Exp. 27:December (18) (2015), 5780–5792.
29. Deng, R., Lu, R., Lai, C., Luan, T.H., Towards power consumption-delay tradeoff by workload allocation in cloud-fog computing. Proc. IEEE ICC, June 2015, 3909–3914.
30. Baccarelli, E., Naranjo, P.G.V., Scarpiniti, M., Shojafar, M., Abawajy, J.H., Fog of everything: Energy-efficient networked computing architectures, research challenges, and a case study. IEEE Access, 5, 2017.
31. Openfog reference architecture, accessed on June 07, 2017. [Online]. Available https://www.openfogconsortium.org/ra/.
32. Masip-Bruin, X., Marín-Tordera, E., Tashakor, G., Jukan, A., Ren, G.J., Foggy clouds and cloudy fogs: a real need for coordinated management of fog-to-cloud computing systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 23(October (5)), 2016.
33. Lee, H., Nakao, A., A study of user incentive mechanism in named data networking. Proc IEEE COMSNETS, January 2015, 1–8.
34. Li, Y., Shen, B., Zhang, J., Gan, X., Wang, J., Wang, X., Offloading in HCNs: congestion-aware network selection and user incentive design. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. vol. 16:October (10) (2017), 6479–6492.
35. Arkian, H.R., Diyanat, A., Pourkhalili, A., MIST: fog-based data analytics scheme with cost-efficient resource provisioning for IoT crowdsensing applications. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. vol. 82:March (C) (2017), 152–165.
36. Gupta, M.K., Amgoth, T., Resource-aware algorithm for virtual machine placement in cloud environment. Proc. IEEE IC3, August 2016, 1–6.
37. Kim, W., Chung, S., User-participatory fog computing Architecture and its management schemes for improving feasibility. IEEE Access vol. 6 (March 2018), 20262–20278.
38. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S., Computers and Intractability; a Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. 1979, Freeman, New York, 245–248.
39. Mahadevan, P., Sharma, P., Banerjee, S., Ranganathan, P., A power benchmarking framework for network devices. Proc. NETWORKING, May. 2009, 795–808.
40. Meisner, D., Gold, B.T., Wenisch, T.F., PowerNap: eliminating server idle power. ACM ASPLOS, March 2009, 205–216.
41. Morabito, R., Power consumption of virtualization technologies: an empirical investigation. IEEE/ACM UCC, December 2015, 522–527.
42. Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., Eckstein, J., Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends® Mach. Learn. vol. 3:January (1) (2011), 1–122.
43. Zhu, M., Martínez, S., On distributed convex optimization under inequality and equality constraints. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 57:January (1) (2012), 151–164.