Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design

Participatory Design: Principles and Practices

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 123-155

  Blomberg, Jeanette ^a   Giacomi, Jean ^b   Mosher, Andrea ^b   Swenton Wall, Pat ^b  

^a PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b XEROX CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE; FIELD METHODS; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; WORK PRACTICES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85052771892     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203744338     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Agar, M. (1980). The professional stranger. New York: Academic Press.
2. Agar, M. (1986). Speaking of ethnography. Qualitative Research Methods, 2, 11-78.
3. Arensberg, C ., & Niehoff, A. (1971). Introducing social change: A manual for community development. Chicago: Aldine/Atherton.
4. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Blomberg, J. (1987). Social interaction and office communication: Effects on user evaluation of new technologies: In R. Kraut (Ed.), Technology and the transformation of white collar work (pp. 195-210). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Blomberg, J. (1988a). The variable impact of computer technologies on the organization of work activities. In I. Greif (Ed.), Computer-supported cooperative work: A book of readings (pp. 771-781). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
7. Blomberg, J. (1988b, February). Social aspects of operability: Ethnography of photocopiers. Paper Presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting, Boston.
8. Blomberg. J. (1989). Workshop on ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. Presented to Xerox Industrial Design/Human Interface Department. Rochester, NY.
9. Blomberg, J., & Henderson, A. (1990). Reflections on participatory design: Lessons from the Trillium community. In J. C. Chew & J. Whiteside (Eds.), Human factors in computing systems, CHI '90 Conference Proceedings (pp. 353-359). New York: ACM.
10. Briggs, C. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cicourel, A. (1982). Interviews, surveys, and the problem of ecological validity. American Sociologist, 17, 11-20.
12. Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture: Twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G.E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Council of the American Anthropological Association (1971). Statements on ethics: Principles of professional responsibility. In J. Cassell & S. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook on ethical issues in Anthropology (pp. 96-100). Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
15. Crane, J., & Angrosino, G. (1974). Field projects in anthropology: A student handbook. 2nd edition. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
16. Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Gummessons.
17. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
18. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
19. Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283-307.
20. Greif, I. (Ed.). (1988). Computer-supported cooperative work: A book o f readings. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Harris, M. (1979). Cultural materialism: The struggle for a science of culture. New York: Random House.
22. Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Introduction: In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 1-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Jackson, J. (1990). “Deja entendu”: The liminal qualities of anthropological fieldnotes. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19, 8-43.
24. Jordan, B. (1987). Method in sociocultural anthropology. Course notes, Michigan State University.
25. Jordan, B., Henderson, A., & Tatar, D. (in preparation). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Palo Alto: Institute for Research on Learning and Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
26. Kluckhohn, C. (1940). The conceptual structure in middle American studies. The Maya and their neighbors. New York: Appleton-Century.
27. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Nader, L. (1974). Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained by studying up: In D. Hymes (Ed.), Reinventing anthropology (pp. 284-311). New York: Vintage Books.
30. Naroll, R., & Cohen, R. (Eds.). (1970). Handbook of method in cultural anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.
31. Niehoff, A. (1966). A casebook of social change. Chicago: Aldine.
32. Pelto, P. J. (1970). Anthropological research. New York: Harper and Row.
33. Penniman, T. K. (1974). A hundred years of anthropology. New York: Morrow.
34. Strathem, M. (1987). The limits of auto-anthropology: In A. Jackson (Ed.), Anthropology at home (pp. 16-37). London: Tavistock Publishers.
35. Suchman, L., & Jordan, B. (1990). Validity and the collaborative construction of meaning in faceto-face survey interviews: An interaction analysis. Palo Alto: Institute for Research on Learning Report No. IRL 90-0019.
36. Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. (1990). Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work: Approaches to collaborative design (pp. 65-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
37. Tyler, S. (1979). The said and the unsaid: Mind, meaning and culture. New York: Academic Press.
38. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Whiting, B., & Whiting, J. (1970). Methods for observing and recording behavior: In R. Naroll & R. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of method in cultural anthropology (pp. 282-315). New York: Columbia University Press.
40. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). Making a study “more ethnographic.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19, 44-72.