Selective constraint and the evolution of the RNA polymerase II C-Terminal domain

Transcription

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages

  Stump, Aram D ^a   Ostrozhynska, Khrystyna ^a  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CTD; dN dS; Eukaryote evolution; Purifying selection; RNA POLYMERASE II; Selective constraint

Indexed keywords

PROLINE; RNA POLYMERASE II; SERINE;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ENZYME PURIFICATION; ENZYME SUBUNIT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CTD; DN/DS; ENZYMOLOGY; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; FUNGUS; LEISHMANIA; METABOLISM; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; PURIFYING SELECTION; SELECTIVE CONSTRAINT;

CTD; DN/DS; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; PURIFYING SELECTION; RNA POLYMERASE II; SELECTIVE CONSTRAINT;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FUNGI; LEISHMANIA; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, AMINO ACID; RNA POLYMERASE II;

EID: 85052430032     PISSN: 21541264     EISSN: 21541272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/trns.23305     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Archambault J, Friesen JD. Genetics of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III. Microbiol Rev 1993; 57:703-24; PMID:8246845.
2. Cramer P, Bushnell DA, Kornberg RD. Structural basis of transcription: RNA polymerase II at 2.8 angstrom resolution. Science 2001; 292:1863-76; PMID:11313498; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sci-ence.1059493.
3. Allison LA, Moyle M, Shales M, Ingles CJ. Extensive homology among the largest subunits of eukaryotic and prokaryotic RNA polymerases. Cell 1985; 42:599-610; PMID:3896517; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(85)90117-5.
4. Corden JL, Cadena DL, Ahearn JM Jr., Dahmus ME. A unique structure at the carboxyl terminus of the largest subunit of eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1985; 82:7934-8; PMID:2999785; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.23.7934.
5. Stiller JW, Hall BD. Evolution of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:6091-6; PMID:11972039; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082646199.
6. Bartkowiak B, Mackellar AL, Greenleaf AL. Updating the CTD story: From tail to epic. Genet Res Int 2011; 2011:623718; PMID: 22567360; http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/623718.
7. Zhang DW, Rodriguez-Molina JB, Tietjen JR, Nemec CM, Ansari AZ. Emerging views on the CTD code. Genet Res Int 2012; 2012:347214; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/347214.
8. Buratowski S. Progression through the RNA polymerase II CTD cycle. Mol Cell 2009; 36:541-6; PMID:19941815; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mol-cel.2009.10.019.
9. Allison LA, Wong JK, Fitzpatrick VD, Moyle M, Ingles CJ. The C-terminal domain of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and mammals: a conserved structure with an essential function. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8:321-9; PMID:3122024.
10. Liu P, Kenney JM, Stiller JW, Greenleaf AL. Genetic organization, length conservation, and evolution of RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain. Mol Biol Evol 2010; 27:2628-41; PMID:20558594; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq151.
11. Dacks JB, Marinets A, Ford Doolittle W, Cavalier-Smith T, Logsdon JM Jr. Analyses of RNA Polymerase II genes from free-living protists: phylogeny, long branch attraction, and the eukaryotic big bang. Mol Biol Evol 2002; 19:830-40; PMID:12032239; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004140.
12. Lane CE, van den Heuvel K, Kozera C, Curtis BA, Parsons BJ, Bowman S, et al. Nucleomorph genome of Hemiselmis andersenii reveals complete intron loss and compaction as a driver of protein structure and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:19908-13; PMID:18077423; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707419104.
13. Chapman RD, Heidemann M, Hintermair C, Eick D. Molecular evolution of the RNA polymerase II CTD. Trends Genet 2008; 24:289-96; PMID:18472177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2008.03.010.
14. Das A, Bellofatto V. The non-canonical CTD of RNAP-II is essential for productive RNA synthesis in Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6959; PMID:19742309; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006959
15. Llopart A, Aguadé M. Synonymous rates at the RpII215 gene of Drosophila: variation among species and across the coding region. Genetics 1999; 152:269-80; PMID:10224259
16. Gilson PR, Su V, Slamovits CH, Reith ME, Keeling PJ, McFadden GI. Complete nucleotide sequence of the chlorarachniophyte nucleomorph: nature's smallest nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:9566-71; PMID:16760254; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600707103.
17. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792-7; PMID:15034147; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.
18. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, et al. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36(Web Server issue):W465-9; PMID:18424797; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn180.
19. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540-52; PMID:10742046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334.
20. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:2104-5; PMID:15647292; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti263.
21. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39(Web Server issue):W475-8; PMID:21470960; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr201.
22. Yang Z, Swanson WJ. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes. Mol Biol Evol 2002; 19:49-57; PMID:11752189; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003981