Morphometries of craniofacial form

Fundamentals of Craniofacial Growth

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 155-187

  Lestrel, Pete E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85051929422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203755327     Document Type: Chapter

References (215)

1. Afifi, AA and Clark, V: Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold, NY, 1984.
2. Albrecht, GH: Some comments on the use of ratios. Syst. Zool., 1978, 27:67-71.
3. Albrecht, GH: Multivariate analysis and the study of form, with special reference to canonical variate analysis. Am. Zool., 1980, 20:679-693.
4. Albrecht, GH: Assessing the affinities of fossils using canonical variates and generalized distances. Hum. Evol, 1992, 7:49-69.
5. Albrecht, GH, Gelvin, BR, and Hartman, SE: Ratios as size adjustment in morphometries. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1993, 91:441-468.
6. Aldenderfer, MS and Blashfield, RK: Cluster Analysis. Quant. Appl. Soc. Sci. Ser. No. 44. Sage Pub. Inc. Beverly Hills, 1984.
7. Almgren, FJ: Minimal surface forms. Math. Intell., 1982, 4:164-172.
8. Almgren, FJ and Taylor, J: The geometry of soap and soap bubbles. Sci. Am., 1976, 235:82-93.
9. Anderberg, MR: Cluster Analysis for Applications. Academic Press, NY, 1973.
10. Atchley, WR: Ratios, regression intercepts, and the scaling of data. Syst. Zool., 1978, 27:78-83.
11. Atchley, WR, Gaskins, CT, and Anderson, D: Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results. Syst. Zool., 1976, 25:137-148.
12. Bathe, KJ and Wilson, EL: Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1976.
13. Baughan, B and Demirjian, A: Sexual dimorphism in the growth of the cranium. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1978, 49:383-390.
14. Beddow, JK: Recent applications of morphological analysis, in Particle Characterization in Technology. Vol II. Morphological Analysis, Beddow, JK, Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1984, 149-173.
15. Bernstein, IH: Applied Multivariate Analysis. Springer-Verlag, NY, 1988.
16. Blackith, RE and Reyment, RA: Multivariate Morphometries. Academic Press, NY, 1971.
17. Blum, H: A transformation for extracting new descriptors of shape, in Models for the perception of speech and visual form, Wathen-Dunn, W, Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1967, 362-380.
18. Blum, H: Biological shape and visual science. J. Theoret. Biol., 1973, 38:205-87.
19. Blum, H and Nagel, RN: Shape description using weighted symmetric axis features. Pattern. Recog., 1978, 10:167-180.
20. Bookstein, FL: Orthogenesis of the hominids: an exploration using biorthogonal grids. Science, 1977, 197:901-904.
21. Bookstein, FL: The measurement of biological shape and shape change. Lecture notes in biomathematics. Springer-Verlag, NY, 1978, 24:1-191.
22. Bookstein, FL: The line skeleton. Comp. Graph. Imag. Proc, 1979, 11:123-137.
23. Bookstein, FL: On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. Am. J. Orthod., 1982, 82:177-182.
24. Bookstein, FL: Foundations of morphometries. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1982, 13:451-70.
25. Bookstein, FL: Geometry of craniofacial growth invariants. Am. J. Orthod., 1983, 83:221-234.
26. Bookstein, FL: A statistical method for biological shape comparisons. J. Theor. Biol., 1984, 107:475-520.
27. Bookstein, FL: Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Stat. Sci., 1986, 1:181-242.
28. Bookstein, FL: Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
29. Bracewell, RN: The Fourier transform. Sci. Am., 1989, 260:86-95.
30. Brakke, KA: The surface evolver. Exp. Math., 1992, 1:141-165.
31. Bribiesca, E and Guzman, A: How to measure pure form and how to measure differences in shapes using shape numbers. Pattern. Recog., 1980, 12:101-112.
32. Brigham, EO: The Fast Fourier Transform. Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1974.
33. Buck, AM: Variation within trabecular networks of the lumbar vertebrae in modern humans. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1990, Suppl. 14:55.
34. Cacoullos, T: Discriminant Analysis and Applications. Academic Press, NY, 1973.
35. Campbell, NA and Atchley, WR: The geometry of canonical variate analysis. Syst. Zool., 1981, 30:268-280.
36. Carslaw, HS: An Introduction to the Theory of Fourier’s Series and Integrals, 3rd ed., Dover Publishers, NY, 1950.
37. Cartmill, M: A critique of homology as a morphological concept. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1994, 94:115-124.
38. Cattell, RB: Factor analysis: an introduction to essentials. I. The purpose and underlying models. Biometrics, 1965a, 21:190-215.
39. Cattell, RB: Factor analysis: an introduction to essentials. II. The role of factor analysis in research. Biometrics, 1965b, 21:405-435.
40. Challis, RE and Kitney, RI: Biomedical signal processing (in four parts) Part 2. The frequency transforms and their interrelationships. Med. Biol. Engr. Comput., 1991, 29:1-17.
41. Cheverud, JM, and Richtsmeier, JT: Finite-element scaling applied to sexual dimorphism in rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatto) facial growth. Syst. Zool, 1986, 35:381-399.
42. Cheverud, JM, Lewis, JL, Bachrach, W, and Lew, WD: The measurement of form and variation in form: an application of three-dimensional quantitative morphology by finite-element methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1983, 62:151-163.
43. Clark, MW: Quantitative shape analysis: A review. Math. Geol, 1981, 13:303-320.
44. Comrey, AL: A First Course in Factor Analysis. Academic Press, NY, 1973.
45. Cooley, JW and Tukey, JW: An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math Comput., 1965, 19:297-301.
46. Corner, BD and Richtsmeier, JT: Cranial growth and growth dimorphism. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1993, 92:371-394.
47. Corruccini, RS: Size and shape in similarity coefficients based on metric characters. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1973, 38:743-754.
48. Corruccini, RS: Multivariate analysis in biological anthropology: some considerations. J. Hum. Evol, 1975, 4:1-19.
49. Corrucinni, RS: Correlation properties of morphometric ratios. Sys. Zool, 1977, 26:211-214.
50. Daegling, DJ: Shape variation in the mandibular symphysis of apes: an application of a median axis method. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1993, 91:505-516.
51. Davis, JC: Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, 2nd ed., John Wiley, 1986.
52. Delfino, VP, Colonna, M, Vacca, E, Potente, F, and Introna, J: Computer-aided skull/face superimposition. Am. J. Foren. Med. Path., 1986, 7:201-212.
53. Diaz, G, Zuccarelli, A, Pelligra, I, and Ghiani, A: Elliptic Fourier analysis of cell and nuclear shapes. Comp. Biomed. Res., 1989, 22:405-414.
54. Diaz, G, Quacci, D, and Dell’Orbo, C: Recognition of cell surface modulation by elliptic Fourier analysis. Comp. Meth. Prog. Biomed., 1990, 31:57-62.
55. Dodson, P: On the use of ratios on growth studies. Syst. Zool, 1978, 27:62-67.
56. Ehrlich, R, Baxter, Pharr, R, Jr., and Healy-Williams, N: Comments on the validity of Fourier descriptors in systematics: a reply to Bookstein et al. Syst. Zool., 1983, 32:202-206.
57. Ehrlich, R and Full, WE: Comments on “Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis and analysis of coordinates” by F. James Rohlf. Math. Geol, 1986, 18:855-857.
58. Ferrario, VF, Sforza, C, Gianni, AB, Pogio, CE, and Schmitz, J: Analysis of chewing movement using Elliptic Fourier descriptors. Int. J. Adult Orthod. Orthognath. Surg., 1990, 5:53-57.
59. Ferrario, VF, Sforza, C, Miani, A, Pogio, CE, and Schmitz, J: Cephalometrics and facial shape: new thresholds by an overall approach to classic standards. Int. J. Adult Orthod. Orthognath. Surg., 1991, 6:261-269.
60. Ferrario, VF, Sforza, C, Miani, A, Pogio, CE, and Schmitz, J: Harmonic analysis and clustering of facial profiles. Int. J. Adult Orthod. Orthognath. Surg., 1992, 7:171-179.
61. Ferson, S, Rohlf, FJ, and Koehn, RK: Measuring shape variation of two dimensional outlines. Syst. Zool., 1985, 43:59-68.
62. Fisher, RA: The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugen. (Lond), 1936, 7:179-188.
63. Full, WE and Ehrlich, R: Some approaches for location of centroids of quartz grain outlines to increase homology between Fourier amplitude spectra. Math. Geol., 1982, 14:43-55.
64. Full, WE and Ehrlich, R: Fundamental problems associated with “eigenshape analysis” and similar “factor” analysis procedures. Math. Geol., 1986, 18:451-463.
65. Gordon, AD: Classification. Chapman and Hall, London, 1981.
66. Halazonetis, DJ, Shapiro, E, Gheewalla, RK, and Clark, RE: Quantitative description of the shape of the mandible. Am. J Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., 1991, 99:49-56.
67. Hamming, RW: Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd ed., Dover Publishers, 1973.
68. Hays, HR: Birds, Beasts and Men. Penguin Books, Baltimore, 1972.
69. Hills, M: On Ratios-A response to Atchley, Gaskins, and Anderson. Syst. Zool, 1978, 27:61-62.
70. Hjortsjo, C and Lindegard, B: Critical aspects on the use of indices in physical anthropology. Kungl. Fysiograf. Stills. Forhandl. (Lund)., 1953, 23:1-9.
71. Hotelling, HO: The generalization of Student’s ratio. Ann. Math. Statist., 1931, 2:360-378.
72. Huiskes, R and Chao, EYS: A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: the first decade, J. Biomech, 1983, 16:385-09.
73. Huxley, JS: Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London, 1932.
74. Huxley, JS: Relative growth and form transformation. Proc. Roy. Soc. (Lond) B, 1950, 137:465-469.
75. Inoue, M: Fourier analysis of the forehead shape of skull and sex determination by use of the computer. Foren. Sci. Int., 1990, 47:101-112.
76. Johnson, DR: Shape of vertebrae-An application of a generalized method. In Normal and Abnormal Bone Growth: Basic and Clinical Research, Dixon, AD and Sarnat, BG, Eds., Alan R. Liss, NY, 1985, 295-306.
77. Jolicoeur, P and Mosimann, JE: Size and shape variation in painted turtle: a principal components analysis. Growth, 1960, 24:339-354.
78. Kaesler, RL: Numerical taxonomy in invertebrate paleontology, in Essays in Paleontology and Stratigraphy, Teichert, C and Yochelson, EL, Eds., University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS, 1967, 63-81.
79. Kaye, BH and Naylor, AG: An optical information procedure for characterizing the shape of fine particle images. Pattern Recog., 1972, 4:195-199.
80. Kennedy, DN, Filipek, PA, and Caviness, VS: Fourier shape analysis of anatomic structures, in Recent Advances in Fourier Analysis and its Applications. Byrnes, JS and Byrnes, JF, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1990, 17-28.
81. Kieler, J, Skubis, K, Grzesik, W, Strojny, P, Wisniewski, J, and Dziedzic-Goclawska, A: Spreading of cells on various substrates evaluated by Fourier analysis of shape. Histochemistry, 1989, 92:141-148.
82. Kim, J and Mueller, CW: Introduction to factor analysis. Quat. Appl. Soc. Sci. Ser. No. 13. Sage Pub. Inc., Beverly Hills, 1978, 79.
83. Kim, J and Mueller, CW: Factor analysis. Quat. Appl. Soc. Sci. Ser. No. 14. Sage Pub. Inc., Beverly Hills, 1978, 87.
84. Kincaid, DT and Schneider, RB: Quantification of leaf shape with a microcomputer and Fourier transform. Can. J. Bot., 1983, 61:2333-2342.
85. Kiryati, N and Maydan, D: Calculating geometric properties from Fourier representation. Pattern Recog., 1989, 22:469-475.
86. Klecka, WR: Discriminant analysis. Quat. Appl. Soc. Sci. Ser. No. 19. Sage Pub. Inc. Beverly Hills, 1980, 70.
87. Kline, M: Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times (Vols 1-3). Oxford University Press, 1972, 1211.
88. Kuhl, FP and Giardina, CR: Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comp. Graph. Imag. Proc, 1982, 18:236-258.
89. Lee, DT: Medial axis transformation of a planar shape. IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. Mach. Intel, 1982, PAMI-4:363-369.
90. Le Minor, JM, Pister, L, and Kahn, E: Shape description on osteology using automatic Fourier analysis. Arch. Anat. Hist. Embr. Norm. Exp., 1989, 72:69-79.
91. Lele, S: Some comments on coordinate free and scale invariant methods in morphometries. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1991, 85:407-417.
92. Lele, S: Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Math. Geol, 1993, 25:573-602.
93. Lele, S and Richtsmeier, JT: Statistical models in morphometries: are they realistic? Syst. Zool, 1990, 39:60-69.
94. Lele, S and Richtsmeier, JT: Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1991, 86:415-427.
95. Lele, S and Richtsmeier, JT: On comparing biological shapes: Detection of influential landmarks. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1992, 87:49-66.
96. Lestrel, PE: Some problems in the assessment of morphological size and shape differences. Yearbk. Phys. Anthropol, 1974, 18:140-62.
97. Lestrel, PE: A quantitative approach to skeletal morphology: Fourier analysis. Soc. Phot. Inst. Engrs. (SPIE), 1980, 166:80-93.
98. Lestrel, PE: A Fourier analytic procedure to describe complex morphological shapes, in Factors and Mechanisms Influencing Bone Growth. Dixon, AD and Sarnat, BG, Eds., Alan R. Liss, NY, 1982, 393-409.
99. Lestrel, PE: A new quantitative method for fitting growth data: elliptical Fourier functions. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1987, 72:224.
100. Lestrel, PE: Method for analyzing complex two-dimensional forms: elliptical Fourier functions. Am. J. Hum. Biol, 1989a, 1:149-64.
101. Lestrel, PE: Some approaches toward the mathematical modeling of the craniofacial complex. J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol, 1989b, 9:77-91.
102. Lestrel, PE and Roche, AF: Fourier analysis of the cranium in Trisomy IX.Growth, 1976, 40:385-398.
103. Lestrel, PE and Brown, HD: Fourier analysis of adolescent growth of the cranial vault: A longitudinal study. Hum. Biol, 1976, 48:517-528.
104. Lestrel, PE, Kimber, WH, Prior, FW, and Fleischmann, ML: Size and shape of the hominoid distal femur: Fourier analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1977, 46:281-290.
105. Lestrel, PE and Moore, RN: Macaca nemestrina: a quantitative analysis of size and shape. J. Dent. Res., 1978, 57:395-401. Erratum 57:947.
106. Lestrel, PE and Roche, AF: The cranial thickness in Down’s syndrome: Fourier analysis. Proc. 1st. Int. Cong. Aux. (Milan), 1979, 1:109-115.
107. Lestrel, PE and Sirianni, JE: The cranial base in Macaca nemestrina: shape changes during adolescence. Hum. Biol, 1982, 54:7-21.
108. Lestrel, PE and Roche, AF: Cranial base variation with age: a longitudinal study of shape using Fourier analysis. Hum. Biol, 1986, 58:527-540.
109. Lestrel, PE, Stevenson, RG, and Swindler, DR: A comparative study of the primate cranial base: elliptical Fourier functions. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1988, 75:239.
110. Lestrel, PE, Sarnat, BG, and McNabb, EG: Carapace growth of the turtle Chrysemys scripta: a longitudinal study of shape using Fourier analysis. Anat. Anz. (Jena), 1989, 168:135-143.
111. Lestrel, PE, Engstrom, C, Chaconas, SJ, and Bodt, A: A longitudinal study of the human nasal bone in Norma lateralis: size and shape considerations, in Fundamentals of Bone Growth: Methodology and Applications. Dixon, AD, Sarnat, BG, and Hoyle, DAN, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991, 547-564.
112. Lestrel, PE and Kerr, WJS: Shape changes due to functional appliances. Calif. Dent. J., 1992, 20:30-6.
113. Lestrel, PE and Kerr, WJS: Quantification of functional regulator therapy using elliptical Fourier functions. Europ. J. Orthod., 1993, 15:481-491.
114. Lestrel, PE, Bodt, A, and Swindler, DR: Longitudinal study of cranial base changes in Macaca nemestrina. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1993, 91:117-129.
115. Lestrel, PE, Sarnat, BG, Read, DW, Wolfe, CA, and Bodt, A: Three dimensional characterization of eye orbit shape: Fourier descriptors. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., Suppl, 1993, 16:134.
116. Lestrel, PE, Huggare, JA, Ghiai, M, Matinfar, F, and Wolfe, CA: Cranial base changes in shunt-treated hydrocephalics: Fourier descriptors. J. Dent. Res., 1994, 73:444.
117. Lestrel, PE: Introduction and overview of Fourier descriptors, in Fourier Descriptors and Their Applications in Biology. Lestrel, PE, Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press (1997).
118. Lestrel, PE, Read, DW, and Wolfe, CA: Size and shape of the rabbit orbit: 3-D Fourier descriptors, in Fourier Descriptors and their Applications in Biology. Lestrel, PE, Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press (1997).
119. Lew, WD and Lewis, JL: An anthropometric scaling method with application to the knee joint. J. Biomech., 1977, 10:171-181.
120. Lewis, JL, Lew, WD, and Zimmerman, JR: A nonhomogeneous anthropometric scaling method based on finite element principles. J. Biomech., 1980, 13:815-824.
121. Lin, CS and Hwang, CL: New forms of shape invariants from elliptic Fourier descriptors. Pattern Recog., 1987, 20:535-545.
122. Lohmann, GP: Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: a general morphometric procedure for describing changes in shape. Math. Geol., 1983, 15:659-672.
123. Lohmann, GP and Schweitzer, PN: On eigenshape analysis, in Proc. Michigan Morphometric Workshop. Rohlf, FJ and Bookstein, FL, Eds., University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Pub. No. 2, 1990, 147-166.
124. Lozanoff, S and Diewert, VM: A computer graphics program for measuring two-and three-dimensional form change in developing craniofacial cartilages using finite element methods. Comp. Biomed. Res., 1989, 22:63-82.
125. Lozanoff, S, Zingeser, MR, and Diewert, VM: Computerized modeling of nasal capsular morphogenesis in prenatal primates. Clin. Anat., 1993, 6:37-47.
126. Lu, KH: Harmonic analysis of the human face. Biometrics, 1965, 21:491-505.
127. Lubischew, AA: On the use of discriminant functions in taxonomy. Biometrics, 1962, 18:455-477.
128. Lugt, AV: Coherent optical processing. Proc IEEE, 1974, 62:1300-1318.
129. Mahalanobis, PC: On the generalized distance in statistics. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. (India), 1936, 2:49-55.
130. Mardia, KV, Kent, JT, and Bibby, JM: Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, London, 1979, 518.
131. Mardia, KV and Dryden, IL: The statistical analysis of shape data. Biometrika, 1989, 76:271-281.
132. Martin, R: Lehrbuch der Anthropologic G. Fischer. Stuttgart, 1928, 661.
133. Medalia, Al: Dynamic shape factors of particles. Powder Tech., 1970, 4:117-138.
134. Medawar, PB: Size, shape and age, in Essays on Growth and Form Presented to D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Le Gros Clark, WE and Medawar, PB, Eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1945, 157-187.
135. Medawar, PB: Transformation of shape. Proc Roy. Soc. (Lond) B, 1950, 137:474-479.
136. Moellering, H and Rayner, JN: The harmonic analysis of spatial shapes using dual axis Fourier shape analysis (DAFSA). Geograph. Anal., 1981, 13:64-77.
137. Moon, W, Lestrel, PE, Engstrom, C, and Devincenzo, JP: A quantitative approach for measuring Tx effects using functional appliance therapy: Fourier descriptors. J. Dent. Res., 1992, 71:593.
138. Mok, EC and Boyer, AL: Encoding patient contours using Fourier descriptors for computer treatment planning. Med. Phys., 1986, 13:413-415.
139. Mokhtarian, F and Mackworth, A: Scale-based description and recognition of planar curves and two-dimensional shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Int., 1986, PAMI-8:34-43.
140. Montanari, TJ: Continuous skeletons from digitized images. J. Assoc. Comp. Mach., 1969, 16:534-549.
141. Moss, ML and Young, RW: A functional approach to craniology. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1960, 18:281-292.
142. Moss, ML, Vilmann, H, Moss-Salentjin, L, Sen, K, Pucciarelli, HM, and Skalak, R: Studies on orthocephalization: Growth behavior of the rat skull in the period 13-49 days as described by the finite element method. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1987, 72:323-342.
143. Murphy, GF, Partin, AW, Maygarden, SJ, and Mohler, JL: Nuclear shape analysis for assessment of prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol., 1990, 143:1103-1107.
144. Nadler, M and Smith, EP: Pattern Recognition Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993, 588.
145. Nafe, R, Kaloutsi, V, Choritz, H, and Georgii, A: Elliptic Fourier analysis of megakaryocyte nuclei in chronic myeloproliferative disorders. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol., 1992, 14:391-397.
146. O’Higgins, P: Developments in cranial morphometries. Folia Primatol., 1989, 53:101-124.
147. O’Higgins, P and Williams, NW: An investigation into the use of Fourier coefficients in characterizing cranial shape in primates. J. Zool. Lond., 1987, 211:409-430.
148. O’Higgins, P and Johnson, DR: The quantitative description and comparison of biological forms. Crit. Rev. Anat. Sci., 1988, 1:149-170.
149. Ohtsuki, F, Uetake, T, Adachi, K, Lestrel, PE, and Hanihara, K: Fourier analysis of shape changes in the Japanese skull: occipital view. Okajimas. Folia. Anat. Japon, 1993a, 70:127-138.
150. Ohtsuki, F, Uetake, T, Adachi, K, Lestre, PE, and Hanihara, K: Fourier analysis of shape changes in the Japanese skull: vertical view. Forma, 1993b, 8:297-307.
151. O’Rourke, J and Badler, N: Decomposition of three-dimensional objects into spheres. IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Int., 1979, PAMI-L295-305.
152. Osman, A: A three dimensional analysis of the shape of the rabbit orbit: Fourier descriptors. MS thesis, Oral Biology, UCLA School of Dentistry, 1993, 102.
153. Ostrowski, K, Dziedzic-Goclawaska, A, Strojny, P, Grzesik, W, Kieler, J, Christensen, B, and Mareel, M: Fourier analysis of the cell shape of paired human urothelial cell lines of the same origin but of different grades of transformation. Histochemistry, 1986, 84:323-328.
154. Ourmazd, A, Taylor, DW, Bode, M, and Kim, Y: Quantifying the information content of lattice images. Science, 1989, 246:1571-1577.
155. Oxnard, CE: Form and Pattern in Human Evolution. The University of Chicago Press, 1973, 169-201.
156. Oxnard, CE: One biologists’s view of morphometries. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1978, 9:219-241.
157. Oxnard, CE: The analysis of form: without measurement and without computers. Am. Zool., 1980, 20:695-705.
158. Oxnard, CE: The association between cancellous architecture and loading in bone: an optical data analytical view. Physiologist, 1982, 25:Suppl:S37-S40.
159. Oxnard, CE and Buck, AM: Age and sex differences in cancellous patterns in human vertebral bodies: a matter of osteoporosis? Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., Suppl., 1990, 14:130.
160. Parnell, JN and Lestrel, PE: A computer program for fitting irregular two-dimensional forms. Comp. Prog. Biomed., 1977, 7:145-161.
161. Parks, JM: Cluster analysis applied to multivariate geologic problems. J. Geol., 1966, 74:703-715.
162. Pavlidis, T: A review of algorithms for shape analysis. Comp. Graph. Imag. Proc, 1978, 7:243-258.
163. Pearson, K: On the coefficient of racial likeness. Biometrika, 1926, 18:105-117.
164. Penrose, LS: Distance, size and shape. Ann. Eugen., 1954, 18:337-343.
165. Persoon, E and Fu, K: Shape discrimination using Fourier descriptors. IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. Mach. Int., 1977, PAMI-8:388-397.
166. Pizer, SM, Oliver, WR, and Bloomberg, SH: Hierarchical shape description via the multiresolution symmetric axis transform. IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Int., 1987, PAMI-9:505-511.
167. Power, PC and Pincus, HJ: Optical diffraction analysis of petrographic thin sections. Science, 1974, 186:234-239.
168. Ramirez, RW: The FFT. Fundamentals and Concepts. Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1985, 1-178.
169. Rao, CR: The utilization of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. (Ser. B), 1948, 10:159-203.
170. Ray, TS: Application of eigenshape analysis to second order leaf shape ontogeny in Syngonium podophyllum (Araceae), in Proc. Michigan Morphometric Workshop, Rohlf, FJ and Bookstein, FL, Eds., University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Pub. No. 2, 1990, 201-213.
171. Read, DW and Lestrel, PE: A comment upon the uses of homologous-point measures in systematics: a reply to Bookstein et al., Syst. Zool., 1986, 33:241-253.
172. Read, DW: From multivariate to qualitative measurement: representation of shape. Hum. Evol., 1990, 5:417-429.
173. Reeve, ECR and Huxley, JS: Some problems in the study of allometric growth, in Essays on Growth and Form Presented to D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Le Gros Clark, WE and Medawar, PB, Eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1945, 121-156.
174. Reyment, RA: Multivariate morphometries and analysis of shape. Math. Geol., 1985, 17:591-609.
175. Reyment, RA: Multidimensional Paleobiology. Pergamon Press, Oxford., 1991, 377.
176. Reyment, RA, Blackith, RE, and Campbell, NA: Multivariate Morphometries, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, NY, 1984, 233.
177. Ricco, R, De Benedictis, G, Giardina, C, Bufo, P, Resta, L, and Pesce Delfino, V: Morphometric analytical evaluators of lymphoid populations in noneoplastic lymph nodes. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol., 1985, 4:288-293.
178. Richards, OW and Kavanagh, AJ: The analysis of the growing form, in Essays on Growth and Form Presented to DArcy Wentworth Thompson. Le Gros Clark, WE and Medawar, PB, Eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1945, 188-230.
179. Richtsmeier, JT: Comparative study of normal, Crouzon and Apert craniofacial morphology using finite element scaling analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 1987, 74:473-493.
180. Richtsmeier, JT: Cranial growth in Apert syndrome as measured by finite element scaling analysis. Acta Anat., 1988, 133:50-56.
181. Richtsmeier, JT: Applications of finite-element scaling analysis in primatology. Folia Primatol., 1989, 53:50-64.
182. Richtsmeier, JT, Grauz, HM, Morris, GR, Marsh, JL, and Vannier, MW: Growth of the cranial base in craniosynostosis. Cleft. Pal. Cran. J., 1991, 28:55-67.
183. Richtsmeier, JT, Cheverud, JM, and Lele, S: Advances in anthropological morphometries. Ann. Rev. Anthropol., 1992, 21:283-305.
184. Rohlf, FJ: Relationships among eigenshape analysis, Fourier analysis and analysis of coordinates. Math. Geol., 1986, 18:845-854.
185. Rohlf, FJ: Morphometries. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1990a, 21:299-316.
186. Rohlf, FJ: Fitting curves to outlines, in Proc. Michigan Morphometric Workshop. Rohlf, FJ and Bookstein, FL, Eds., University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Pub. No. 2, 1990b, 167-177.
187. Rohlf, FJ: Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods, in Proc. Michigan Morphometric Workshop. Rohlf, FJ and Bookstein, FL, Eds., University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Pub. No 2, 1990c, 227-236.
188. Rohlf, FJ and Archie, JW: A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitos (Diptera: culicidae). Syst. Zool., 1984, 33:302-317.
189. Rohlf, FJ and Marcus, LF: A revolution in morphometries. Tree, 1993, 8:129-132.
190. Sarnat, BG: The orbit and eye: experiments on volume in young and adult rabbits. Acta Ophthalmol. Suppl., 1981, 147:1-43
191. Sarnat, BG and Shanedling, PD: Orbital growth after evisceration or enucleation without and with implants. Acta Anat. (Basel), 1972, 82:497-511.
192. Schwarcz, HP and Shane, KC: Measurement of particle shape by Fourier analysis. Sedimentol., 1969, 13:213-231.
193. Schweitzer, PN, Kaesler, RL and Lohmann, GP: Ontogeny and heterochrony in the ostracode Cavellina coreyell from the Lower Permian rocks in Kansas. Paleobiologist, 1986, 12:290-301.
194. Scott, GH: The value of outline processing in the biometry and systematics. Paleontologist, 1980, 23:757-768.
195. Simpson, GG: Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York, 1961, 247.
196. Sneath, PHA and Sokal, RR: Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973, 573.
197. Spivey, HR: Shell morphology in barnacles: quantification of shape and shape change in Balanus. J. Zool. (Lond.), 1988, 216:265-294.
198. Spoehr, KT and Lehmkuhle, SW: Visual Information Processing. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982, 298.
199. Sprent, P: The mathematics of size and shape. Biometrics, 1972, 28:23-37.
200. Steward, M: Computer image processing of electron micrographs of biological structures with helical symmetry. J. Elec. Micro. Tech., 1988, 9:325-358.
201. Strackee, J and Nagelkerke, NJ: On closing the Fourier descriptor representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Int., 1983, PAMI-5:660-661.
202. Straney, DO: Median axis methods in morphometries, in Proc. Michigan Morphometric Workshop. Rohlf, FJ and Bookstein, FL. Eds., University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Pub. No. 2, 1990, 179-200.
203. Strojny, P, Traczyk, Z, Rozycka, M, Bern, W, and Sawicki, W: Fourier analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic shape of blood lymphoid cells from healthy donors and chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol., 1987, 9:475-479.
204. Talbot, PA and Mulhall, H: The Physical Anthropology of Southern Nigeria. Cambridge University Press, NY, 1962, 127.
205. Thompson, DW: Morphology and mathematics. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1915, 50:857-895.
206. Thompson, DW: On Growth and Form, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1942, 1116.
207. Tolstov, GP: Fourier Series. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962, 336.
208. van Otterloo, PJ: A Contour-oriented Approach to Shape Analysis. Prentice-Hall, NY, 1991, 368.
209. Waters, JA: Quantification of shape by the use of Fourier analysis: the Mississippian blastoid genus Pentremites. Paleo-biologist, 1977, 3:288-299.
210. Webber, RL and Blum, H: Angular invariants in developing mandibles. Science, 1979, 206:689-691.
211. White, RJ and Prentice, HC: Comparison of shape description methods for biological outlines. In Classification and Related Methods in Data Analysis. Bock, HH, Ed., Elsevier Science Pub BV, North Holland, 1988, 395-402.
212. White, RJ, Prentice, HC, and Verwijst, T: Automated image acquisition and morphometric description, Can. J. Bot., 1988, 66:450-459.
213. Xu, J and Yang, Y-H: Generalized multidimensional orthogonal polynomials with applications to shape analysis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Int., 1990, 12:906-913.
214. Zahn, CT and Roskies, RZ: Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Trans. Comp., 1972, C-21:269-281.
215. Zuckerman, S: The pattern of change in size and shape. Proc. Roy. Soc. (Lond) B, 1950, 137:433-442.