Optimal survey design for big geodata

Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 84th Annual Meeting SEG 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 127-131

  Coles, Darrell ^a   Prange, Michael ^a   Djikpesse, Hugues ^a  

^a SCHLUMBERGER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING; SURVEYS;

ACQUISITION GEOMETRY; COMPUTATION TIME; DIMENSION REDUCTION METHOD; MEMORY REQUIREMENTS; OPTIMUM SELECTION; REDUCTION METHOD; REDUCTION STRATEGY; SOURCE-RECEIVER PAIRS;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

EID: 85051541635     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/segam2014-0224.1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Atkinson, A. N., Donev, and R. D. Tobias, 2007, Optimum experimental designs: Oxford University Press.
2. Djikpesse, H., M. Khodja, M. D. Prange, S. Duchenne, and H. Menkiti. 2012, Bayesian survey design to optimize resolution in waveform inversion: Geophysics, 77, no. 2, R81-R93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0143.1.
3. Fedorov, V. V., and P. Hackl, 1997, Model-oriented design of experiments:Springer.
4. Golub, G. H., and C. F. Van Loan, 1996, Matrix computations, 3rd ed.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Gu, Ming, and S. C. Eisenstat, 1996, Efficient algorithms for computing a strong rank-revealing QR factorization: SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 17, no. 4, 848-869.
6. Habashy, T. M., A. Abubakar, G. Pan, and A. Belani, 2011, Source-receiver compression scheme for full-waveform seismic inversion:Geophysics, 76, no. 4, R95-R108.
7. Herrmann, F. J., 2010, Randomized sampling and sparsity: Getting more information from fewer samples: Geophysics, 75, no. 6, WB173-WB187.
8. Khodja, M. R., M. D. Prange, and H. A. Djikpesse, 2010, Guided Bayesian optimal experimental design: Inverse Problems, 26, no. 5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/26/5/055008.
9. Krebs, J. R., J. E. Anderson, D. Hinkley, R. Neelamani, S. Lee, A. Baumstein, and M.-D. Lacasse, 2009, Fast full-wavefield seismic inversion using encoded sources: Geophysics, 74, no. 6, WCC77-WCC188.
10. Maurer, H., A. Curtis, and D. Boerner, 2010, Recent advances in optimized geophysical survey design: Geophysics, 75, no. 5, 75A177-75A194.
11. Tarantola, A., 2005, Inverse problem theory: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
12. WesternGeco, 2013, Dual coil shooting multivessel full-azimuth acquisition: Schlumberger, accessed 28 May 2014, http://www.slb.com/services/westerngeco/services/marine/techniques_enabled/dualcoilshooting.