Animal models for computing and communications: Past approaches and future challenges

Bio-Inspired Computing and Networking

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 3-18

  Bales, Karen L ^a   Kitzmann, Carolyn D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

ANIMAL MODEL; FUTURE CHALLENGES;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 85051446663     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. E.S. Morton, Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds, Am. Nat., 109, 17 (1975).
2. R.H. Wiley and D.G. Richards, Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 3, 69 (1978).
3. E.S. Morton, On the occurrence and significance of motivation-structural rules in some bird and mammal sounds, Am. Nat., 111, 855 (1977).
4. J.W. Bradbury and S.L. Vehrencamp, Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA, 1998).
5. H. Brumm, K. Voss, I. Köllmer, and D. Todt, Acoustic communication in noise: Regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey, J. Exp. Biol., 207, 443 (2004).
6. S.E.R. Egnor and M.D. Hauser, A paradox in the evolution of primate vocal learning, Trends Neurosci., 27, 649 (2004).
7. G.L. Patricelli and J.L. Blickley, Avian communication in urban noise: Causes and consequences of vocal adjustment, Auk, 123, 639 (2006).
8. E. Nevo, G. Heth, and H. Pratt, Seismic communication in a blind subterranean mammal: A major somatosensory mechanism in adaptive evolution underground, Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA, 88, 1256 (1991).
9. B.R. Stein, Morphology of Subterranean Rodents, in Life Underground: The Biology of Subterranean Rodents, Eds. E.A. Lacey, J.L. Patton and G.N. Cameron (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2000), p. 19.
10. G. Francescoli, Sensory capabilities and communication in subterranean rodents, in Life Underground: The Biology of Subterranean Rodents, Eds. E.A. Lacey, J.L. Patton, and G.N. Cameron (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2000), p. 111.
11. G.W. Uetz and J.A. Roberts, Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: Insights from video/audio playback studies, Brain, Behav. Evolut., 59, 222 (2002).
12. S.R. Partan and P. Marler, Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals, Am. Nat., 166, 231 (2005).
13. N. Ay, J. Flack, and D.C. Krakauer, Robustness and complexity co-constructed in multimodal signaling networks, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 362, 441 (2007).
14. M. Moynihan, Communication in the Titi monkey, Callicebus, J. Zool. Soc. Lond., 150, 77 (1966).
15. J.G. Robinson, An analysis of the organization of vocal communication in the titi monkey, Callicebus moloch, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 49, 381 (1979).
16. J.G. Robinson, Vocal regulation of inter- and intragroup spacing during boundary encounters in the Titi monkey, Callicebus moloch, Primates, 22, 161 (1981).
17. P. Bartlett and P.J.B. Slater, The effect of new recruits on the flock specific call of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), Ethol. Ecol. Evol., 11, 139 (1999).
18. J.W. Boughman, Vocal learning by greater spear-nosed bats, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 265, 227 (1998).
19. M.L. Moravec, G.F. Striedter, and N.T. Burley, Assortative pairing based on contact call similarity in budgerigars, melopsittacus undulates, Ethol, 112, 1108 (2006).
20. C.R. Kube and H. Zhang, Collective Robotics: From Social Insects to Robots, Adapt. Behav, 2, 2 (1993).
21. K.-J. Kim and S.-B. Cho, A comprehensive overview of the applications of artificial life, Artif. Life, 12, 153 (2006).
22. A.E. Hirsch and D.M. Gordon, Distributed problem solving in social insects, Ann. Math. Arti. Intell., 31, 199 (2001).
23. Z. Ma and A.W. Krings, Insect sensory systems inspired computing and communications, Ad Hoc Netw., 7, 742 (2009).
24. F. Dressler, Benefits ofbio-inspired technologies for networked embedded systems: An overview, Dagstuhl Sem. Proc., Schloss Dagstuhl, Wadern, Germany, January (2006).
25. E.O. Wilson, The Insect Societies (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1971).
26. A.F.G. Bourke and N.R. Franks, Social Evolution in Ants (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1995).
27. B. Danforth, Bees, Curr. Biol., 17, R156 (2007).
28. M.P. Schwarz, M.H. Richards, and B.N. Danforth, Changing paradigms in insect social evolution: Insights from halictine and allodapine bees, Ann. Rev. Entomol., 52, 127 (2007).
29. R.R. Cazangi, F.J. Von Zuben, and M.F. Figueredo, Autonomous navigation system applied to collective robotics with ant-inspired communication, GECCO '05, 2005.
30. S.W. Pacala, D.M. Gordon, and H.C.J. Godfray, Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation, Evol. Ecol., 10, 127 (1996).
31. H.M. Pereira and D.M. Gordon, A trade-off in task allocation between sensitivity to the environment and response time, J. Theor. Biol., 208, 165 (2001).
32. C.R. Kube and E. Bonabeau, Cooperative transport by ants and robots, Robot. Auton. Syst., 30, 85 (2000).
33. M.J.B. Krieger, J.-B. Billeter, and L. Keller, Ant-like task allocation and recruitment in cooperative robots, Nature, 406, 992 (2000).
34. R.C. Arkin, K. Ali, A. Weitzenfeld, and F. Cervantes-Perez, Behavioral models of the praying mantis as a basis for robotic behavior, J. Robot. Auton. Syst., 32, 39 (2000).
35. A. Stoytchev and R.C. Arkin, Combining deliberation, reactivity, and motivation in the context of a behavior-based robot architecture, IEEE (2001).
36. A.J.W. Ward, D.J.T. Sumpter, I.D. Couzin, P.J.B. Hart, and J. Krause, Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals, PNAS, 105, 6948 (2008).
37. A. Weitzenfeld, A prey catching and predator avoidance neural-schema architecture for single and multiple robots, J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 51, 203 (2008).
38. A. Markham and A. Wilkinson, The adaptive social hierarchy: A self organizing network based on naturally occurring structures, IEEE (2006).
39. D.J. Melnick and M.C. Pearl, Cercopithecines in multimale groups: Genetic diversity and population structure, in Primate Societies, Eds. B.B. Smuts, D.L. Cheney, R.M. Seyfarth, R.W. Wrangham, and T.T. Struhsaker (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1987), p. 121.
40. C.P. van Schaik, S.A. Pandit, and E.R. Vogel, A model for within-group coalitionary aggression among males, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 57, 101 (2004).
41. J.C. Ray and R.M. Sapolsky, Styles of male social behavior and their endocrine correlates among high-ranking wild baboons, Am. J. Primatol., 28, 231 (1992).
42. J.J. Bryson, Where should complexity go? Cooperation in complex agents with minimal communication, WRAC2002, 2564, 2003.
43. I.D. Couzin, J. Krause, N.R. Franks, and S.A. Levin, Effective leadership and decisionmaking in animal groups on the move, Nature, 433, 513 (2005).
44. J.C. Schank, Beyond reductionism: Refocusing on the individual with individual-based modeling, Complexity, 6, 33 (2001).
45. J.J. Bryson, Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behavior, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 362, 1685 (2007).
46. W.A. Mason, Social organization of the South American monkey, Callicebus moloch: A preliminary report, Tulane Stud. Zool., 13, 23 (1966).
47. J.D. Baldwin and J.I. Baldwin, Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri) in natural habitats in Panama, Colombia, Brazil, and Peru, Primates, 12, 45 (1971).
48. C.A. Chapman, Ecological constraints on group size in three species of neotropical primates, Folia Primat., 55, 1 (1990).
49. M.M. Symington, Fission-fusion social organization in Ateles and Pan, Int. J. Primat., 11, 47 (1990).
50. G. Ramos-Fernández, Vocal communication in a fission-fusion society: Do spider monkeys stay in touch with close associates?, Int. J. Primat., 26, 1077 (2005).
51. K. Smith, S.C. Alberts, and J. Altmann, Wild female baboons bias their social behaviour towards paternal half-sisters, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270, 503 (2003).
52. S.D. Gosling and O.P. John, Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals: A crossspecies review, Curr. Dir. Psych. Sci., 8, 69 (1999).
53. S.D. Gosling, From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?, Psych. Bull., 127, 45 (2001).
54. J.P. Capitanio, Personality dimensions in adult male rhesus macaques: Prediction of behaviors across time and situation, Am. J. Primat., 47, 229 (1999).
55. J.P. CapitanioandK.F. Widaman, Confirmatory factor analysis of personality structure in adult male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), Am J. Primat., 65, 289 (2005).
56. J.P. Capitanio, S.P. Mendoza, and S. Baroncelli, The relationship of personality dimensions in adult male rhesus macaques to progression ofsimian immunodeficiency virus disease, Brain Behav. Immun., 13, 138 (1999).
57. N. Maninger, J.P. Capitanio, S.P. Mendoza, and W.A. Mason, Personality influences tetanus-specific antibody response in adult male rhesus macaques after removal from natal group and housing relocation, Am. J. Primat., 61, 78 (2003).
58. B. Hölldobler, Multimodal signals in ant communication, J. Comp. Physiol. A, 184, 129 (1999).
59. C.B. Jones and T.E. VanCantfort, Multimodal communication by male mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in sexual contexts: A descriptive analysis, Folia Primat., 78, 166 (2007).
60. E.A. Cartmill and R.W. Byrne, Orangutans Modify Their Gestural Signaling According to Their Audience's Comprehension, Curr. Biol., 17, 1345 (2007).
61. P.K. McGregor and T.M. Peake, Communication networks: Social environments for receiving and signalling behavior, Acta Ethol., 2, 71 (2000).
62. C.T. Snowdon and A. Hodun, Acoustic adaptations in pygmy marmoset contact calls: Locational cues vary with distances between conspecifics, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 9, 295 (1981).
63. J.A. Endler, Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes, Env. Biol. Fishes, 9, 173 (1983).