Anti-terrorism laws and slippery slopes: A reply to waddington

Policing and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 405-414

  Haubrich, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050846843     PISSN: 10439463     EISSN: 14772728     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10439460600973719     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Haubrich, D., 2003. “September 11th, anti-terrorism laws and civil liberties: Britain, France and Germany compared”. Government and Opposition, 38 (1): 3–31.
2. Haubrich, D., (2005), “Civil liberties in emergencies” in Governments of the World: A Global Guide to Citizens’ Rights and Responsibilities, N., Tate et al. (eds), MacMillan Reference, Farmington Hills, MA.
3. Home Office (2006a), “Arrests and charges made under the Terrorism Act 2000”. Available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/security/terrorism-and-the-law/terrorism-act/ (accessed March 2006).
4. Home Office (2006b), “Proposed legislation”. Available online at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/security/terrorism-and-the-law/proposed-legislation/ (accessed March 2006).
5. Leone, R.C., & Anrig, G. (eds) (2003), The War on Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism, Century Foundation, New York.
6. New York University Center on Law and Security (2006), Terrorist Trial Report Card: United Kingdom. Available online at: http://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/lawsecurity/publications/index.html (accessed May 2006).
7. The Scotsman (2005), “Over 600 held under Terror Act at Labour conference”. Available online at: http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm? id=2028602005 (accessed October 2005).
8. Waddington, P.A.J., 2005. “Slippery slopes and civil libertarian pessimism”. Policing & Society, 15 (3): 353–375.