The EU's response to turkey's membership application: not just a weighing of costs and benefits

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 481-502

  Nugent, Neill ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

European Union enlargement; rationalism; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050846731     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330701502480     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahrens, J., Hoen, H.W., and Ohr, R., 2005. Deepening Integration in an Enlarged EU: A Club-theoretical Perspective. Journal of European Integration, 27(4): 417–39.
2. Borras, S., and Jacobson, K., 2004. The Open Method of Co-ordination and New Governance Patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2): 185–208.
3. Bulmer, S., and Lequesne, C., 2005. “ The EU and its Member States: An Overview: ”. In The Member States of the European Union, Edited by: Bulmer, S., and Lequesne, C., 1–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Commission of the European Communities. 6 October 2004a. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Recommendation of the European Commission on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession 6 October, COM (2004) 656 final
5. Commission of the European Communities. 6 October 2004b. Commission Staff Working Document: Issues Arising from Turkey's Membership Perspective 6 October, COM (2004) 656 final
6. Commission of the European Communities. 6 October 2004c. Turkey 2005 Progress Report 6 October, COM (2004) 656 final
7. Commission of the European Communities. 16 March 2005a. Communication from the Commission — Green Paper: Confronting Demographic Change: A New Solidarity Between the Generations 16 March, COM (2005) 94 final
8. Commission of the European Communities. 9 November 2005b. Communication from the Commission: 2005 Enlargement Strategy Paper 9 November, COM (2005) 561
9. Commission of the European Communities. 9 November 2005c. Turkey 2005 Progress Report 9 November, COM (2005) 561 final
10. Commission of the European Communities. 2005d. Negotiating Framework for Turkey Available at http://www.europa.eu.int/comm./enlargement/docs/pdf/st20002_en05_TR_framework.pdf (accessed 30 November 2006)
11. European Council. 1993. Conclusions of the Presidency: Copenhagen, 21–22 June, Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
12. European Council. 1995. Presidency Conclusions: Madrid 15–16 December, Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
13. European Council. 1997. Presidency Conclusions: Copenhagen 12–13 December 1997, Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
14. European Council. 1999. Presidency Conclusions: Helsinki, 10–11 December, Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
15. European Council. 2001. Presidency Conclusions: Laeken, 14–15 December, Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
16. European Council. 2002. Presidency Conclusions: Copenhagen 12–13 December 2002, Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
17. European Council. 2004. Presidency Conclusions: Brussels, 16–17 December, Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council.
18. European Parliament. 13 September 2006. Report on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession, 13 September, Brussels: European Parliament. A6-0269/2006
19. Grabbe, H., 2001. How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6): 1013–1031.
20. Grabbe, H., 2004. When Negotiations Begin: The Next Phase in EU–Turkey Relations, London: Centre For European Reform.
21. Grabbe, H., 2005. The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Hodson, D., and Maher, I., 2001. The Open Method as a New Mode of Governance: The Case of Soft Economic Policy Co-ordination. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4): 719–746.
23. Junge, K., 2000. Does Differentiation Work? An Analysis of Different Methods of European Integration, University of Birmingham. PhD Thesis
24. Ludlow, P., 2005. A View From Brussels: Dealing With Turkey, Brussels: Eurocomment.
25. Moravcsik, A., 1993. Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4): 473–524.
26. Moravcsik, A., 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27. Müftüler-Bac, M., 2005. Turkey's Political Reforms and the Impact of the European Union. South European Politics and Society, 10(1): 16–30.
28. Olsen, J.P., 2002. The Many Faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5): 921–952.
29. Olsen, J.P., 2003. “ Europeanization ”. In European Union Politics, Edited by: Cini, M., 1–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Radaelli, C.M., 2000. Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change Available at http://www.eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-008.htm (accessed 15 October 2006)
31. Schimmelfennig, F., 2005a. “ The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union ”. In The Politics of European Union Enlargement; Theoretical Approaches, Edited by: Schimmelfennig, F., and Sedelmeier, U., 142–171. London: Routledge. [This is an amended version of an article that appeared in International Organization, 55(1), pp.47–80.]
32. Schimmelfennig, F., 2005b. “ Liberal Community and Enlargement: An Event History Analysis ”. In The Politics of European Union Enlargement: Theoretical Approaches, Edited by: Schimmelfennig, F., and Sedelmeier, U., 172–197. London: Routledge. [This is a revised version of an article that appeared in Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), pp.598–626.]
33. Schimmelfennig, F., and Sedelmeier, U., 2006. “ The Study of EU Enlargement: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Findings ”. In Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies, Edited by: Cini, M., and Bourne, A., 96–116. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Sedelmeier, U., 2005. Constructing the Path to Eastern Enlargement: The Uneven Policy Impact of EU Identity, Manchester: Manchester University Press.