Do ‘virtual wards’ reduce rates of unplanned hospital admissions, and at what cost? A research protocol using propensity matched controls

International Journal of Integrated Care

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Lewis, Geraint ^a   Bardsley, Martin ^a   Vaithianathan, Rhema ^b   Steventon, Adam ^a   Georghiou, Theo ^a   Billings, John ^c   Dixon, Jennifer ^a  

^a The Nuffield Trust   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical protocols; Delivery of health care; Evaluation studies; Integrated

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050799457     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15684156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5334/ijic.654     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Blunt I, Bardsley M, Dixon J. Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004–2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency? London: The Nuffield Trust; 2010. [cited 2011 23 May]. Available from: http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/publications/detail.aspx?id=145&PRid=714.
2. Dixon J. Making progress on efficiency in the NHS in England: options for system reform. London: The Nuffield Trust; 2010.
3. Department of Health UK. Raising the profile of long-term conditions care: a compendium of information. London: Department of Health; 2008.
4. Billings J, Mijanovich T. Improving the management of care for high-cost Medicaid patients. Health Affairs 2007;26(6):1643– 54.
5. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. Medicare health support, overview. US: Department for health and human services; 2008. [webpage on the internet] [cited 2009 7 November]. Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/CCIP/.
6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare coordinated care demonstration. US: Department for health and human services; 2008. [webpage on the internet] [cited on 2009 7 November]. Available from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/Demo-ProjectsEvalRpts/downloads/CC_Fact_Sheet.pdf.
7. Gravelle H, Dusheiko M, Sheaff R, Sargent P, Boaden R, Pickard S, et al. Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data. British Medical Journal 2007;334:31.
8. Dusheiko M, Gravelle H, Parker S. Follow-up of people aged 65 and over with a history of emergency admissions: analysis of routine admissions data. British Medical Journal 2005;330(7486):289–92.
9. Curry N, Billings J, Darin B, Dixon J, Williams M, Wennberg D. Predictive risk project literature review. London: King’s Fund; 2005.
10. Billings J, Dixon J, Mijanovich T, Wennberg D. Case finding for patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients. British Medical Journal 2006;333(7563):327.
11. Wennberg D, Siegel M, Darin B, Filipova N, Russell R, Kenney L, et al. Combined predictive model: final report and technical documentation. London: Health Dialog/King’s Fund/New York University; 2006. [cited on 2011 8 June]. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/research/projects/predicting_and_reducing_readmission_to_hospital/#resources.
12. Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications—a discussion paper. International Journal of Integrated Care [serial online] 2002 Nov 14;2. [cited 2011 May 23]. Available from: http://www.ijic.org. URN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-100309.
13. Leutz W. Five laws for integrating medical and social services: lessons from the United States and the United Kingdom. The Millbank Quarterly 1999;77(1):77–100.
14. Glendinning C. Breaking down barriers: integrating health and care services for older people in England. Health Policy 2002;65:139–51.
15. Rosen R, Ham C. Integrated care: lessons from evidence and experience. London: The Nuffield Trust; 2008.
16. Ramsay A, Fulop N. The Evidence Base for Integrated Care. Summary of evidence prepared for the Department of Health. London: Department of Health; 2008.
17. Tollen L. Physician organization in relation to quality and efficiency of care: a synthesis of recent literature. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2008.
18. Lewis GH. Case study: virtual wards at Croydon Primary Care Trust. London: King’s Fund; 2006. [document on the internet]. [cited 2011 May 15]. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/search_clicks.rm?id=6746&destinationtype=2&instanceid =349684.
19. Lewis G. Predictive modeling in action: How ‘virtual wards’ help high-risk patients receive hospital care at home. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2010.
20. National Primary Care Development Centre (NPCDC). Evercare evaluation interim report: implications to supporting people with long-term conditions. UK: NPCDC; 2005. Available from: http://www.medicine.manchester.ac.uk/primarycare/npcrdc-archive/Publications/evercare%20report1.pdf.
21. Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M, Hewitt M, Robinson J, Blair M, et al. Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal 2001;323:719–25.
22. Johri M, Beland F, Bergman H. International experiments in integrated care for the elderly: a synthesis of the evidence. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2003;18:222–35.
23. Hutt R, Rosen R, McCauley J. Case managing long-term conditions. London: King’s Fund; 2004. [cited 2011 May 23]. Available from: www.kingsfund.org.uk/document.rm?id=90.
24. Singh D. Transforming chronic care: evidence about improving care for people with long-term conditions. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham; 2005. Available from: http://www.download.bham.ac.uk/hsmc/pdf/transforming_chronic_care.pdf.
25. Supporting people with long-term conditions. London: Department of Health; 2007.
26. Sargent P, Boaden R, Roland M. How many patients can community matrons successfully case manage? Journal of Nursing Management 2008;16(1):1–95.
27. Williams A, Cooper B. Determining caseloads in the community of care of frail older people with chronic illness. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008;17(5a):60–6.
28. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70(1):41–55.
29. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician 1985;39(1):33–8.
30. Rubin D. For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. The Annals of Applied Statistics 2008;2(3):808–40.
31. Hansen B. The prognostic analogue of the propensity score. Biometrika 2008;95(2):481–8.
32. Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensi-ty-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine 2009;28:3083–107.
33. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998.
34. Personal social services research unit. Nurses and doctors. Units cost of health and social care 2009;112–23. [Document on the internet]. [cited 2011 May 25]. Available from: http://www.pssru.ac.uk/pdf/uc/uc2009/uc2009_s08.pdf.
35. Personal social services research unit. List of useful sources. Units cost of health and social care 2009;199–200. [Document on the internet]. [cited 2011 May 25]. Available from: http://www.pssru.ac.uk/pdf/uc/uc2009/uc2009_listusefulsources.pdf.