A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities

Nature Communications

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Claw, Katrina G ^a   Anderson, Matthew Z ^b   Begay, Rene L ^c   Tsosie, Krystal S ^d,e   Fox, Keolu ^f   Garrison, Nanibaa’ A ^g,h   Bader, Alyssa C ⁱ   Bardill, Jessica ^j   Bolnick, Deborah A ^k   Brooks, Jada ^l   Cordova, Anna ^m   Malhi, Ripan S ⁱ   Nakatsuka, Nathan ⁿ   Neller, Angela ^o   Raff, Jennifer A ^p   Singson, Jamie ⁱ   TallBear, Kim ^q   Vargas, Tada ^r   Yracheta, Joseph M ^s,t  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Turtle Mountain Community College   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g SEATTLE CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^j Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

ⁿ HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^o Wanapum Heritage Center   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^r Oglala Lakota College   (United States)

^s MISSOURI BREAKS INDUSTRIES RESEARCH INC   (United States)

^t Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASE TREATMENT; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; OPTIMIZATION; RESEARCH WORK;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAPACITY BUILDING; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; COOPERATION; CULTURAL COMPETENCE; CULTURAL VALUE; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INDIGENOUS PEOPLE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH TRANSPARENCY; REVIEW; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; ETHICS; GENETICS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; INDIGENOUS HEALTH CARE; POPULATION GROUP; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARDS;

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; CULTURAL COMPETENCY; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENOMICS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH SERVICES, INDIGENOUS; HUMANS; POPULATION GROUPS;

EID: 85050790273     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Popejoy, A. B. & Fullerton, S. M. Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature 538, 161–164 (2016)
2. Jaja, C., Burke, W., Thummel, K., Edwards, K. & Veenstra, D. L. Cytochrome p450 enzyme polymorphism frequency in indigenous and native american populations: a systematic review. Community Genet. 11, 141–149 (2008)
3. Chen, M. S. Jr., Lara, P. N., Dang, J. H., Paterniti, D. A. & Kelly, K. Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials. Cancer 120, 1091–1096 (2014)
4. Jacobs-Wingo, J. L. et al. Causes and disparities in death rates among urban American Indian and Alaska Native populations, 1999-2009. Am. J. Public Health 106, 906–914 (2016)
5. Adekoya, N., Truman, B. & Landen, M., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Incidence of notifiable diseases among American Indians/Alaska Natives—United States, 2007-2011. Mmwr. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 64, 16–19 (2015)
6. Gottesman, O. et al. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future. Genet. Med. 15, 761–771 (2013)
7. Green, R. C. et al. Clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium: accelerating evidence-based practice of genomic medicine. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 1051–1066 (2016)
8. International HapMap Consortium, Frazer, K. A. et al. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449, 851–861 (2007)
9. Bustamante, C. D., Burchard, E. G. & De la Vega, F. M. Genomics for the world. Nature 475, 163–165 (2011)
10. West, K. M., Blacksher, E. & Burke, W. Genomics, health disparities, and missed opportunities for the nation’s research agenda. JAMA 317, 1831–1832 (2017)
11. Mello, M. M. & Wolf, L. E. The Havasupai Indian tribe case–lessons for research involving stored biologic samples. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 204–207 (2010)
12. Bowekaty, M. B. & Davis, D. S. Cultural issues in genetic research with American Indian and Alaskan Native people. IRB 25, 12–15 (2003)
13. Dukepoo, F. C. Genetic services in the new era: Native American perspectives. Community Genet. 1, 130–133 (1998)
14. Dodson, M. & Williamson, R. Indigenous peoples and the morality of the Human Genome Diversity Project. J. Med. Ethics 25, 204–208 (1999)
15. Greely, H. T. Human genome diversity: what about the other human genome project? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 222–227 (2001)
16. TallBear, K. Narratives of race and indigeneity in the Genographic Project. J. Law Med. Ethics 35, 412–424 (2007)
17. Havasupai Tribe of Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of Regents and Therese Ann Markow. 2008: Nos. 1 CA-CV 07-0454, 1 CA-CV 07-0801
18. Sterling, R. L. Genetic research among the Havasupai–a cautionary tale. Virtual Mentor. 13, 113–117 (2011)
19. Harmon, A. Indian Tribe Wins Fight to Limit Research of Its DNA. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/us/22dna.html (April 22, 2010)
20. Garrison, N. A. & Cho, M. K. Awareness and acceptable practices: IRB and researcher reflections on the Havasupai Lawsuit. AJOB Prim. Res. 4, 55–63 (2013)
21. Blumenthal, D. S. Is community-based participatory research possible? Am. J. Prev. Med. 40, 386–389 (2011)
22. Skinner, H. G. et al. Using community-based participatory research principles to develop more understandable recruitment and informed consent documents in genomic research. PLoS ONE 10, e0125466 (2015)
23. Smith, L. T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (Zed Books, London and New York; Otago Press, Dunedin; 1999)
24. Schuster, S. C. et al. Complete Khoisan and Bantu genomes from southern Africa. Nature 463, 943–947 (2010)
25. Nurse, G. T. et al. A reassessment of the HL-A system in Khoisan populations of South West Africa. Tissue Antigens 5, 402–414 (1975)
26. Jenkins, T., Lane, A. B., Nurse, G. T. & Tanaka, J. Sero-genetic studies on the G/wi and G//ana San of Botswana. Hum. Hered. 25, 318–328 (1975)
27. South African San Institute 2017. San Code of Research Ethics. (2017)
28. Nordling, L. San People of Africa Draft Code of Ethics for Researchers. 10.1126/science.aal0933 (2017)
29. Chennells, R. & Steenkamp, A. In: Ethics Dumping: Case Studies from North-South Research Collaborations. (eds Schroeder D., Cook J., Hirsch F., Fenet S. & Muthuswamy V.) 15–22 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018)
30. Hudson, M. et al. Te Mata Ira: Guidelines for Genomic Research with Māori (Te Mata Hautū Taketake-Māori & Indigenous Governance Centre, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2016)
31. A Welcome Framework for Research in Africa. Nature. 556, 274 (2018)
32. Friedrich, M. Ethical guidelines for genomic research in Africa. JAMA 319, 2371 (2018)
33. Reardon, S. Navajo Nation reconsiders ban on genetic research. Nature 550, 165–166 (2017)
34. Jacobs, B. et al. Bridging the divide between genomic science and indigenous peoples. J. Law Med. Ethics 38, 684–696 (2010)
35. Malhi, R. S. & Bader, A. Engaging Native Americans in genomics research. Am. Anthropol. 117, 743–744 (2015)
36. Office of Human Research Protections. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register 82, 7149-7274 (2017)
37. Smith, C. E. et al. Using genetic technologies to reduce, rather than widen, health disparities. Health Aff. 35, 1367–1373 (2016)
38. Reardon, S. US tailored-medicine project aims for ethnic balance. Nature 523, 391–392 (2015)
39. Kalt, J. P. & Singer, J. W. Myths and Realities of Tribal Sovereignty: The Law and Economics of Indian Self-Rule. KSG Faculty Research Working Paper RWP04-016 (Harvard University, 2004)
40. Dombrowski, K. Forgotten tribes: Unrecognized Indians and the federal acknowledgment process. Mark Edwin Miller. J. Anthropol. Res. 61, 105–107 (2005)
41. Kehaulani, K. J. Precarious positions: Native Hawaiians and US federal recognition. The Contemporary Pacific 17, 1–27 (2005)
42. Hull, S. C. & Wilson (Diné), D. R. Beyond Belmont: Ensuring respect for AI/AN communities through tribal IRBs, laws, and policies. Am. J. Bioeth. 17, 60–62 (2017)
43. Kelley, A., Belcourt-Dittloff, A., Belcourt, C. & Belcourt, G. Research ethics and indigenous communities. Am. J. Public Health 103, 2146–2152 (2013)
44. James, R. et al. Exploring pathways to trust: a tribal perspective on data sharing. Genet. Med. 16, 820–826 (2014)
45. Burhansstipanov, L., Christopher, S. & Schumacher, S. A. Lessons learned from community-based participatory research in Indian country. Cancer Control 12, 70–76 (2005)
46. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A. & Becker, A. B. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 19, 173–202 (1998)
47. Dankwa-Mullan, I. et al. The science of eliminating health disparities: summary and analysis of the NIH summit recommendations. Am. J. Public Health 100, S12–S18 (2010)
48. Woodahl, E. L. et al. Pharmacogenetic research in partnership with American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Pharmacogenomics 15, 1235–1241 (2014)
49. Boyer, B. B. et al. Building a community-based participatory research center to investigate obesity and diabetes in Alaska Natives. Int. J. Circumpolar. Health 64, 281–290 (2005)
50. Burhansstipanov, L., Bemis, L., Dignan, M. & Dukepoo, F. Development of a genetics education workshop curriculum for Native American college and university students. Genetics 158, 941–948 (2001)
51. Sahota, P. C. Body fragmentation: Native American community members’ views on specimen disposition in biomedical/genetics research. AJOB Empir. Bioeth. 5, 19–30 (2014)
52. Elliott, A. J. et al. Fostering social determinants of health transdisciplinary research: The Collaborative Research Center for American Indian Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 13, ijerph13010024 (2015)
53. Pearson, C. R., Parker, M., Zhou, C. Donald, C., & Fisher, C. B. A culturally tailored research ethics training curriculum for American Indian and Alaska Native communities: a randomized comparison trial. Crit. Public Health https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1434482 (2018)
54. Giacomini, K. M. et al. The pharmacogenetics research network: from SNP discovery to clinical drug response. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 81, 328–345 (2007)
55. Boyer, B. B. et al. Ethical issues in developing pharmacogenetic research partnerships with American Indigenous communities. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 89, 343–345 (2011)
56. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17-310 (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2017)
57. James, R., Starks, H., Segrest, V. A. & Burke, W. From leaky pipeline to irrigation system: minority education through the lens of community-based participatory research. Prog. Community Health Partnersh. 6, 471–479 (2012)
58. Lee, E. T. et al. The Strong Heart Study. A study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians: design and methods. Am. J. Epidemiol. 132, 1141–1155 (1990)
59. North, K. E. et al. Evidence for distinct genetic effects on obesity and lipid-related CVD risk factors in diabetic compared to nondiabetic American Indians: the Strong Heart Family Study. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 19, 140–147 (2003)
60. North, K. E. et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to cardiovascular disease risk in American Indians: the strong heart family study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 157, 303–314 (2003)
61. North, K. E. et al. Evidence for genetic factors underlying the insulin resistance syndrome in American Indians. Obes. Res. 11, 1444–1448 (2003)
62. Sambo, B. H. The Strong Heart Study: interaction with and benefit to American Indian communities. Am. J. Med. Sci. 322, 284–287 (2001)
63. Cueva, M., Kuhnley, R., Revels, L., Schoenberg, N. E. & Dignan, M. Digital storytelling: a tool for health promotion and cancer awareness in rural Alaskan communities. Int. J. Circumpolar. Health 74, 28781 (2015)
64. Bliss, S. J. et al. Invasive pneumococcal disease among White Mountain Apache adults, 1991-2005. Arch. Intern. Med. 168, 749–755 (2008)
65. Hurtado, S., White-Lewis, D. & Norris, K. Advancing inclusive science and systemic change: the convergence of national aims and institutional goals in implementing and assessing biomedical science training. BMC Proc. 11, 17 (2017)
66. James, S. M. & Singer, S. R. From the NSF: The National Science Foundation’s investments in broadening participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education through research and capacity building. CBE Life Sci. Educ. Fall. 15, fe7 (2016)