Systemic conditions and security cooperation: Explaining the persistence of the nuclear non-proliferation regime

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 135-154

  Paul, T V ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050786487     PISSN: 09557571     EISSN: 1474449X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0955757032000075753     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Chafetz, G., 1993. "The End of the Cold War and the Future of Nuclear Proliferation: An Alternative to the Neorealist Perspective'. Security Studies, 2(3-4): 127–58.
2. Cox, R. W., 1992. “ Towards a Post-hegemonic Conceptualization of World Order: Reflections on the Relevancy of Ibn Khaldun' ”. In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, Edited by: Rosenau, J. N., and Czempiel, E.-O., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Davis, Z. S., 1993. The Realist Nuclear Regime'. Security Studies, 2(3-4): 79–99.
4. Finnemore, M., 1996. National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5. Fischer, D. A., and Rauf, T., The Politics of the 1995 Conference on the Review and Extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty'. Monterey, California. Monterey Institute of International Studies.
6. Goldman, E., 1994. Sunken Treaties: Naval Arms Control between the War, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
7. Greico, J. M., 1988. 'Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism'. International Organization, 42(3): 485–507.
8. Hansendever, A., Mayer, P., and Rittberger, V., 1996. Interests, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International Regimes'. Mershon International Studies Review, 40(2): 177–228.
9. Hoffmann, S., 1966. “ 'Nuclear Proliferation and World Polities' ”. In A World of Nuclear Powers?, Edited by: Buchan, A., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Hughes, C. W., 1996. "The North Korean Nuclear Crisis and Japanese Security'. Survival, 38(3): 79–103.
11. Ikenberry, G. J., and Kupchan, C. A., 1990. 'Socialization and Hegemonic Power'. International Organization, 44(3): 283–316.
12. Jervis, R., 1983. “ 'Security Regimes' ”. In International Regimes, Edited by: Krasner, S. D., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13. Katzenstein, P. J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Keeley, J. F., 1987. “ 'Legitimacy, Capability, Effectiveness and the Future of the NPT' ”. In Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Global Security, Edited by: Dewitt, D. B., London: Croom Helm.
15. Keohane, R. O., 1969. 'Lilliputians' Dilemmas: Small States in International Polities'. International Organization, 23(2): 291–310.
16. Keohane, R. O., 1986. 'Reciprocity in International Relations'. International Organization, 20: 1–27.
17. Keohane, R. O., and Martin, L., 1995. "The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,'. International Security, 20: 39–51.
18. Knopf, J. W., 2002. 'Recasting the Proliferation Optimism-Pessimism Debate'. Security Studies, 12(1) Autumn: 41–96.
19. Lipson, C., 1984. International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs'. World Politics, 37(1): 1–23.
20. Mansfield, E. D., 1995. International Institutions and Economic Sanctions'. World Politics, 47: 575–605.
21. Martin, L., 1999. “ 'An Institutionalist View: International Institutions and State Strategies' ”. In International Order and the Future of World Politics, Edited by: Paul, T. V., and Hall, J. A., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Mueller, H., 1992. “ The Role of Hegemonies and Alliances' ”. In Security without Nuclear Weapons, Edited by: Karp, R. C., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Nayar, B. R., and Paul, T. V., 2002. India in the World Order: Searching for Major Power Status, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Nye, J. S., Jr. 1982. 'The U.S. and Soviet Stakes in Nuclear Proliferation'. P.S., 15(1): 32–39.
25. Nye, J. S., 1985. 'NPT: The Logic of Inequality'. Foreign Policy, 59: 123–31.
26. Paul, T. V., 1994. Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Paul, T. V., 1995. 'Nuclear Taboo and War Initiation in Regional Conflicts'. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39: 696–717.
28. Paul, T. V., 1998a. “ 'Power, Influence and Nuclear Weapons: a Reassessment' ”. In The Absolute Weapon Revisited: Nuclear Arms and the Emerging International Order, Edited by: Paul, T. V., Harknett, R. J., and Wirtz, J., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Paul, T. V., 1998b. The Systemic Bases of India's Challenge to the Global Nuclear Order'. Nonproliferation Review, 6: 1–11.
30. Paul, T. V., 2000. Power versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens' University Press.
31. Potter, W. C., 1985. 'Nuclear Proliferation: U.S.-Soviet Cooperation'. Washington Quarterly, 8(1): 141–54.
32. Rauf, T., and Johnson, R., 1995. 'After the NPT's Indefinite Extension: The Future of the Global Non-Proliferation Regime'. Nonproliferation Review, 3(1): 28–41.
33. Sanger, D. E., and Dao, J., 2002. 'U.S. Says Pakistan Gave Technology to North Korea'. New York Times, 18 October: 1
34. Schelling, T. C., 1994. "The Role of Nuclear Weapons' ”. In Turning Point: The Gulf War and U.S. Military Strategy, Edited by: Ederington, L. B., and Mazarr, M. J., Boulder: Westview Press.
35. Scheinman, L., 1987. The International Atomic Energy Agency and World Nuclear Order, Washington: Resources for the Future.
36. Smith, R. K., 1987. 'Explaining the Non-Proliferation Regime: Anomalies for Contemporary International Relations Theory'. International Organization, 41(2): 253–81.
37. Stein, A. A., 1990. Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
38. Strange, S., 1983. “ 'Cave! Hie Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis' ”. In International Regimes, Edited by: Krasner, S. D., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39. Tannenwald, N., 1999. The Nuclear Taboo'. International Organization, 53(3): 433–68.
40. Waltz, K. N., 1979. Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House.
41. Weltman, J. J., 1980. 'Nuclear Devolution and World Order'. World Politics, 32(2): 169–93.
42. Wendt, A., 1994. 'Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Polities'. International Organization, 46(2): 391–425.
43. Zacher, M. W., and Sutton, B. A., 1996. Governing Global Networks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.