Ideational change in the wto and its impacts on eu agricultural policy institutions and the cap

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 311-327

  Daugbjerg, Carsten ^a   Swinbank, Alan ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CAP; EU; Ideas; institutions; paradigm change; WTO

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050715207     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330902782162     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ackrill, R.W., 2000. CAP reform 1999: a crisis in the making?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38 (2): 343–53.
2. Blyth, M., 2002. Great transformations: economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3. Coleman, W., Grant, W., and Josling, T., 2004. Agriculture in the new global economy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
4. Coleman, W.D., Skogstad, G.D., and Atkinson, M.M., 1997. Paradigm shifts and policy networks: cumulative change in agriculture. Journal of Public Policy, 16 (3): 273–301.
5. Commission of the European Communities. 1985. Perspectives for the common agricultural policy The Green Paper of the Commission, Brussels, COM(85)333
6. Commission of the European Communities. 1991. Communication to the Council: the development and future of the CAP Reflections Paper of the Commission, Brussels, COM(91)100
7. Commission of the European Communities. 1998. Agenda 2000. The future for European agriculture, Brussels: Explanatory Memorandum.
8. Commission of the European Communities. 2002. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Mid-term review of the common agricultural policy Brussels COM(2002)394
9. Commission of the European Communities. 2003. Proposal for establishing common rules for direct support under the common agricultural policy and support schemes for producers of certain crops Brussels COM(2003)23
10. Commission of the European Communities. 2007. Proposal for a Council regulation laying down specific rules as regards the fruit and vegetable sector and amending certain regulations Brussels COM(2007)17
11. Council of the European Union. 2003. CAP reform — Presidency compromise (in agreement with the Commission) Note from Presidency to Delegations, 30 June, 10961/03, Brussels
12. Daugbjerg, C., 1999. Reforming the CAP: policy networks and broader institutional structures. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (3): 407–28.
13. Daugbjerg, C., 2008. Ideas in two-level games: the EC–US dispute over agriculture in the GATT Uruguay round. Comparative Political Studies, 41 (9): 1266–89.
14. Daugbjerg, C., and Swinbank, A., 2007. The politics of CAP reform: trade negotiations, institutional settings and blame avoidance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45 (1): 1–22.
15. Daugbjerg, C., and Swinbank, A., 2008. Curbing agricultural exceptionalism: the EU’s response to external challenge. The World Economy, 31 (5): 631–52.
16. Defra and HM Treasury. 2005. A vision for the common agricultural policy, London: Stationery Office.
17. European Commission. Environment as a non-trade concern. Discussion Paper Two, presented at the ‘International conference on non-trade concerns in agriculture’. May28–31, Mauritius.
18. European Council. 1999. Presidency conclusions: Berlin European Council 24 and 25 March 1999, Brussels: Press Release. Nr. SN 100
19. Fischler, F., CAP — state of play. Presentation by Commissioner Franz Fischler. April. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/capreform/comsem1.pdf (accessed 31 July 2007)
20. Fischler, F., The mid term review of the CAP. Presentation at the Commission Seminar on the MTR. April2002. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/capreform/comsem2.pdf (accessed 31 July 2007)
21. Garzon, I., 2006. Reforming the common agricultural policy: history of a paradigm change, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
22. Hall, P.A., 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (3): 275–96.
23. Haniotis, T., 2007. “ The 2003 reform of the European Union’s common agricultural policy and its relevance to the U.S. farm policy debate ”. In U.S. agricultural policy and the 2007 farm bill, Edited by: Arha, K., Josling, T., Sumner, D.A., and Thompson, B.H., 53–74. Stanford University: Woods Institute for the Environment.
24. Moyer, H.W., and Josling, T.E., 2002. Agricultural policy reform: politics and policy process in the EC and the US in the 1990s, Aldershot: Ashgate.
25. Norway. Coexistence in a world of agricultural diversity — the right of every country to safeguard non-trade concerns. Discussion Paper One, presented at the ‘International conference on non-trade concerns in agriculture’. May28–31, Mauritius.
26. Skogstad, G., 1998. Ideas, paradigms and institutions: agricultural exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States. Governance, 11 (4): 463–90.
27. Steinberg, R.H., and Josling, T.E., 2003. When the peace clause ends: the vulnerability of EC and US agricultural subsidies to WTO legal challenge. Journal of International Economic Law, 6 (2): 369–417.
28. Sumner, D.A., 2005. Boxed in: conflicts between U.S. farm policies and WTO obligations, Washington D.C.: Cato Institute, Trade Policy Analysis No. 32.
29. Swinbank, A., 1999. EU agriculture, agenda 2000 and the WTO commitments. The World Economy, 22 (1): 41–54.
30. Swinbank, A., 2005. “ The CAP as a catalyst for trade conflict between the EU and the United States ”. In The WTO and the regulation of international trade. Recent trade disputes between the European Union and the United States, Edited by: Perdikis, N., and Read, R., 63–85. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
31. Swinbank, A., and Daugbjerg, C., 2006. The 2003 CAP reform: accommodating WTO pressures. Comparative European Politics, 4 (1): 47–64.
32. Tangermann, S., 2004. “ Agricultural policies in OECD countries ten years after the Uruguay round: how much progress? ”. In Agricultural policy reform and the WTO: where are we heading?, Edited by: Anania, G., Bohman, M.E., Carter, C.A., and McCalla, A.F., 15–42. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
33. Thelen, K., 2003. “ How institutionalism evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis ”. In Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, Edited by: Mahoney, J., and Rueschemeyer, D., 208–40. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
34. WTO. 2000. Note on non-trade concerns, Revision G/AG/NG/W/36/Rev.1
35. WTO. 2001. “ Committee on agriculture, Special Session ”. In Statement by Australia, Geneva: WTO. G/AG/NG/W/167
36. Young, O.R., 1997. “ Global governance: towards a theory of decentralized world order ”. In Global governance: insights from the environmental experience, Edited by: Young, O.R., 273–99. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.