Interpretations of literacy

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 51-63

  Layton, Lyn ^a   Miller, Carol ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050712603     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0305764042000183124     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beard R, (1998) National Literacy Strategy: review of research and other related evidence (Sudbury, DfEE Publications)
2. Braithwaite J, (1999) Does it matter what I think? An exploration of teachers' constructions of literacy and their classroom practices, paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research Lahti, Finland, 22–25 September. Available online at: www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documentas /0000 1288.htm
3. Brooks G, Pugh AK, Schagen I, (1996) Reading performance at nine (Slough, NFER)
4. Byers, R. (1999). The National Literacy Strategy and pupils with special educational needs. British Journal of Special Education, 26(1): 8–11.
5. DES (1988) Education Reform Act (1988) (London, HMSO)
6. DfE (1994) The Code of Practice on the identification and assessment of special educational needs (London, HMSO)
7. DfEE (1997) Excellence for all children: meeting special educational needs (Green Paper) (London, DfEE)
8. DfEE (1998) The National Literacy Strategy framework for teaching (London, HMSO)
9. DfEE/QCA (1999) The National Curriculum: handbook for primary/secondary teachers in England (London, HMSO)
10. English, E, Hargreaves, L, and Hislam, J. (2002). Pedagogical dilemmas in the National Literacy Strategy: primary teachers' perceptions, reflections and classroom behaviour. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(1): 9–26.
11. Fletcher-Campbell, F. (Ed.) (2000) Literacy and special educational needs: a review of the literature Research Report RR227 (London, DfEE)
12. Gough, PB. (1995). The new literacy: caveat emptor. Journal of Research in Reading, 18(2): 79–86.
13. Her Majesty's Inspectorate (1985) The curriculum from 5–16: curriculum matters 2 (London, HMSO)
14. Koenig, AJ. (1992). A framework for understanding the literacy of individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 86(7): 277–283.
15. Lacey P, Layton L, Miller C, (2002) The National Literacy Strategy: including or excluding children with SEN? Final Report to the Nuffield Foundation. Unpublished report, University of Birmingham
16. Literacy Task Force (1997) The implementation of the National Literacy Strategy (London, DfEE)
17. McCall, S, and McLinden, M. (1997). Towards an inclusive model of literacy for people who are blind and have additional learning difficulties. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 15(3): 117–121.
18. Miller, C, Lacey, P, and Layton, L. (2003). Including children with SEN in the Literacy Hour: a continuing challenge. British Journal of Special Education, 30(1): 13–20.
19. QCA/DfEE (2001) Planning, teaching and assessing the curriculum for pupils with learning difficulties (London, QCA)
20. Roberts, P. (1995). Defining literacy: Paradise, nightmare or red herring?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(4): 412–432.
21. Street B, (1984) Literacy in theory and practice (London, Cambridge University Press)
22. Wearmouth, J, and Soler, J. (2001). How inclusive is the Literacy Hour?. British Journal of Special Education, 28(3): 113–119.
23. Wittgenstein L, (1969) The blue and brown books: preliminary studies for the philosophical investigations (2nd edn) (London, Blackwell)