Real-time QoE estimation of DASH-based mobile video applications through edge computing

INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 766-771

  Ge, Chang ^a   Wang, Ning ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDGE COMPUTING; HTTP; MOTION PICTURE EXPERTS GROUP STANDARDS; QUALITY OF SERVICE;

DYNAMIC ADAPTIVE STREAMING OVER HTTP; DYNAMIC CONDITION; ESTIMATION SYSTEMS; MOBILE VIDEO APPLICATIONS; NETWORK ENVIRONMENTS; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); RESOURCE ADAPTATIONS; VIDEO APPLICATIONS;

WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 85050695667     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INFCOMW.2018.8406935     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Mobile Edge Computing-a key technology towards 5G.
2. Akamai Technologies. Akamai introduces predictive video over cellular capabilities (press release). Available at https: //www.akamai.com/uk/en/about/news/press/2015-press/ akamai-introduces-predictive-video-over-cellular-capabilities.jsp.
3. A. E. Essaili, D. Schroeder, E. Steinbach, D. Staehle, and M. Shehada. QoE-based traffic and resource management for adaptive HTTP video delivery in LTE. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 25(6): 988-1001, June 2015.
4. ETSI. Mobile Edge Computing: A key technology towards 5G (Whitepaper). Available at http: //www.etsi.org/images/files/ETSIWhitePapers/ etsi wp11 mec a key technology towards 5g.pdf.
5. C. Ge, N. Wang, G. Foster, and M. Wilson. Toward QoE-assured 4K video-on-demand delivery through mobile edge virtualization with adaptive prefetching. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(10): 2222-2237, Oct 2017.
6. IETF. RFC5246-the transport layer security (TLS) protocol version 1.2, 2008.
7. ISO. ISO/IEC 23009-1: 2014 dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH)-Part 1: Media presentation descrIPtion and segment formats.
8. P. Juluri, V. Tamarapalli, and D. Medhi. Measurement of quality of experience of video-on-demand services: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(1): 401-418, Firstquarter 2016.
9. R. Huysegems et al. Session reconstruction for HTTP adaptive streaming: Laying the foundation for network-based QoE monitoring. In Proc. IWQoS. IEEE, June 2012.
10. S. Latŕe et al. On-line estimation of the QoE of progressive download services in multimedia access networks. In Proc. ICOMP, pages 181-187, 2008.
11. R. Schatz, T. Hosfeld, and P. Casas. Passive YouTube QoE monitoring for ISPs. In Proc. IMIS, pages 358-364. IEEE, July 2012.
12. S. Thakolsri, W. Kellerer, and E. Steinbach. QoE-based cross-layer optimization of wireless video with unperceivable temporal video quality fluctuation. In Proc. ICC. IEEE, June 2011.