Distance Geometry in Molecular Modeling

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 5, Issue , 2007, Pages 299-335

  Blaney, Jeffrey M ^a   Dixont, J Scott ^b  

^a NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050562346     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470125823.ch6     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. W. Braun, Q. Rev. Biophys., 19, 115 (1987). Distance Geometry and Related Methods for Protein Structure Determination from NMR Data.
2. D. Hare, DSPACE, 1988. Infinity Systems, 14810 216th Ave NE, Woodinville, WA 98072.
3. K. Wiithrich, Science, 243, 45 (1989). Protein Structure Determination in Solution by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.
4. T. F. Havel, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 56, 43 (1991). An Evaluation of Computational Strategies for Use in the Determination of Protein Structure from Distance Constraints Obtained by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
5. A. E. Howard and P. A. Kollman, J. Med. Chem., 31, 1669 (1988). An Analysis of Current Methodologies for Conformational Searching of Complex Molecules.
6. A. R. Leach, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 2, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1991, pp. 1-55. A Survey of Methods for Searching the Conformational Space of Small and Medium-Sized Molecules.
7. J. M. Goodman and W. C. Still, J. Comput. Chem., 12, 1110 (1991). An Unbounded System-atic Search of Conformational Space.
8. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Chem. Phys., 21, 1087 (1953). Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines.
9. J. A. McCammon and S. C. Harvey, Dynamics of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
10. T. Havel and K. Wiithrich, Bull. Math. Biol., 46, 673 (1984). A Distance Geometry Program for Determining the Structures of Small Proteins and Other Macromolecules from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Measurements of Intramolecular H-H Proximities in Solution.
11. J. M. Blaney, G. M. Crippen, A. Dearing, and J. S. Dixon, DCEOM, QCPE Catalog, 10, #590 (1990). Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
12. A. Smellie, Constrictor, 1990. Oxford Molecular Limited, Oxford, UK.
13. J. Kuszewski, M. Nilges, and A. T. Brunger, J. Biomol. NMR, 2, 33 (1992). Sampling and Efficiency of Metric Matrix Distance Geometry-A Novel Partial Metrization Algorithm.
14. P. K. Weiner, S. Profeta, Jr., G. Wipff, T. Havel, I. D. Kuntz, R. Langridge, and P. A. Kollman, Tetrahedron, 39, 1113 (1983). A Distance Geometry Study of Ring Systems: Application to Cyclooctane, 18-Crown-6, Cyclodecane and Androstanedione.
15. C. E. Peishoff, J. S. Dixon, and K. D. Kopple, Biopolymers, 30, 45 (1990). Application of the Distance Geometry Algorithm to Cyclic Oligopeptide Conformation Searches.
16. C. E. Peishoff and J. S. Dixon, J. Comput. Chem., 13, 565 (1992). Improvements to the Distance Geometry Algorithm for Conformational Sampling of Cyclic Structures.
17. K. T. O'Neil and W. F. DeGrado, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 82, 4954 (1985). A Predicted Structure of Calmodulin Suggests an Electrostatic Basis for Its Function.
18. T. F. Havel and M. E. Snow, J. Mol. Biol., 217, 1 (1991). A New Method for Building Protein Conformations from Sequence Alignments with Homologues of Known Structure.
19. R. P. Sheridan, R. Nilakantan, J. S. Dixon, and R. Venkataraghavan, J. Med. Chem., 29, 899 (1986). The Ensemble Approach to Distance Geometry: Application to the Nicotinic Pharmacophore.
20. M. G. Wong and P. R. Andrews, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 24, 323 (1989). Conformational Requirements for Convulsant Compounds.
21. J. M. Blaney and J. S. Dixon, Annu. Rep. Med. Chem., 26, 281 (1991). Receptor Modeling by Distance Geometry.
22. W. C. Ripka, W. J. Sipio, and J. M. Blaney, Lectures in Heterocyclic Chemistry, IX, S95 (1987). Molecular Modeling and Drug Design: Strategies in the Design and Synthesis of Phospholipase A2 Inhibitors.
23. A. S. Smellie, G. M. Crippen, and W. G. Richards, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 31, 386 (1991). Fast Drug-Receptor Mapping by Site-Directed Distances: A Novel Method of Predicting New Pharmacological Leads.
24. J. Lautz, H. Kessler, J. M. Blaney, R. M. Scheek, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Int. J. Peptide Protein Res., 33, 281 (1989). Calculating Three-Dimensional Molecular Structure from Atom-Atom Distance Information: Cyclosporin A.
25. M. A. Siani, C. K. Marlowe, E. K. Bradley, and J. M. Blaney, in Ninth European Symposium on Structure-Activity Relationships: QSAR and Molecular Modelling, Strasbourg, France (1992). Broccoli: A Systematic Method for Designing Conformationally Constrained Mimics of a Proposed Protein Binding Site.
26. J. C. Wenger and D. H. Smith, Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 22, 29 (1982). Deriving Three-Dimensional Representations of Molecular Structure from Connection Tables Augmented with Configuration Designations Using Distance Geometry.
27. Sketcher, Insight/Discover, 1992. BIOSYM Technologies, 9685 Scranton Road, San Diego, CA.
28. D. A. Wertz, C.-X. Shi, and C. A. Venanzi, J. Comput. Chem., 13, 41 (1992). A Comparison of Distance Geometry and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Techniques for Conformational Analysis of (3-Cydodextrin.
29. Y. Liu, D. Zhao, R. Altman, and O. Jardetzky, J. Biomol. NMR, 2, 373 (1992). A Systematic Comparison of Three Structure Determination Methods from NMR Data: Dependence upon Quality and Quantity of Data.
30. T. F. Havel, G. M. Crippen, and I. D. Kuntz, Biopolymers, 18, 73 (1979). Effects of Distance Constraints on Macromoiecular Conformation. II. Simulation of Experimental Results and Theoretical Predictions.
31. G. M. Crippen and T. F. Havel, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 34, 282 (1978). Stable Calculation of Coordinates from Distance Information.
32. G. M. Crippen, Distance Geometry and Conformational Calculations, Vol. 1 in D. Bawden, Ed., Chemometrics Research Studies Series, Research Studies Press (Wiley), New York, 1981.
33. G. M. Crippen and T. F. Havel, Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation, Vol. 15 in D. Bawden, Ed., Chemometrics Research Studies Series, Research Studies Press (Wiley), New York, 1988.
34. D. B. Boyd, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 1, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1990, pp. 321-354. Aspects of Molecular Modeling.
35. E. A. Torda and W. F. van Gunsteren, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. 3, K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1992, pp. 143-172. Molecu lar Modeling Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data.
36. G. M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem., 10, 896 (1989). Linearized Embedding: A New Metric Ma-trix Algorithm for Calculating Molecular Conformations Subject to Geometric Constraints.
37. G. M. Crippen, A. S. Smellie, and W. W Richardson, J. Comput. Chem., 13, 1262 (1992). Conformational Sampling by a General Linearized Embedding Algorithm.
38. W. Braun and N. Go, J. Mol. Biol., 186, 611 (1985). Calculation of Protein Conformations by Proton-Proton Distance Constraints: A New Efficient Algorithm.
39. T. F. Havel, I. D. Kuntz, and G. M. Crippen, Bull. Math. Biol., 45, 665 (1983). The Theory and Practice of Distance Geometry.
40. A. W. M. Dress and T. F. Havel, Discrete Appl. Math., 19, 129 (1988). Shortest-Path Problems and Molecular Conformation.
41. P. L. Easthope and T. F. Havel, Bull. Math. Biol., 51, 173 (1989). Computational Experience with an Algorithm for Tetrangle Inequality Bound Smoothing.
42. L. M. Blumenthal, Theory and Applications of Distance Geometry. Chelsea Publishing Com-pany, Bronx, NY, 1970.
43. T. F. Havel, Biopolymers, 29, 1565 (1990). The Sampling Properties of Some Distance Geom-etry Algorithms Applied to Unconstrained Polypeptide Chains: A Study of 1830 Independently Computed Conformations.
44. 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Assignments from Distance Geometry Calculations.
45. G. M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem., 3, 471 (1982). Conformational Analysis by Energy Embedding.
46. G. M. Crippen, personal communication, 1984.
47. D. F. Shanno and K. H. Phua, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 6, 618 (1980). Minimization of Unconstrained Multivariate Functions.
48. M. Saunders, K. N. Houk, Y.-D. Wu, W. C. Still, M. Lipton, G. Chang, and W. C. Guida, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 112, 1419 (1990). Conformations of Cycloheptadecane. A Comparison of Methods for Conformational Searching.
49. J. S. Dixon and C. E. Peishoff, (1992). Unpublished results.
50. T. D. J. Perkins and D. J. Barlow, J. Mol. Graphics, 8, 156 (1990). RAMBLE: A Conforma-tional Search Program.
51. F. E. Cohen and M. J. E. Sternberg, J. Mol. Biol., 137, 9 (1980). On the Use of Chemically Derived Distance Constraints in the Prediction of Protein Structure with Myoglobin as an Example.
52. Y. Seno and N. Go, J. Mol. Biol., 216, 95 (1990). Deoxymyoglobin Studied by the Conforma-tional Normal Mode Analysis. I. Dynamics of Globin and the Heme-Globin Interaction.
53. D. R. Ferro and J. Hermans, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 33, 345 (1977). A Different Best Rigid-Body Molecular Fit Routine.
54. W. Kabsch, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 34, 827 (1978). A Discussion of the Solution for the Best Rotation to Relate Two Sets of Vectors.
55. A. D. McLachlan, J. Mol. Biol., 128, 49(1979). Gene Duplications in the Structural Evolution of Chymotrypsin.
56. A. D. McLachlan, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 38, 871 (1982). Rapid Comparison of Protein Structures.
57. H. Spath, Cluster-Analysis Algorithms for Data Reduction and Classification of Objects. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1980.
58. R. A. Jarvis and E. A. Patrick, IEEE Trans. Comput., C22, 1025 (1973). Clustering Using a Similarity Measure Based on Shared Near Neighbors.
59. J. M. Blaney (1990). Unpublished results.
60. P. Willett, Similarity and Clustering in Chemical Information Systems. Research Studies Press, Letchworth, 1987.
61. P. Murray-Rust and J. Raftery, J. Mol. Graphics, 3, 50 (1985). Computer Analysis of Molecu-lar Geometry, Part VI. Classification of Differences in Conformation.
62. F. E. Cohen and M. J. E. Sternberg, J. Mol. Biol., 138, 321 (1980). On the Prediction of Protein Structure: The Significance of the Root-Mean-Square Deviation.
63. L. Morgenstern, M. Recanatini, T. E. Klein, W. Steinmetz, C.-Z. Yang, R. Langridge, and C. Hansen, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 10767 (1987). Chymotrypsin Hydrolysis of X-Phenyl Hippu-rates. A QSAR and Molecular Graphics Analysis.
64. F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, G. T. B. Williams, E. F. Meyer, M. D. Brice, J. R. Rodgers, O. Kennard, T. Shimanouchi, and M. Tasumi, J. Mol. Biol., 112, 535 (1977). The Brookhaven Protein Data Bank.
65. M. L. Connolly, Science, 221, 709 (1983). Solvent-Accessible Surfaces of Proteins and Nucleic Acids.
66. J. M. Veal, Y. Li, S. C. Zimmerman, C. R. Lamberson, M. Cory, G. Zon, and W. D. Wilson, Biochemistry, 29, 10918 (1990). Interaction of a Macrocyclic Bisacridine with DNA.
67. Q. Gao, L. D. Williams, M. Egli, D. Rabinovich, S. L. Chen, G. J. Quigley, and A. Rich, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 88, 2422 (1991). Drug-Induced DNA Repair: X-Ray Structure of a DNA-Ditercalinium Complex.
68. S. N. Rao and P. A. Kollman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 84, 5735 (1987). Mole-cular Mechanical Simulations on Double Intercalation of 9-Aminoacridine into d(CGCGCGC).d(GCGCGCG): Analysis of the Physical Basis for the Neighbor-Exclusion Principle.