Running rings round law? an ecological approach to teaching law for child-centred practice

Social Work Education

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 493-503

  Duncan, Tess ^a   Piper, Christine ^a   Warren Adamson, Chris ^b  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Child Law; Child Protection; Ecological; Pqcca

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050420555     PISSN: 02615479     EISSN: 14701227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0261547032000126434     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BADHAM, B., 2001. Count us in! Children, young people and neighbourhood renewal. Childright, 174: 14–17.
2. BAILEY-HARRIS, R., and HARRIS, M., 2002. Local authorities and child protection--the mosaic of accountability. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 14(2): 117–136.
3. BOUSHEL, M., 1994. The protective environment of children: towards a framework for anti-oppressive, cross-cultural and cross-national understanding. British Journal of Social Work, 24: 173–191.
4. BRAYE, S., and PRESTON-SHOOT, M., 1994. Partners in community care? Rethinking the relationship between law and social work practice. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Low, 2: 163–183.
5. BRONFENBRENNER, U., 1979. The Ecology of Human Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6. BURTON, F., MARTIN CLEMENT, N., STANDLEY, K., and WILLIAMS, C., 1999. Teaching Family Law, University of Warwick: The National Centre for Legal Education.
7. CCETSW. 2000. now General Social Care Council) Assuring Quality for Child Care Social Work, London: Central Council for the Education and Training in Social Work.
8. COWAN, D., and DEARDEN, N., 2001. “ The minor as (a) subject: the case of housing law ”. In Legal Concepts of Childhood, Edited by: FIONDA, J., Oxford: Hart Publishing.
9. DAVID, M., 1993. Parents, Gender and Education Reform, Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. DAVIS, G., BEVAN, G., and PEARCE, J., 2001. Family mediation--where do we go from here?. Family Law,: 265–269.
11. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 1999. Working Together to Safeguard Children, London: Stationery Office.
12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 2000. in conjunction with the Home Office and the Department for Education and Employment) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Families, London: Stationery Office.
13. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY. 1999. A New Contract for Welfare: Children's Rights and Parents'. Responsibilities, White Paper) Cm 4349. [http://www.dss.gov.uk.]
14. EEKELAAR, J., 1999. Family law: keeping us On message'. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 11(4): 387–396.
15. FIONDA, J., ed. 2001. Legal Concepts of Childhood, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
16. FULBROOK, J., 2001. New Labour's welfare reforms: anything new?. Modem Law Review, 64(2): 243–259.
17. GERMAIN, C., 1991. Human Behaviour in ate Social Environment, New York: Columbia University Press.
18. GOLDING, K., 2000. Parent management training as an intervention to promote adequate parenting. Clinical Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 5(3): 357–371.
19. HARTMAN, A., 1978. Diagrammatic assessment of family relationships. Social Casework, October: 465–476.
20. JACK, G., 1997. An ecological approach to social work with children and families. Child and Family Social Work, 2: 109–120.
21. JACK, G., 2000. Ecological influences on parenting and child development. British Journal of Social Work, 30: 703–720.
22. JORDAN, B., and JORDAN, C., 2000. Social Work and the Third Way, London: Sage.
23. KAGANAS, F., and PIPER, C., 2001. Grandparents and contact: 'rights' v 'welfare' revisited, International Journal of Law. Policy and the Family, 15: 250–275.
24. KING, M., and PIPER, C., 1995. How the Law Thinks About Children, Aldershot: Arena.
25. MALUCCIO, A., FEIN, E., and OLMSTEAD, K., 1986. Permanency Planning for Children, London: Tavistock.
26. MEDIATION UK. 2001. Mediation and Neighbourhood Renewal
27. MUNN, P., ed. 1993. Parents and Schools--Customers, Managers or Partners?, London: Routledge.
28. PARTINGTON, J., and WRAGG, T., 1989. Schools and Parents, London: Cassell.
29. PIPER, C., Student expectations of learning law. paper presented at Socio-Legal Studies Conference. April, Belfast.
30. PIPER, C., 2001. Who are these 'youths'? Language in the service of policy. Youth Justice, 1(2): 30–39.
31. RAMSDEN, P., 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education, London: Routledge.
32. SALEEBY, D., 2002. Human Behaviour in Social Environments, NY: Columbia University Press.
33. SMITH, D., 1993. Safe from Harm, a Code of Practice for Safeguarding the Welfare of Children in Voluntary Organisations in England and Wales, London: Home Office.
34. SMITH, R., 2002. The wrong end of the telescope: child protection or child safety?. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Late, 24(3): 247–261.
35. STATHAM, D., 1978. Radicals in Social Work, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
36. TWINING, W., and MIERS, D., 1976. How to do Things with Rules, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
37. WARREN, C., 1997. “ Family support and the journey to empowerment ”. In Social Action with Children and their Families--a Community Development Approach, Edited by: CANNAN, C., and WARREN, C., London: Routledge.
38. WHITTAKER, J., SHINKE, S. P., and GILCHRIST, L. D., 1986. The ecological paradigm in child, youth, and family services: implications for policy and practice. Social Services Review, December: 483–503.
39. WREN, B., 1996. In defence of eclecticism. Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1(1): 11–18.