The Core Curriculum Content of NASPAA-Accredited Programs: Fundamentally Alike or Different?

Journal of Public Affairs Education

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 259-273

  Breaux, David A ^a   Clynch, Edward J ^a   Morris, John C ^b  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050419161     PISSN: 15236803     EISSN: 23289643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2003.12023598     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Appleby, Paul H., 1949. Policy and Administration. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.
2. Allison, Graham T., 1979. “Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?” In Setting Public Management Research Agendas: Integrating the Sponsor, Producer; and User. OPM Document 127-53-1,27-38. Washington, DC: Office of Personnel Management, February 1980. Reprinted in Richard J., Stillman II, ed., Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 283–298.
3. Bozeman, Barry. 1987 All Organizations Are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4. Brewer, Gene A., James W, Douglas, Rex L., Facer II, and Laurence J., O'Toole, Jr. 1999. “Determinants of Graduate Research Productivity in Doctoral Programs of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review, 59(5): 373–382.
5. Cleary, Robert E., 1990. “What Do Public Administration Master's Programs Look Like? Do They Do What Is Needed?” Public Administration Review, 50(6): 663–673.
6. Council for Higher Education Accreditation. 2002a. “Specialized and Professional Accrediting Organizations 2002–2003.” http://www.chea.org/Directories/special.cfm
7. Council for Higher Education Accreditation 2002b. “CHEA At A Glance.” http://www.chea.org/About/cheaat-a-glance.cfm
8. Dickey, Frank G., and Jerry W., Miller. 1972. A Current Perspective on Accreditation. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.
9. Frederickson, George H., 2000. “Life among the Deans” PA Times, 23(11): 9.
10. Goodnow, Frank. 1900. Politics and Administration. New York: Macmillan.
11. Harcleroad, Fred F., 1980. Accreditation: History, Process, and Problems. Washington D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.
12. Havighurst, Clark C., 1994. “Forward: The Place of Private Accrediting among Instruments of Government.” Law and Contemporary Problems, 57(4): 1–14.
13. Gawthrop, Louis C., 1997. “Democracy, Bureaucracy, and Hypocrisy Redux: A Search for Sympathy and Comparison.” Public Administration Review, 57(3): 205–217.
14. Henry, Laurin L., 1995. “Early NASPAA History.” Washington D.C.: National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration.
15. Henry, Nicholas L., 1990. “Root and Branch: Public Administration Travail Toward the Future.” In Naomi, Lynn and Wildavsky, eds., Public Administration: The State of the Discipline. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House.
16. Kiriin, John J., 1996. “The Big Questions of Public Administration in a Democracy.” Public Administration Review, 56(5): 416–423.
17. Long, Norton. 1996a. “Public Policy and Administration: The Goals of Rationality and Responsibility.” Public Administration Review, 56(2): 149–152.
18. Long, Norton. 1996b. “Public Administration and the Goals of Rationality and Responsibility: Further Reflections.” Public Administration Review, 56(2): 152–154.
19. Moe, Terry M., 1994. “Integrating Politics and Organizations: Positive Theory and Public Administration.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4(1): 17–25.
20. Moe, Terry M., 1987. “Exploring the Limits of Privatization.” Public Administration Review, 47(6): 453–459.
21. Montjoy, Robert S., and Douglas J., Watson. 1995. “A Case for Reinterpreted Dichotomy of Politics and Administration as a Professional Standard in Council-Manager Government.” Public Administration Review, 55(3): 231–239.
22. Nalbandian, John. 1994. “Reflections of a ‘Pracademic’ on the Logic of Politics and Administration” Public Administration Review, 54(6): 531–536.
23. National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration, 1997. “Standards for Professional Master's Degree Programs in Public Affairs, Policy, and Administration.” Washington, D.C.: NASPAA.
24. Neumann, Francis X., Jr. 1996. “What Makes Public Administration a Science, or, Are Its ‘Big Questions’ Really Big?” Public Administration Review, 56(5): 409–415.
25. Osborne, David, and Ted, Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
26. Roeder, Phillip W., and Gordon, Whitaker. 1993. “Education in the Public Service: Policy Analysis and Administration in the MPA Core Curriculum.” Administration and Society, 24(4): 512–540.
27. Rosenbloom, David H., 1993 “Editorial: Have an Administrative Rx? Don't Forget the Politics!” Public Administration Review, 53(6): 503–507.
28. Rouse, John E., Jr. 1982. “Boundaries of an Emerging Superdiscipline.” Public Administration Review, 42(5): 390–398.
29. Svara, James H., 1998. “The Politics-Administration Dichotomy Model as Aberration.” Public Administration Review, 58(1): 51–58.
30. Waldo, Dwight. 1984. The Administrative State. New York: Holmes and Meyer.
31. Waldo, Dwight. 1987. “Politics and Administration: On Thinking about a Complex Relationship.” In Ralph, Clark Chandler, A Centennial History of the American Administrative State. New York: The Free Press.
32. Wilson, Woodrow. 1887. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly, 2(2): 197–222.