The Role of Issues in the 2000 U. S. Presidential Election

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 101-124

  Miller, Arthur H ^a   Klobucar, Thomas F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

government; issues; presidential election; trust; voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050331457     PISSN: 03604918     EISSN: 17415705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2003.tb00018.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aberbach, Joel. 1969. Alienation and political behavior. American Political Science Review 63: 86–99.
2. Abramowitz, Alan. 1996. Bill and Al's excellent adventure: Forecasting the 1996 presidential election. American Politics Quarterly 24: 434–42.
3. Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes. 1960. The American voter. New York: John Wiley.
4. Campbell, James. 1996. Polls and votes: The trial-heat presidential election forecasting model, certainty, and political campaigns. American Politics Quarterly 24: 408–33.
5. Citrin, Jack. 1974. Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review 68: 973–88.
6. Converse, Philip. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and discontent, edited by David Apter, 206–61. New York: Free Press.
7. Fair, Ray. 1988. The effect of economic events on voters for president: 1984 updated. Political Behavior 10: 168–79.
8. Granberg, Donald. 1993. Political perception. In Explorations in political psychology, edited by Shanto Iyengar, and William McGuire, 70–112. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9. Hetherington, Marc. 1999. The effect of trust on the presidential vote, 1968-96. American Political Science Reviw 93: 311–26.
10. Levi, Margaret, and Laura Stoker. 2000. Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475–507.
11. Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Tom Rice. 1992. Forecasting elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
12. Macdonald, Stuart Elaine, and George Rabinowitz. 2002. Gore v. Bush: Policy issues in the 2000 U. S. presidential election. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29 to September 1, Boston.
13. MacKuen, Michael, Robert Erikson, and James Stimson. 1992. Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U. S. economy. American Political Science Review 86: 597–611.
14. Miller, Arthur, and Bruce Gronbeck. 1994. Presidentialcampaigns and American self images. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15. Miller, Arthur H. 1974. Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review 68: 951–72.
16. Miller, Arthur H. 1999, Sex, politics, and public opinion: What political scientists really learned from the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal, PS: Political Science and Politics 32: 721–29.
17. Nadeau, Richard, and Michael Lewis-Beck. 2001. National economic voting in U. S. presidential elections. Journal of Politics 63: 159–81.
18. Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1989. A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review 83 (March): 93–121.
19. Zaller, John. 1998. Monica Lewinsky's contribution to political science. PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (June): 182–89.