Commodity single board computer clusters and their applications

Future Generation Computer Systems

Volumn 89, Issue , 2018, Pages 201-212

  Johnston, Steven J ^a   Basford, Philip J ^a   Perkins, Colin S ^b   Herry, Herry ^b   Tso, Fung Po ^c   Pezaros, Dimitrios ^b   Mullins, Robert D ^d   Yoneki, Eiko ^d   Cox, Simon J ^a   Singer, Jeremy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Centralization decentralization; Distributed computing methodologies; Edge computing; Emerging architectures; Multicore architectures; Networks cloud computing; Raspberry Pi

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COSTS; EDGE COMPUTING; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE;

CENTRALIZATION/DECENTRALIZATION; COMPUTING METHODOLOGIES; DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY; EMERGING ARCHITECTURES; MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE; MULTICORE ARCHITECTURES; SINGLE BOARD COMPUTERS; TRADITIONAL DATA CENTERS;

COMPUTATION THEORY;

EID: 85049864924     PISSN: 0167739X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2018.06.048     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Larson, E., Introduction to GumStix computers, Tech. Rep. 2007, University of West Florida.
2. Upton, E., Halfacree, G., Raspberry Pi User Guide. fourth ed., 2016, Wiley.
3. Cox, S.J., Cox, J.T., Boardman, R.P., Johnston, S.J., Scott, M., O'Brien, N.S., Iridis-pi: a low-cost, compact demonstration cluster. Cluster Comput. 17:2 (2014), 349–358, 10.1007/s10586-013-0282-7.
4. Tso, F.P., White, D.R., Jouet, S., Singer, J., Pezaros, D.P., The Glasgow Raspberry Pi cloud: A scale model for cloud computing infrastructures. 2013 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2013, IEEE, 108–112, 10.1109/ICDCSW.2013.25.
5. Basford, P., Bragg, G., Hare, J., Jewell, M., Martinez, K., Newman, D., Pau, R., Smith, A., Ward, T., Erica the rhino: A case study in using Raspberry Pi single board computers for interactive art. Electronics, 5(3), 2016, 35, 10.3390/electronics5030035.
6. King, P., SeeMore - parallel computing sculpture. MagPi 40 (2015), 46–49.
7. Sathiaseelan, A., Lertsinsrubtavee, A., Jagan, A., Baskaran, P., Crowcroft, J., Cloudrone: micro clouds in the sky. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications for Civilian Use, 2016, 41–44, 10.1145/2935620.2935625.
8. PR Newswire, Meet BeagleBone, the new $89 open source hardware platform, giving electronic enthusiasts a smaller, friendlier and more affordable treat, 2011. www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/meet-beaglebone-the-new-89-open-source-hardware-platform-giving-electronic-enthusiasts-a-smaller-friendlier-and-more-affordable-treat-132910373.html. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
9. Keller, M., Beutel, J., Thiele, L., Demo Abstract: MountainviewPrecision Image Sensing on High-Alpine Locations. Pesch, D., Das, S., (eds.) Adjunct Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Sensor Networks, EWSN, Cork, 2009, 15–16.
10. Martinez, K., Basford, P.J., De Jager, D., Hart, J.K., Using a heterogeneous sensor network to monitor glacial movement. 10th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks, Ghent, Belgium, 2013.
11. Single-board computer, 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-board_computer. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
12. Sales soar above Commodore 64. Mag Pi, 56, 2017, 8.
13. Raspberry Pi Foundation, Raspberry Pi 3 Model B+, 2018. https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-3-model-b-plus/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
14. Hard Kernel, Odroid-XU4, 2018. http://www.hardkernel.com/main/products/prdt_info.php?g_code=G143452239825. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
15. Varghese, B., Carlsson, N., Jourjon, G., Mahanti, A., Shenoy, P., Greening web servers: A case for ultra low-power web servers. International Green Computing Conference, 2014, IEEE, 1–8, 10.1109/IGCC.2014.7039157.
16. PC Extreme, Raspberry Pi colocation, 2017. https://web.archive.org/web/20170217070549/https://www.pcextreme.com/colocation/raspberry-pi. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
17. P. Stevens, IPv6 Only hosting, 2016. https://indico.uknof.org.uk/event/36/contribution/5/material/slides/0.pdf. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
18. Up Board, UP2 Specification. 2016. http://www.up-board.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/UP-Square-DatasheetV0.5.pdf. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
19. Stallings, W., Operating Systems. fourth ed., 2000, Prentice-Hall, 590.
20. University of Southampton, Switching on one of the most powerful supercomputers, University of Southampton, 2013. www.southampton.ac.uk/news/2013/10/15-uos-one-of-the-most-powerful-supercomputers.page. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
21. P. Stevens, RaspberryPiCloud, 2017. https://blog.mythic-beasts.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/raspberry-pi-cloud-final.pdf. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
22. Basford, P., Johnston, S., Pi Stack PCB. 2017, 10.5258/SOTON/D0379.
23. N. Smith, 40-core ARM cluster using the NanoPC-T3, 2016. http://climbers.net/sbc/40-core-arm-cluster-nanopc-t3/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
24. N. Smith, 5 Node Cluster of Orange Pi Plus 2Es, 2016. http://climbers.net/sbc/orange-pi-plus-2e-cluster/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
25. N. Smith, Bargain 5 Node Cluster of PINE A64+, 2017. http://climbers.net/sbc/bargain-pine-a64-cluster/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
26. Antipasto Hardware, How to make a BeagleBoard Elastic R Beowulf Cluster in a Briefcase, 2010. http://antipastohw.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/how-to-make-beagleboard-elastic-r.html. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
27. A. Marinos, What would you do with a 120-Raspberry Pi Cluster? 2014. https://resin.io/blog/what-would-you-do-with-a-120-raspberry-pi-cluster/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
28. A. Davis, The evolution of the beast continues, 2017. https://resin.io/blog/the-evolution-of-the-beast-continues/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
29. C. Burton, ClusterHAT - Cluster HAT for Raspberry Pi Zero, 2016. https://clusterhat.com/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
30. Bitscope, BitScope Blade for Raspberry Pi, 2016. www.bitscope.com/product/blade. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
31. N. Ambrosiano, C. Poling, Scalable clusters make HPC R&D easy as Raspberry Pi, 2017. www.lanl.gov/discover/news-release-archive/2017/November/1113-raspberry-pi.php. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
32. PicoCluster, PicoCluster - Big Data in A Tiny Cube, 2017. https://www.picocluster.com/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
33. Globalscale Technologies Inc., ESPRESSObin, 2017. http://espressobin.net. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
34. PCextreme, About us, 2017. https://www.pcextreme.com/about. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
35. Abrahamsson, P., Helmer, S., Phaphoom, N., Nicolodi, L., Preda, N., Miori, L., Angriman, M., Rikkila, J., Wang, X., Hamily, K., Bugoloni, S., Affordable and energy-efficient cloud computing clusters: The Bolzano Raspberry Pi cloud cluster experiment. 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, 2013, IEEE, 170–175, 10.1109/CloudCom.2013.121.
36. GCHQ, GCHQ's Raspberry Pi ’Bramble’ - exploring the future of computing, 2015. https://www.gchq.gov.uk/news-article/gchqs-raspberry-pi-bramble-exploring-future-computing. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
37. A. Grant, N. Brown, Introducing Wee Archie, 2015. https://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/blog/2015/11/26/wee-archie. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
38. G. Gibb, Linpack and BLAS on Wee Archie, 2017. https://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/blog/2017/06/07/linpack-and-blas-wee-archie. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
39. Turton, P., Turton, T.F., Pibrain —a cost-effective supercomputer for educational use. 5th Brunei International Conference on Engineering and Technology, BICET 2014, 2014, 1–4, 10.1049/cp.2014.1121.
40. Doucet, K., Zhang, J., Learning cluster computing by creating a Raspberry Pi cluster. Proceedings of the SouthEast Conference ACM SE ’17, 2017, 191–194, 10.1145/3077286.3077324.
41. Adams, J.C., Caswell, J., Matthews, S.J., Peck, C., Shoop, E., Toth, D., Wolfer, J., The micro-cluster showcase: 7 inexpensive beowulf clusters for teaching PDC. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education - SIGCSE ’16, 2016, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 82–83, 10.1145/2839509.2844670.
42. Pfalzgraf, A.M., Driscoll, J.A., A low-cost computer cluster for high-performance computing education. Electro/Information Technology (EIT), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, 2014, IEEE, 362–366, 10.1109/EIT.2014.6871791.
43. Helmer, S., Salam, S., Sharear, A.M., Ventura, A., Abrahamsson, P., Oyetoyan, T.D., Pahl, C., Sanin, J., Miori, L., Brocanelli, S., Cardano, F., Gadler, D., Morandini, D., Piccoli, A., Bringing the cloud to rural and remote areas via cloudlets. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Computing for Development - ACM DEV ’16, 2016, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1–10, 10.1145/3001913.3001918.
44. Pahl, C., Helmer, S., Miori, L., Sanin, J., Lee, B., A Container-Based Edge Cloud PaaS Architecture Based on Raspberry Pi Clusters. 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops, FiCloudW, 2016, IEEE, 117–124, 10.1109/W-FiCloud.2016.36.
45. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., Addepalli, S., Fog computing and its role in the internet of things. Proceedings of the First Edition of the MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing - MCC ’12, 2012, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 13, 10.1145/2342509.2342513.
46. Perera, C., Wakenshaw, S.Y., Baarslag, T., Haddadi, H., Bandara, A.K., Mortier, R., Crabtree, A., Ng, I.C., McAuley, D., Crowcroft, J., Valorising the iot databox: creating value for everyone. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 28(1), 2017, 10.1002/ett.3125.
47. A. Nordrum, Popular internet of things forecast of 50 billion devices by 2020 is outdated, 2016. https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/telecom/internet/popular-internet-of-things-forecast-of-50-billion-devices-by-2020-is-outdated. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
48. Moure, D., Torres, P., Casas, B., Toma, D., Blanco, M., Del Río, J., Manuel, A., Use of low-cost acquisition systems with an embedded linux device for volcanic monitoring. Sensors 15:8 (2015), 20436–20462, 10.3390/s150820436.
49. Yoneki, E., Demo: RasPiNET: decentralised communication and sensing platform with satellite connectivity. Proceedings of the 9th ACM MobiCom Workshop on Challenged Networks - CHANTS ’14, 2014, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 81–84, 10.1145/2645672.2645691.
50. Green500 List - November2016, 2017. https://www.top500.org/green500/lists/2016/11/ (Accessed 13 June 2018).
51. Cloutier, M.F., Paradis, C., Weaver, V.M., Design and analysis of a 32-bit embedded high-performance cluster optimized for energy and performance. 2014 Hardware-Software Co-Design for High Performance Computing, 2014, IEEE, 1–8, 10.1109/Co-HPC.2014.7.
52. A. Petitet, R. Whaley, J. Dongarra, A. Cleary, HPL–A portable implementation of the high–performance Linpack benchmark for distributed–memory computers. 2004. www.netlib.org/benchmark/hpl. (Accessed 13 June 2018.
53. McCalpin, J.D., Memory bandwidth and machine balance in current high performance computers. IEEE Comput. Soc. Tech. Committee Comput. Archit. Newslett., 1995, 19–25.
54. Baun, C., Performance and energy-efficiency aspects of clusters of single board computers. Internat. J. Distrib. Parallel Syst., 7(2/3/4), 2016, 4.
55. Kruger, M.J., Building a Parallella Board Cluster. (Bachelor of Science Honours thesis), 2015, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa.
56. ParallellaBoard, 2017. https://www.parallella.org/board/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
57. Saffran, J., Garcia, G., Souza, M.A., Penna, P.H., Castro, M., Góes, L.F.W., Freitas, H.C., A low-cost energy-efficient Raspberry Pi cluster for data mining algorithms. Euro-Par 2016: Parallel Processing Workshops, 2017, Springer International Publishing, 788–799.
58. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R., Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, vol. 1215, 1994, 487–499.
59. Kanungo, T., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Piatko, C.D., Silverman, R., Wu, A.Y., An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24:7 (2002), 881–892, 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017616.
60. Turkel, E., Accelerating innovation in hpc. Proceedings of the ATIP/a*CRC Workshop on Accelerator Technologies for High-Performance Computing: Does Asia Lead the Way? ATIP ’12, 2012, A*STAR Computational Resource Centre, Singapore, Singapore, 26:1–26:28 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2346696.2346727.
61. Cavium Inc., Cavium collaborates with microsoft to Demonstrate ThunderX2 Platform Compliant with Microsoft's Project Olympus Specifications, 2018. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cavium-collaborates-with-microsoft-to-demonstrate-thunderx2-platform-compliant-with-microsofts-project-olympus-specifications-300616403.html. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
62. Euro Server Project, Green computing node for European micro-servers, 2016. http://www.euroserver-project.eu/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
63. Baccelli, E., Hahm, O., Gunes, M., Wahlisch, M., Schmidt, T., RIOT OS: Towards an OS for the Internet of Things. 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, 2013, IEEE, 79–80, 10.1109/INFCOMW.2013.6970748.
64. Rajovic, N., Rico, A., Puzovic, N., Adeniyi-Jones, C., Ramirez, A., Tibidabo: Making the case for an ARM-based HPC system. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 36 (2014), 322–334, 10.1016/J.FUTURE.2013.07.013.
65. Wanza Weloli, J., Bilavarn, S., De Vries, M., Derradji, S., Belleudy, C., Efficiency modeling and exploration of 64-bit ARM compute nodes for exascale. Microprocess. Microsyst. 53 (2017), 68–80, 10.1016/J.MICPRO.2017.06.019.
66. Sharp, T., Galluppi, F., Rast, A., Furber, S., Power-efficient simulation of detailed cortical microcircuits on SpiNNaker. J. Neurosci. Methods 210:1 (2012), 110–118, 10.1016/J.JNEUMETH.2012.03.001.
67. Chen, L., Englund, C., Every second counts: integrating edge computing and service oriented architecture for automatic emergency management. J. Adv. Transp., 2018, 2018, 10.1155/2018/7592926.
68. Anderson, P., System Configuration Short Topics in System Administration, vol. 14, 2006, SAGE.
69. Dunkels, A., Gronvall, B., Voigt, T., Contiki - a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, 2004, IEEE (Computer Society), Tampa, FL, USA, 455–462, 10.1109/LCN.2004.38.
70. I. Berry, N.R. Kedia, S. Huang, B. Banisadr, Windows 10 IoT Core, 2017. https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/iot. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
71. Raspbian, 2017. https://www.raspbian.org. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
72. Ubuntu MATE for Raspberry Pi, 2017. https://ubuntu-mate.org/raspberry-pi/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
73. Alpine linux, 2017. https://alpinelinux.org/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
74. Buildroot, 2017. https://buildroot.org. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
75. OpenEmbedded project, 2017. http://openembedded.org. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
76. Yocto project, 2017. https://yoctoproject.org. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
77. A. Belloni, T. Petazzoni, Buildroot vs OpenEmbedded/Yocto project: A four hands discussion, 2016. https://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/belloni-petazzoni-buildroot-oe_0.pdf. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
78. libOSTree, 2017. https://ostree.readthedocs.io/en/latest/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
79. Mender, 2017. http://mender.io. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
80. meta-updater, 2017. https://github.com/advancedtelematic/meta-updater. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
81. LinuxKit, 2017. https://github.com/linuxkit/linuxkit. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
82. Raspberry Pi Foundation, Network Booting, 2017. https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/raspberrypi/bootmodes/net_tutorial.md. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
83. P. Stevens, Sneak Preview From Mythic Beasts Labs Raspberry Pi Netboot, 2017. https://blog.mythic-beasts.com/2016/08/05/sneak-preview-from-mythic-labs-raspberry-pi-netboot. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
84. iPXE –Open Source Boot Firmware, 2017. http://ipxe.org. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
85. Cusick, J.J., Miller, W., Laurita, N., Pitt, T., Design, construction, and use of a single board computer beowulf cluster: Application of the small-footprint, low-cost, InSignal 5420 Octa Board. CoRR, abs/1501.00039, 2014 arXiv:1501.00039.
86. Hyper-V, 2016. https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt169373(v=ws.11).aspx. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
87. Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., Warfield, A., Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., Warfield, A., Xen and the art of virtualization. Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles - SOSP ’03, vol. 37, 2003, ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 164, 10.1145/945445.945462.
88. Rosenblum, M., VMware's Virtual Platform A Virtual Machine Monitor for Commodity PCs. Hot Chips: A Symposium on High Performance Chips, Stanford, 1999.
89. Docker Inc., 2017. https://docker.com. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
90. G.M. Kurtzer, Singularity 2.1.2 - Linux application and environment containers for science, 2016. https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.60736.
91. Morabito, R., Virtualization on Internet of Things Edge Devices With Container Technologies: A Performance Evaluation. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 8835–8850, 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2704444.
92. Madhavapeddy, A., Mortier, R., Rotsos, C., Scott, D., Singh, B., Gazagnaire, T., Smith, S., Hand, S., Crowcroft, J., Unikernels: library operating systems for the cloud. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems ASPLOS ’13, 2013, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 461–472, 10.1145/2451116.2451167.
93. Apache Mesos, 2017. http://mesos.apache.org/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
94. Swarm Mode Overview, 2017. https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
95. Kubernetes, 2017. https://kubernetes.io/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
96. Burns, B., Grant, B., Oppenheimer, D., Brewer, E., Wilkes, J., Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes. Commun. ACM 59:5 (2016), 50–57, 10.1145/2890784.
97. Schot, N., Feasibility of raspberry pi 2 based micro data centers in big data applications. 23rd Twente Student Conference on IT, vol. 23, 2015, University of Twente.
98. Hajji, W., Tso, F.P., Understanding the performance of low power raspberry pi cloud for big data. Electronics, 5(2), 2016, 29, 10.3390/electronics5020029.
99. Fan, X., Chen, S., Qi, S., Luo, X., Zeng, J., Huang, H., Xie, C., An ARM-based hadoop performance evaluation platform: design and implementation. Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications, and Worksharing: 11th International Conference, 2016, Springer, 82–94, 10.1007/978-3-319-28910-6_8.
100. Marschall, M., Chef Infrastructure Automation Cookbook. 2013, Packt Publishing, 276.
101. Hendrix, V., Benjamin, D., Yao, Y., Scientific cluster deployment and recovery - using puppet to simplify cluster management. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 396(4), 2012, 10.1088/1742-6596/396/4/042027.
102. Mohaan, M., Raithatha, R., Learning Ansible : Use Ansible to Configure Your Systems, Deploy Software, and Orchestrate Advanced IT Tasks. 2014, Packt Publishing, 308.
103. Sebenik, C., Hatch, T., Salt Essentials. 2015, O'Reilly Media Inc, 178.
104. Metal as a Service, 2017. https://maas.io. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
105. B. Philips, Recoverable System Updates, 2017. https://coreos.com/blog/recoverable-system-upgrades.html. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
106. Android –OTA Updates, 2017. https://source.android.com/devices/tech/ota. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
107. Pollock, G., Thompson, D., Sventek, J., Goldsack, P., The Asymptotic Configuration of Application Components in a Distributed System. 1998, Citeseer.
108. D. Halfin, N. Brower, B. Lich, L. Poggemeyer, rkopoku, Deploy updates using Windows Update for Business, 2017. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/deployment/update/waas-manage-updates-wufb. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
109. Herry, H., Band, E., Perkins, C., Singer, J., Peer to peer secure update for heterogeneous edge devices. Proceedings of the IEEE/IFIP International Workshop on Decentralized Orchestration and Management of Distributed Heterogeneous Things (DOMINOS), 2018 https://csperkins.org/publications/2018/04/herry2018p2p-secure.pdf.
110. TensorFlow Lite, 2017. https://www.tensorflow.org/mobile/tflite. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
111. Tsai, P.-H., Hong, H.-J., Cheng, A.-C., Hsu, C.-H., Distributed analytics in fog computing platforms using TensorFlow and Kubernetes. Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS), 2017 19th Asia-Pacific, 2017, IEEE, 145–150, 10.1109/APNOMS.2017.8094194.
112. Rosenberg, J., Mahy, R., Matthews, P., Wing, D., Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN). 2008, 10.17487/RFC5389.
113. Rosenberg, J., ICE: A Protocol for NAT Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols. 2010, 10.17487/RFC5245.
114. C. Dale, apt-p2p - apt helper for peer-to-peer downloads of Debian packages, 2017. http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/zesty/man8/apt-p2p.8.html. (Accessed 13 June 2018).
115. HashiCorp, Serf: decentralized cluster membership, failure detection, and orchestration, 2017. https://www.serf.io/. (Accessed 13 June 2018).