Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pinoxaden

EFSA Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

herbicide; peer review; pesticide; pinoxaden; risk assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049787146     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3269     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. United Kingdom, 2005. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance pinoxaden prepared by the rapporteur Member State the United Kingdom in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, November 2005.
2. United Kingdom, 2013. Final Addendum to Draft Assessment Report on pinoxaden., compiled by EFSA, May 2013
3. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2013. Peer Review Report to the conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pinoxaden.
4. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues on a request from EFSA on the FOCUS groundwater models comparability and the consistency of this risk assessment of ground water contamination. The EFSA Journal 2004, 93, 1–20
5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant health, Plant protection products and their Residues on a request from EFSA related to the assessment of the acute and chronic risk to aquatic organisms with regard to the possibility of lowering the uncertainty factor if additional species were tested. The EFSA Journal 2005, 301, 1–45
6. European Commission, 1999. Guidelines for the generation of data concerning residues as provided in Annex II part A, section 6 and Annex III, part A, section 8 of Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, 1607/VI/97 rev.2, 10 June 1999.
7. European Commission, 2000. Technical Material and Preparations: Guidance for generating and reporting methods of analysis in support of pre- and post-registration data requirements for Annex II (part A, Section 4) and Annex III (part A, Section 5) of Directive 91/414. SANCO/3030/99 rev.4, 11 July 2000.
8. European Commission, 2001. Guidelines on comparability, extrapolation, group tolerances and data requirements for setting MRLs. SANCO Doc 7525/VI/95-rev.7. pp.1–31.
9. European Commission, 2002a. Guidance Document on Terrestrial Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/10329/2002 rev.2 final, 17 October 2002.
10. European Commission, 2002b. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001 rev 4 (final), 17 October 2002.
11. European Commission, 2002c. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/4145/2000.
12. European Commission, 2003. Guidance Document on Assessment of the Relevance of Metabolites in Groundwater of Substances Regulated under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/221/2000-rev. 10 - final, 25 February 2003.
13. European Commission, 2004. Guidance Document on Dermal Absorption. SANCO/222/2000 rev. 7, 19 March 2004.
14. European Commission, 2010. Guidance document on residue analytical methods. SANCO/825/00 rev. 8.1, 16 November 2010.
15. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2000. FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002
16. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2001. FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp., as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS surface water scenarios, version 1.1 dated March 2012
17. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2006. Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics, EC Document Reference Sanco/10058/2005 version 2.0, 434 pp.
18. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2007. Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp.
19. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2008. Pesticides in Air: Considerations for Exposure Assessment. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Pesticides in Air, EC Document Reference SANCO/10553/2006 Rev 2 June 2008.
20. FOCUS (Forum for the co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their use), 2009. Assessing Potential for Movement of Active Substances and their Metabolites to Ground Water in the EU. Report of the FOCUS Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/13144/2010-version.1. 604 pp, as outlined in Generic Guidance for Tier 1 FOCUS groundwater Assessment, version 2.0 dated January 2011.
21. JMPR (Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues), 2004. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Rome, Italy, 20–29 September 2004, Report 2004, 383 pp.
22. JMPR (Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues), 2007. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group on Pesticide Residues Geneva, Switzerland, 18–27 September 2007, Report 2007, 164 pp.
23. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), 2001. Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment procedures for Plant Protection Products with Non-Target Arthropods. ESCORT 2.