Classification of wetland types for mapping and large-scale inventories

Remote Sensing of Wetlands: Applications and Advances

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 19-42

  Tiner, Ralph W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WETLANDS;

CLASSIFICATION SCHEME; ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES; GEOGRAPHIC AREAS; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; REMOTELY SENSED DATA; SCIENTIFIC STUDIES;

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION;

EID: 85048954969     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b18210     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Adamus, P.R 2001. Guidebook for Hydrogeomorphic (HGM)-Based Assessment of Oregon Wetland and Riparian Sites: Statewide Classification and Profiles. Oregon Division of State Lands, Salem, OR.
2. Albert, D.A., D.A. Wilcox, J.W. Ingram, and T.A. Thompson. 2005. Hydrogeomorphic classification for Great Lakes coastal wetlands. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31(Suppl. 1):129-146.
3. Alvo, R. and S. Ponomarenko. 2003. Vegetation classification standard for Canada workshop: May 31-June 2 2000 (Hull, Quebec). Canadian Field Naturalist 117(1):125-139.
4. Arkansas Watershed Resource Information Management System, 2014, HGM classification & characteristics of Arkansas wetlands, http://anrc.cast.uark.edu/home/mawpt/statewide-planning-initiatives/hgm- characterization/hgm-classificationand-characteristics-of-arkansas-wetlands.html. Accessed November 7, 2014.
5. Brinson, M.M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Wetland Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/wrpde4.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.
6. Brooks, R.P., M.M. Brinson, K.J. Havens, C.S. Hershner, R.D. Rheinhardt, D.H. Wardrop, D.F. Whigham, A.D. Jacobs, and J.M. Rubbo. 2011. Proposed hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands of the mid-Atlantic region, USA. Wetlands 31(2):207-219.
7. Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard et al 2003. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
8. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. FWS/OBS-79/31. http://nctc.fws.gov/resources/knowledge-resources/FWS-OBS/79_31.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.
9. Dvorett, D., J. Bidwell, C. Davis, and C. DuBois. 2012. Developing a hydrogeomorphic wetlands inventory: Reclassifying National Wetlands Inventory polygons in geographic information systems. Wetlands 32:83-93.
10. Farinha, J.C., P.R. Araújo, E.P. Silva, S. Carvalho, E. Fonseca, and C. Lavinas. 2005. MedWet habitat description system. MedWet publication. http://www.medwet.org/codde/OtherResources/Habitat.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.
11. Finlayson, C.M. and A.G. van der Valk (eds.) 1995. Classification and Inventory of the World’s Wetlands. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
12. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 1998. Wetland characterization and classification for sustainable agricultural development. Sub-Regional Office for East and Southern Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/X6611E/X6611E00.HTM. Accessed November 7, 2014.
13. Gopal, B. and M. Sah. 1995. Inventory and classification of wetlands in India. Vegetatio 118:39-48.
14. Gore, A.J.P. (ed.) 1983. Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen, and Moor. Regional Studies. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
15. Green, D.L 1997. Wetland Management Technical Manual: Wetland Classification. Department of Land and Water Conservation, Ecological Services Unit, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.
16. Grossman, D.H., D. Faber-Langendoen, A.S. Weakley, M. Anderson, P. Bourgeron, R. Crawford, K. Goodin et al 1998. International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States, Vol. I, The National Vegetation Classification System: Development, Status, and Applications. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
17. Johnson, P. and P. Gerbeaux. 2004. New Zealand wetland types. Department of Conservation, Te Papa Atawhai, Nelson, New Zealand. http://www.doc.govt.nz/publications/science-and-technical/products/reports-and-books/. Accessed November 7, 2014.
18. Josse, C., G. Navarro, F. Encarnación, A. Tovar, P. Comer, W. Ferreira, F. Rodríguez et al 2007. Ecological Systems of the Amazon Basin of Peru and Bolivia. Classification and Mapping. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.
19. Junk, W.J., M.T. Fernandez Piedade, J. Schongart, M. Cohn-Haft, J.M. Adency, and F. Wittmann. 2011. A classification of major naturally-occurring Amazonian lowland wetlands. Wetlands 31:622-640.
20. Kim, K.-G., M.-Y. Park, and H.-S. Choi. 2006. Developing a wetland-type classification system in the Republic of Korea. Landscape and Ecological Engineering 2:93-110.
21. Martin, A.C., N. Hotchkiss, F.M. Uhler, and W.S. Bourn. 1953. Classification of wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. Special Scientific Report, Wildlife, No. 20.
22. Morrice, J.A., A.S. Trebitz, J.R. Kelly, M.E. Sierszen, A.M. Cotter, and T. Hollenhurst. 2011. Determining sources of water to Great Lakes coastal wetlands: A classification approach. Wetlands 31:1199-1213.
23. Pakarinen, P. 1995. Classification of boreal mires in Finland and Scandinavia-A review. Vegetatio 118:29-38.
24. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2010. Wetlands Inventory: A Ramsar Framework for Wetland Inventory and Ecological Character Description. Ramsar Handbooks for the Wise Use of Wetlands, 4th edn., Vol. 15. Gland, Switzerland. http://www.doe.ir/portal/theme/talab/0DB/2-BS/INV/SO/bs-inv-so-bk-gud-V15-2010.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014
25. Sather, J.H. (ed.) 1976. Proceedings of the National Wetland Classification and Inventory Workshop, July 20-23, 1975, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report, Washington, DC.
26. Schultink, G. and R. van Vliet. 1997. Wetland identification and protection: North American and European perspectives. Michigan State University, Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station. Research Report 554.
27. Semeniuk, C.A. and V. Semeniuk. 1995. A geomorphic approach to global classification for inland wetlands. Vegetatio 118:103-124.
28. Semeniuk, V. and C.A. Semeniuk. 1997. A geomorphic approach to global classification for natural inland wetlands and rationalization of the system used by the Ramsar Convention-A discussion. Wetlands Ecology and Management 5:145-158.
29. Simenstad, C.A., J.L. Burke, J.E. O’Connor, C. Cannon, D.W. Heatwole, M.F. Ramirez, I.R. Waite, T.D. Counihan, and K.L. Jones. 2011. Columbia River Estuary ecosystem classification-Concept and applications. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011-1228.
30. Smith, R.D., A. Ammann, C. Bartoldus, and M.M. Brinson. 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Wetland Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/elpubs/pdf/wrpde9.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.
31. Stewart, R.E. and H.A. Kantrud 1971. Classification of Natural Ponds and Lakes in the Glaciated Prairie Region. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. Resource Publication 92.
32. The Ramsar Convention Bureau 2006. Strategic Framework and Guidelines for the Future Development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971). The Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland. http://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/guide/guide-list2009-e.pdf. Accessed November 8, 2014.
33. Tiner, R.W. 1995. Piloting a more descriptive NWI. National Wetlands Newsletter 19:14-16.
34. Tiner, R.W. 1997. Keys to landscape position and landform descriptors for U.S. wetlands. Operational draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA.
35. Tiner, R.W 1999. Wetland Indicators: A Guide to Wetland Identification, Delineation, Classification, and Mapping. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
36. Tiner, R.W. 2003a. Dichotomous keys and mapping codes for wetland landscape position, landform, water flow path, and waterbody type descriptors. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA. http://www.fws.gov/northeast/EcologicalServices/pdf/wetlands/dichotomouskeys0903.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014
37. Tiner, R.W. 2003b. Correlating enhanced national wetlands inventory data with wetland functions for watershed assessments: A rationale for northeastern U.S. wetlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA.
38. Tiner, R.W. 2003c. Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands 23(3):494-516. http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/ref/collection/document/id/1334. Accessed November 7, 2014
39. Tiner, R.W 2005. In Search of Swampland: A Wetland Sourcebook and Field Guide, 2nd edn., Revised and Expanded. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
40. Tiner, R.W. 2010. NWIPlus: Geospatial database for watershed-level functional assessment. National Wetlands Newsletter 32(3):4-7, 23.
41. Tiner, R.W. 2011a. Dichotomous Keys and Mapping Codes for Wetland Landscape Position, Landform, Water Flow Path, and Waterbody Type Descriptors, Version 2.0. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA.
42. Tiner, R.W. 2011b. Predicting Wetland Functions at the Landscape Level for Coastal Georgia using NWIPlus Data. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 5, Hadley, MA. In cooperation with the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Coastal Resources Division, Brunswick, GA and Atkins North America, Raleigh, NC.
43. Tiner, R.W 2014. Dichotomous Keys and Mapping Codes for Wetland Landscape Position, Landform, Water Flow Path, and Waterbody Type Descriptors, Version 3.0. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory Program, Northeast Region, Hadley, MA.
44. Vegetation Subcommittee. 2008. National vegetation classification standard, Version 2. Federal Geographic Data Committee. February 2008. FGDC-STD-005-2008. http://usnvc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/NVCS_V2_FINAL_2008-02.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.
45. Warner, B.G. and C.D.A. Rubec (eds.) 1997. The Canadian Wetland Classification System, 2nd edn., National Wetlands Working Group. Research Centre, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. http://www.gret-perg.ulaval.ca/fileadmin/fichiers/fichiersGRET/pdf/Doc_generale/Wetlands.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.
46. Wetlands Subcommittee. 2009. Wetlands mapping standard. Federal Geographic Data Committee. FGDC-STD-015-2009. http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/wetlands-mapping/ 2009-08% 20FGDC%20Wetlands%20Mapping%20Standard_final.pdf. Accessed November 7, 2014.
47. Wetlands Subcommittee. 2013. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States, 2nd edn. Federal Geographic Data Committee. August 2013. FGDC-STD-004-2013. https://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/wetlands/nvcs-2013. Accessed November 7, 2014.
48. Whigham, D., D. Dykyjová, and S. Henjný (eds.) 1993. Wetlands of the World: Inventory, Ecology and Management, Vol. I. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
49. Zuo, P., Y. Li, C.-A. Lin, S.-H. Zhao, and D.-M. Guan. 2013. Coastal wetlands of China: Changes from the 1970s to 2007 based on a new wetland classification system. Estuaries and Coasts 36:390-400.